goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kim carnes on March 22, 2013, 03:36:00 PM

Title: Angel sucks
Post by: kim carnes on March 22, 2013, 03:36:00 PM
GTFO
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: shivvyman on March 22, 2013, 03:36:39 PM
He's missed a few easy lobs inside today. JO wants it.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on March 22, 2013, 03:41:19 PM
still #teamAngel
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 04:22:08 PM
Angel has never been as good as #teamAngel wants him to be.  He cost us this game. 
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: timhawk on March 22, 2013, 04:23:02 PM
Angel has never been as good as #teamAngel wants him to be.  He cost us this game.

LOL angel is horrible...Lasalle? LOL
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 04:25:07 PM
Angel has never been as good as #teamAngel wants him to be.  He cost us this game.

LOL angel is horrible...Lasalle? LOL

While I agree that Angel was horrible today, what is absurd is any ku fan talking about 1st round losses.    You guys took teams full of McD AA's into 1st round games against mid-majors and have lost.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: kim carnes on March 22, 2013, 04:40:29 PM
If you like unathletic guards who suck, angel is great
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: OregonSmock on March 22, 2013, 04:40:44 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Shacks on March 22, 2013, 04:42:27 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Sounds similar to KU fans trash talking KSU football for losing big bowl games while KU football hasn't won a conference game since 2010
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: GCJayhawker on March 22, 2013, 04:43:00 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Sounds similar to KU fans trash talking KSU football for losing big bowl games while KU football hasn't won a conference game since 2010

It is similar.  I wouldn't expect either fanbase not to talk trash to the other.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: timhawk on March 22, 2013, 04:43:08 PM
Angel has never been as good as #teamAngel wants him to be.  He cost us this game.

LOL angel is horrible...Lasalle? LOL

While I agree that Angel was horrible today, what is absurd is any ku fan talking about 1st round losses.    You guys took teams full of McD AA's into 1st round games against mid-majors and have lost.

yea but not in KC LOL
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: CHONGS on March 22, 2013, 04:43:59 PM
trolls gonna troll, and

that's goEMAW.com
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 04:44:48 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Oh, here comes the K-State obsessed ku fan to glout, what a surprise.   It was easy to talk crap on ku because ku fans always acted like all ku had to do was show up and the game was over. 




Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 04:45:54 PM
Great players have bad games sometimes. :dunno:
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: OregonSmock on March 22, 2013, 04:46:09 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: timhawk on March 22, 2013, 04:47:12 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Oh, here comes the K-State obsessed ku fan to glout, what a surprise.   It was easy to talk crap on ku because ku fans always acted like all ku had to do was show up and the game was over.
I've taken crap from Kstate for KU first round losses so take it...LASALLE EXPLORERS!!!
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 04:47:47 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: CHONGS on March 22, 2013, 04:48:38 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: deputy dawg on March 22, 2013, 04:48:51 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

 :bait:
Title: Angel sucks
Post by: Grogan14 on March 22, 2013, 04:49:19 PM
Sad part is he's right.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: kim carnes on March 22, 2013, 04:49:37 PM
Great players have bad games sometimes. :dunno:

You have to be out of your rough ridin' mind to think be is great.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 04:50:03 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 04:50:40 PM
Great players have bad games sometimes. :dunno:

He's not a great player.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: kim carnes on March 22, 2013, 04:51:05 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

No
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: CHONGS on March 22, 2013, 04:51:36 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.
meh, our fans started using lame football crap on the bball board a long time ago.  we deserve every lame-ass troll we get.  it's basically all we do anyway
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Shacks on March 22, 2013, 04:51:36 PM
Great players have bad games sometimes. :dunno:

He's not a great player.

Agreed, but he was put in a really shitty spot at the end of the game by his terrible coach sitting on the final timeout
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 04:52:26 PM
Great players have bad games sometimes. :dunno:

He's not a great player.

Agreed, but he was put in a really shitty spot at the end of the game by his terrible coach sitting on the final timeout
false he is regularly allowed to iso on the top at the end of the half
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: timhawk on March 22, 2013, 04:56:48 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.

oh shut up...how many times on here have I heard KSTATE FOOTBALL and then when he points out that we have 3 bowl wins since your last one you get butt hurt...pathetic. go Lasalle!
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 04:58:01 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.

oh shut up...how many times on here have I heard KSTATE FOOTBALL and then we he points out that we have 3 bowl wins since your last one you get butt hurt...pathetic. go Lasalle!

oscar Weber is better at coaching than you are at message boarding.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 04:58:48 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 04:59:00 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.

oh shut up...how many times on here have I heard KSTATE FOOTBALL and then we he points out that we have 3 bowl wins since your last one you get butt hurt...pathetic. go Lasalle!

Because how relevant is that in the face of 20 consecutive conference losses, losses in 26 out of the last 32 conference games, and 4 consecutive last place finishes??

Go back to phog.net or kusports.com or the slant if you're just going to be a dumbass.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 04:59:37 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.

He had a scared game, not a bad game.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Super PurpleCat on March 22, 2013, 04:59:50 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Beems has a solid point here. 
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 05:00:48 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: timhawk on March 22, 2013, 05:01:38 PM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.

oh shut up...how many times on here have I heard KSTATE FOOTBALL and then we he points out that we have 3 bowl wins since your last one you get butt hurt...pathetic. go Lasalle!

oscar Weber is better at coaching than you are at message boarding.

lol his great coaching showed today. Angel played like ass and he should have kept his ugly ass on the bench at the end
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 05:02:02 PM
Lol Dax... you clowns talked endless amounts of crap on KU all of those years while you sat at home with Wooldridge.  You never have room to trash KU, but you do anyway.  Deal with it.

Beems has a solid point here.

Most people on this board, when we talk trash on ku, do it on a K-State message board.   I could roll up one sock after another, change my screen name 4 or 5 times (sound familiar?) and run to the ku boards to troll, but I don't.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 05:03:16 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 05:04:27 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 05:05:08 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.
Whatever dude.  These meltdown threads have happened every time Angel has had a bad game.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: kso_FAN on March 22, 2013, 05:05:28 PM
He had a very good season and was at worst our co-best player most of the season. Tonight wasn't his best night.

And we need him to be really, really good next year.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 05:05:52 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?


It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 05:06:58 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.
Whatever dude.  These meltdown threads have happened every time Angel has had a bad game.

When Angel has a bad game, we lose. He is the most important piece to the K-State puzzle, and it's not even close. And we won 27 games because of him. If you want to crap all over him like you did Pullen, that's fine by me. We all remember how that worked out for you last time.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 05:07:05 PM
and look at how he has played in the big game, specifically tourney time and KU.  Now step back.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 05:10:22 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?


It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.

Good, he's pretty good, but I won't call a guy who is a combined 3 for 18 in the Big 12 Championship game, and the 1st round of the NCAA tourney, with 6 turnovers very good, and certainly not great.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 05:10:49 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?


It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.

Good, he's pretty good, but I won't call a guy who is a combined 3 for 18 in the Big 12 Championship game, and the 1st round of the NCAA tourney, with 6 turnovers very good, and certainly not great.



hey man even LeBron has bad games.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 05:12:17 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?


It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.

Good, he's pretty good, but I won't call a guy who is a combined 3 for 18 in the Big 12 Championship game, and the 1st round of the NCAA tourney, with 6 turnovers very good, and certainly not great.



hey man even LeBron has bad games.
Eject Dax, Rusty has gone full delusional.
Title: Angel sucks
Post by: puniraptor on March 22, 2013, 05:12:31 PM
So... Combo season.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 05:13:53 PM
So... Combo season.

Yes, very excited. I have all kinds of small talk topics I've been saving up for when there was nothing else to talk about.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 22, 2013, 05:16:13 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season. 


He might win games, but he also loses games.  Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?

What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.

How rational is callling ArT "Great"?


It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.

Good, he's pretty good, but I won't call a guy who is a combined 3 for 18 in the Big 12 Championship game, and the 1st round of the NCAA tourney, with 6 turnovers very good, and certainly not great.



hey man even LeBron has bad games.

LOL . . . okay there cRusty, I'll entertain this absurdity.   How many times in a collective "bad game" for LeBron does he, at some point have a major positive impact for his team?   While I am not the biggest NBA fan, it seems that most of the time actual GREAT players like Lebron have a significant postive impact during the course of the game, even in the midst of an overall "bad" game by their standards.    There was really nothing positive about ArT in the last 2 games of significance for K-State.

He's pretty good, he's got a long way to go before he's great.





Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 22, 2013, 05:17:39 PM
well, agree to disagree.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Stevesie60 on March 22, 2013, 05:18:08 PM
There's no way you think Rusty's standard for "great" is Lebron James.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: ednksu on March 22, 2013, 05:20:28 PM
There's no way you think Rusty's standard for "great" is Lebron James.
The problem is the scale of comparison. No logical person should even have them in the same breath.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Bloodfart on March 22, 2013, 05:27:24 PM
So... Combo season.

Yes, very excited. I have all kinds of small talk topics I've been saving up for when there was nothing else to talk about.

The scrubs thread!  :love:
Title: Angel sucks
Post by: Grogan14 on March 23, 2013, 11:53:26 AM
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.
meh, our fans started using lame football crap on the bball board a long time ago.  we deserve every lame-ass troll we get.  it's basically all we do anyway

Now you're starting to make sense
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sys on March 23, 2013, 02:30:35 PM
art has a torn ligament in his wrist as well as whatever his knee problem is.  he was 2nd team all big 12 in a year he wasn't really healthy all year.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 23, 2013, 02:31:57 PM
art has a torn ligament in his wrist as well as whatever his knee problem is.  he was 2nd team all big 12 in a year he wasn't really healthy all year.

Only emphasizing the need to recruit quality guard depth and supplant Spradling out of the starting lineup and well down the bench.

Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: sys on March 23, 2013, 02:42:15 PM
emphasizing the need to recruit quality guard depth and supplant Spradling out of the starting lineup and well down the bench.

yes, pg depth was something of an issue this year, and next year with no irving, it is a definite concern. 
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: JKEYS on March 23, 2013, 08:37:19 PM
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Katpappy on March 23, 2013, 09:37:03 PM
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
All these posters, and only one with a rational reason.  Thx. Rusty.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: Pett on March 23, 2013, 09:47:55 PM
He had his worst game of the season. Give him a break
Title: Re: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 23, 2013, 09:48:24 PM
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.

Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.
Title: Re: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: JKEYS on March 23, 2013, 09:52:14 PM
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.


Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.


Nobody considered sophomore Pullen "great" though.  This is a terrible speaking point.  Not giving in though huh?  LOL
Title: Re: Re: Re: Angel sucks
Post by: michigancat on March 23, 2013, 10:03:14 PM
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.


Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.


Nobody considered sophomore Pullen "great" though.  This is a terrible speaking point.  Not giving in though huh?  LOL

like I said earlier, I'll accept it if someone thinks Angel is only "very good".