goemaw.com

General Discussion => Essentially Flyertalk => Topic started by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 08:53:58 AM

Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 08:53:58 AM
Alright, who's got the scoop on the massive Hunan Express building on the east end of Aggieville? 

Primarily, why is the facade cinderblock?  No brick, like every other building in Aggieville.  surely, cinderblock isn't the finished product? 

Also, noticed they had a bunch of guys working on the roof Monday night.  rooftop patio?   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2013, 09:00:21 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:11:38 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.

Wow.  don't these things have to proceed through the city council before permits are awarded?  How the eff does a cinderblock building make it through...
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 20, 2013, 09:13:45 AM
I don't think it looks bad at all. Hunam looks cool. There are plenty of dogshit looking bldgs in aggieville, its not like there is some unified design.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: camKSU on February 20, 2013, 09:20:09 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.

Wow.  don't these things have to proceed through the city council before permits are awarded?  How the eff does a cinderblock building make it through...

Belvis, I don't disagree that a red brick building would have fit into the context of the aggieville street-scape more...

But to say that every building decision should pass through the city council for approval is a little ridiculous and quite frankly fascist. Not to mention the fact that the built environment is an ever changing and evolving patch work of different looking buildings. Aggieville is not mayberry or mainstreet, usa.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:23:40 AM
I don't think it looks bad at all. Hunam looks cool. There are plenty of dogshit looking bldgs in aggieville, its not like there is some unified design.

The ground level on Moro looks alright, but the cinderblock facade is a disaster.  There is, generally a unified brick design in Aggieville. 

I was reading through the Minutes regarding the N. Manhattan Hotel that's being built on Bluemont/Manhattan and the City Council was adamant that they incorporate the limestone from Campus and the brick from Aggieville, so that it melded the two areas.  Oddly, nowhere did CC mention incorporating exposed cinderblock.  That 4-story residential building looks like crap w/o a brick/stone facade, unless it's a Section 8 project.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2013, 09:24:05 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.

Wow.  don't these things have to proceed through the city council before permits are awarded?  How the eff does a cinderblock building make it through...

Belvis, I don't disagree that a red brick building would have fit into the context of the aggieville street-scape more...

But to say that every building decision should pass through the city council for approval is a little ridiculous and quite frankly fascist. Not to mention the fact that the built environment is an ever changing and evolving patch work of different looking buildings. Aggieville is not mayberry or mainstreet, usa.

Well that is pretty much how most cities work.  If that is facist then, well...
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 20, 2013, 09:26:29 AM
I don't think it looks bad at all. Hunam looks cool. There are plenty of dogshit looking bldgs in aggieville, its not like there is some unified design.

The ground level on Moro looks alright, but the cinderblock facade is a disaster.  There is, generally a unified brick design in Aggieville. 

I was reading through the Minutes regarding the N. Manhattan Hotel that's being built on Bluemont/Manhattan and the City Council was adamant that they incorporate the limestone from Campus and the brick from Aggieville, so that it melded the two areas.  Oddly, nowhere did CC mention incorporating exposed cinderblock.  That 4-story residential building looks like crap w/o a brick/stone facade, unless it's a Section 8 project.

I guess I can agree with that. The chain link over the stairwells and balconies really drives home the projekts theme.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:27:02 AM

But to say that every building decision should pass through the city council for approval is a little ridiculous and quite frankly fascist.


Rightly or wrongly, the project has to obtain permits through the City and, accordingly, is subject to scrutiny.  In a destination district like Aggieville, I would expect a little higher level scrutiny. 

I'm not saying they need to clad it in marble.  I'm just a little surprised cinderblock got the thumbs up. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2013, 09:31:37 AM
There are quite a few buildings with non brick facades, especially on the north side of Moro (O'Malley's, Pat's, everything west of Johnny KKKaws, some others.) Also, the last time google did a street view update on Moro, Daylight Donuts was open.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ksucrcoop on February 20, 2013, 09:32:12 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.

Been dreaming of one of these in the ville for a long long time.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 20, 2013, 09:35:05 AM
They need to combine wabash and hunan specials. like order 15 drinks and get a free buffet next door
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2013, 09:36:10 AM
They need to combine wabash and hunan specials. like order 15 drinks and get a free buffet next door

Underrated Aggieville deal: $2 domestic bottles at Hunam.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: camKSU on February 20, 2013, 09:38:00 AM
Kevin Chen, the owner of Hunam, built and owns the building that houses Hunam, the apartments behind/above it, and the bar next door which will be called Wabash.  Wabash will have a rooftop patio, and until we saw them removing it at the pre-pak on Saturday, there was a sign on the front that said "Wabash: coming in February."  I doubt they will be open that soon, but I'd imagine they are trying pretty hard to be open for Fake Pat's. I believe that the current facade is indeed the permanent facade.

Wow.  don't these things have to proceed through the city council before permits are awarded?  How the eff does a cinderblock building make it through...

Belvis, I don't disagree that a red brick building would have fit into the context of the aggieville street-scape more...

But to say that every building decision should pass through the city council for approval is a little ridiculous and quite frankly fascist. Not to mention the fact that the built environment is an ever changing and evolving patch work of different looking buildings. Aggieville is not mayberry or mainstreet, usa.

Well that is pretty much how most cities work.  If that is facist then, well...

Not true. They usually pass through the city's building department for code review for a building permit, which is to say they are reviewed for health, safety and welfare... not aesthetics. Usually aesthetics are only reviewed for historic considerations, which the demolished building that was here was not. The city, in most cases, cannot tell you what your building should look like.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:40:26 AM
There are quite a few buildings with non brick facades, especially on the north side of Moro (O'Malley's, Pat's, everything west of Johnny KKKaws, some others.) Also, the last time google did a street view update on Moro, Daylight Donuts was open.

Basically, the entirety of Moro, between Manhattan and 11th, is brick.  A few buildings, scattered throughout, use some other cladding.  O'Malley's (wood), Dusty Bookshelf (brick/limestone).  Pat's is actually painted brick, I think.

All new construction has been brick - Tasty China House and the Wahoo Fire and Ice building.   



Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:48:27 AM

Not true. They usually pass through the city's building department for code review for a building permit, which is to say they are reviewed for health, safety and welfare... not aesthetics. Usually aesthetics are only reviewed for historic considerations, which the demolished building that was here was not. The city, in most cases, cannot tell you what your building should look like.


The City can kill a project if it doesn't comport with the guidelines set out in the aggieville master plan.  aesthetic or otherwise.  again, the aesthetics of the N.Manhattan hotel were heavily scrutinized prior to approval.  The Hunan Express project is in the footprint of the Campus Edge masterplan and shouldn've been subject to the same level of scrutiny. 

"The Aggieville - Campus Edge District Plan supplements the Manhattan Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and provides more focused and specific guidance for the location, type, and design of private development within the campus edge redevelopment area and the Aggieville commercial district. The Future Land Use Map contained in the Aggieville - Campus Edge District Plan is used in conjunction with the written goals, principles, and policy recommendations contained in the district plan to guide decision making and when considering redevelopment proposals in the area."  http://www.cityofmhk.com/index.aspx?NID=498

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 09:49:14 AM
campus edge master plan:

http://www.cityofmhk.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/791
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: pissclams on February 20, 2013, 10:02:07 AM
usually a city planning commission would review the building design which would include any aesthetic concerns.  if there is any issue, the final approval decision may get punted to the main council for their final review.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 11:22:31 AM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 11:49:25 AM
I think belvis has a bright future ahead of him being an angry Mhk townie.  Bob Strawn will have a bear to deal with in 10 years.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 20, 2013, 11:51:38 AM
I think belvis has a bright future ahead of him being an angry Mhk townie.  Bob Strawn will have a bear to deal with in 10 years.

aaaaawww yeeeeeaaah
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 12:08:20 PM
I think belvis has a bright future ahead of him being an angry Mhk townie.  Bob Strawn will have a bear to deal with in 10 years.

aaaaawww yeeeeeaaah

Show of hands, do people like the new design of the West Side at BSFS?  Would you like it as much if it were made of wood?  Or cinderblocks? 

Right, probably not.  because it would look like crap.  And every time you went to a football game, you'd probably say to yourself, hmmmm, that building looks like crap.

That's me in this thread.  But, instead of BSFS, I'm talking about a 4 story project (literally a housing project) in the middle of Aggieville. 

   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Skipper44 on February 20, 2013, 12:26:50 PM
I think belvis has a bright future ahead of him being an angry Mhk townie.  Bob Strawn will have a bear to deal with in 10 years.

aaaaawww yeeeeeaaah
bncats?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on February 20, 2013, 12:43:34 PM
Maybe this is the city taking a shot at aggieville and showing it how much the city hates it.  Trash Orgies? = Cinderblocks approved!!!!!
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on February 20, 2013, 03:52:17 PM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.

As always, great perspective.

Architectural review for planning and zoning is on the whole very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Just build what you want, where you want, no matter what it looks like and no matter how well it is compatible with the surrounding urban fabric.  If it sucks ass, the next guy will fix it.

 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 03:55:33 PM
i think the "housing project" looks fine.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:04:28 PM
I think belvis has a bright future ahead of him being an angry Mhk townie.  Bob Strawn will have a bear to deal with in 10 years.

aaaaawww yeeeeeaaah

Show of hands, do people like the new design of the West Side at BSFS?  Would you like it as much if it were made of wood?  Or cinderblocks? 

Right, probably not.  because it would look like crap.  And every time you went to a football game, you'd probably say to yourself, hmmmm, that building looks like crap.

That's me in this thread.  But, instead of BSFS, I'm talking about a 4 story project (literally a housing project) in the middle of Aggieville. 

   

I think people griping about the look of a building they actually donated money toward is much more valid than their gripes about how somebody's self-funded business looks.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:05:14 PM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.

As always, great perspective.

Architectural review for planning and zoning is on the whole very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Just build what you want, where you want, no matter what it looks like and no matter how well it is compatible with the surrounding urban fabric.  If it sucks ass, the next guy will fix it.

Well, yeah, people doing what they want usually turns out for the best.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:11:33 PM
You know what's going to look like complete ass next year? That hospital across the street from our new badass stadium facade. Maybe the city should contact them and make them put up some limestone towers or something.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on February 20, 2013, 04:12:44 PM
I'm sure there are other places that have people who are so concerned with stuff like this, but I've never encountered it anywhere else.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:17:10 PM
You know what's going to look like complete ass next year? That hospital across the street from our new badass stadium facade. Maybe the city should contact them and make them put up some limestone towers or something.

Well, that's a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) example, but you already knew that.   :facepalm:

but, for instance, say that very same hospital said, "ya know what?  we're not going to have windows or fire escapes."  What's wrong with that? 

Or, what if the hospital was made of corrugated metal?  and the developer said eff the landscaping and just left the entire 10 acre parcel as a dirt?  I guess you wouldn't have a legitimate gripe because the hospital was privately funded? 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:20:00 PM
I'm sure there are other places that have people who are so concerned with stuff like this, but I've never encountered it anywhere else.

Trust me, there is a crazy bizarro-world where people actually care about architecture and design. 

In fact, if you walk over to Seaton Hall or the Engineering complex, you may just meet some of these whacky people. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:20:25 PM
You know what's going to look like complete ass next year? That hospital across the street from our new badass stadium facade. Maybe the city should contact them and make them put up some limestone towers or something.

Well, that's a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) example, but you already knew that.   :facepalm:

but, for instance, say that very same hospital said, "ya know what?  we're not going to have windows or fire escapes."  What's wrong with that? 

Or, what if the hospital was made of corrugated metal?  and the developer said eff the landscaping and just left the entire 10 acre parcel as a dirt?  I guess you wouldn't have a legitimate gripe because the hospital was privately funded?

both of those things would be illegal and has nothing to do with what you're talking about.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:22:07 PM
You know what's going to look like complete ass next year? That hospital across the street from our new badass stadium facade. Maybe the city should contact them and make them put up some limestone towers or something.

Well, that's a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) example, but you already knew that.   :facepalm:

but, for instance, say that very same hospital said, "ya know what?  we're not going to have windows or fire escapes."  What's wrong with that? 

Or, what if the hospital was made of corrugated metal?  and the developer said eff the landscaping and just left the entire 10 acre parcel as a dirt?  I guess you wouldn't have a legitimate gripe because the hospital was privately funded?

Let's just thank God the City of Manhattan stepped in and stopped that hospital from constructing their building out of corrugated metal. :lol:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on February 20, 2013, 04:24:36 PM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.

As always, great perspective.

Architectural review for planning and zoning is on the whole very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Just build what you want, where you want, no matter what it looks like and no matter how well it is compatible with the surrounding urban fabric.  If it sucks ass, the next guy will fix it.

Well, yeah, people doing what they want usually turns out for the best.


Totally.

If it doesn't work out the next guy will fix it.




Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:25:33 PM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.

As always, great perspective.

Architectural review for planning and zoning is on the whole very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Just build what you want, where you want, no matter what it looks like and no matter how well it is compatible with the surrounding urban fabric.  If it sucks ass, the next guy will fix it.

Well, yeah, people doing what they want usually turns out for the best.


Totally.

If it doesn't work out the next guy will fix it.

The fittest will survive without you and the government telling them how to do it.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:26:07 PM
Also, I propose a little game.  Everybody post pictures of your favorite cinder block buildings and we'll pick a winner.   :drool:

Imagine this, but purple.  It would be PERFECT as student housing.  Ideally, in a prominent spot on campus.   

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa279%2Fmirak%2Fcinder_zpsfbc979db.jpg&hash=fd26f4b1a4f560d4ffbef6acfff24238bdc7c2af)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:31:18 PM
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on February 20, 2013, 04:33:11 PM
I would imagine the city has better things to worry about than to tell a guy who wants to run a Chinese restaurant and a bar, of all operations, what his building can look like. JFC, people. If the cinderblock design bothers people so much, they just won't go there, the business will close, and the next owner will make it more aesthetically appealing.

As always, great perspective.

Architectural review for planning and zoning is on the whole very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Just build what you want, where you want, no matter what it looks like and no matter how well it is compatible with the surrounding urban fabric.  If it sucks ass, the next guy will fix it.

Well, yeah, people doing what they want usually turns out for the best.


Totally.

If it doesn't work out the next guy will fix it.

The fittest will survive without you and the government telling them how to do it.


Stop being a dumbass.




Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:34:09 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.improvisedlife.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F06%2Fstudio-1-b-brighter1.jpg&hash=c73934986eb3ea003c02041fcacfc6509f71f798)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:35:00 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.improvisedlife.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F06%2Fstudio-1-b-brighter1.jpg&hash=c73934986eb3ea003c02041fcacfc6509f71f798)

is that what wabash will look like?  will take  :thumbs:  :excited:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:35:10 PM

both of those things would be illegal and has nothing to do with what you're talking about.


They're illegal because laws and codes have been enacted by the federal, state and municipal governments specifically to prevent developers from just "doing what they want."  It's called codes enforcement. 

This happens in neighborhoods and condo buildings too.  If you lived in a nice neighborhood, for instance, you might be aware of such ordinances.  For example, a homes association may prevent somebody from building, say hypothetically, a cinder block house with a chain link fence around.  May look perfectly fine in Afghanistan.  Maybe not Leawood. 

Well, cities are the same way.  Perhaps there's an important district like an arts district, historic district, or cultural district.  Say the City wants to protect the integrity of the district so that it maintains its character.  (crazy I know).  Well, the City may impose restrictions and regulations for future designs so that development doesn't destroy the district's character.

I am perfectly OK with such restrictions.  You are apparently not.  I just pray that more people in power agree with me than with you.  Otherwise, Manhattan could be very similar to Junction City.   

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:39:07 PM

both of those things would be illegal and has nothing to do with what you're talking about.


They're illegal because laws and codes have been enacted by the federal, state and municipal governments specifically to prevent developers from just "doing what they want."  It's called codes enforcement. 

This happens in neighborhoods and condo buildings too.  If you lived in a nice neighborhood, for instance, you might be aware of such ordinances.  For example, a homes association may prevent somebody from building, say hypothetically, a cinder block house with a chain link fence around.  May look perfectly fine in Afghanistan.  Maybe not Leawood. 

Well, cities are the same way.  Perhaps there's an important district like an arts district, historic district, or cultural district.  Say the City wants to protect the integrity of the district so that it maintains its character.  (crazy I know).  Well, the City may impose restrictions and regulations for future designs so that development doesn't destroy the district's character.

I am perfectly OK with such restrictions.  You are apparently not.  I just pray that more people in power agree with me than with you.  Otherwise, Manhattan could be very similar to Junction City.   

they are illegal because of human safety, not because of aesthetics.

and if you move into an HOA area, then you know that going into it and you abide by those rules.

jesus christ, you are an angry man.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:40:47 PM
Linked is an article "Rebuilding Haiti, one cinder block at a time."  With Pictures. 

http://www.sbcv.org/articles/detail/rebuilding_haiti_one_cinder_block_at_a_time

Cinder blocks are great in Third World Countries.....  and Aggieville!   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:43:24 PM
I would have to see a photo of this building to see how bad it actually looks. If it looks dilapidated and run down as Belvis is suggesting, I'm sure it will be out of businaaaaaassss within the year and somebody else will make it look nice.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:46:24 PM
it looks fine, he's making a big deal out of nothing.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:47:13 PM

they are illegal because of human safety, not because of aesthetics.

and if you move into an HOA area, then you know that going into it and you abide by those rules.

jesus christ, you are an angry man.


My point, from the beginning, is that the City should treat Manhattan like a neighborhood and create rules like an HOA would.  The City should impose rules in the Aggieville Business District that provide for aesthetic requirements, just like a neighborhood would.  In fact, they already did this.  See the Campus Edge Master Plan.  This is why I was a bit surprised to see a cinder block project erected in the middle of Aggieville.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:47:56 PM
it looks fine, he's making a big deal out of nothing.
That was my assumption.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:49:12 PM
I would have to see a photo of this building to see how bad it actually looks. If it looks dilapidated and run down as Belvis is suggesting, I'm sure it will be out of businaaaaaassss within the year and somebody else will make it look nice.

Again, it's a 4-story cinderblock residential tower (a project) with chain link fence on the backside.  It's ridiculously ugly. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:51:00 PM
I thought it was a Hunan Express with a rooftop bar.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:51:20 PM

they are illegal because of human safety, not because of aesthetics.

and if you move into an HOA area, then you know that going into it and you abide by those rules.

jesus christ, you are an angry man.


My point, from the beginning, is that the City should treat Manhattan like a neighborhood and create rules like an HOA would.  The City should impose rules in the Aggieville Business District that provide for aesthetic requirements, just like a neighborhood would.  In fact, they already did this.  See the Campus Edge Master Plan.  This is why I was a bit surprised to see a cinder block project erected in the middle of Aggieville.   

maybe you should be complaining to the aggieville business owners to get a historic district enacted or something instead.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:52:01 PM
it looks fine, he's making a big deal out of nothing.
That was my assumption.

Why do you assume that a cinder block residential tower looks fine?  Have you ever seen one before?  Do you see any cinder block buildings on campus?  around Manhattan? 

Clearly rhetorical.  Ask yourself why you don't see these buildings. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:53:20 PM
it looks fine, he's making a big deal out of nothing.
That was my assumption.

Why do you assume that a cinder block residential tower looks fine?  Have you ever seen one before?  Do you see any cinder block buildings on campus?  around Manhattan? 

Clearly rhetorical.  Ask yourself why you don't see these buildings.

I assume that because nobody in their right mind is going to spend the money on property in Aggieville only to put up some shitty cinder block shanty.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:53:29 PM
I thought it was a Hunan Express with a rooftop bar.

That's the front part of the parcel, a single story portion of the development.  behind it looms a 4-story residential building.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 04:56:45 PM

maybe you should be complaining to the aggieville business owners to get a historic district enacted or something instead.


Yeah, I should be complaining to the Manhattan City Council, but this is an internet message board. 

It's like bbsing about sports on here.  I mean, really, our gripes should be directed to LHC Bill Snyder and oscar Weber, amirite?   

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 04:59:19 PM
This webpage is amazing. :lol:

http://fancyhomedesign.net/cinder-block-homes/ (http://fancyhomedesign.net/cinder-block-homes/)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2013, 04:59:47 PM
I thought it was a Hunan Express with a rooftop bar.

That's the front part of the parcel, a single story portion of the development.  behind it looms a 4-story residential building.   

and you don't even notice it from moro.  the only time you even noticed the "projects" is driving down 11th, you see it for a moment.  and it's a modern look with galvanized fences, not a shantytown.  in fact, until you even mentioned it here i didn't even know it was a block building because i don't spend my time staring at apartments that are basically in an aggieville ally.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 20, 2013, 05:01:24 PM
If it's still under construction, isn't it sort of likely that the building might have some kind of facade placed over the cinder blocks to make it look better?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: FuzzyWuzzy on February 20, 2013, 05:01:35 PM
This webpage is amazing. :lol:

http://fancyhomedesign.net/cinder-block-homes/ (http://fancyhomedesign.net/cinder-block-homes/)

oh gawd the writing
Quote
Cinder Block Homes are a bit not save and also have loads of minus than the plus side.

Quote
Cinder Block Homes are more less likely to experience a great damage if a fire occurs

Quote
In particular side, they are typically do not have any problems with termites as many wooden homes do.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: FuzzyWuzzy on February 20, 2013, 05:02:32 PM

maybe you should be complaining to the aggieville business owners to get a historic district enacted or something instead.


Yeah, I should be complaining to the Manhattan City Council, but this is an internet message board. 

It's like bbsing about sports on here.  I mean, really, our gripes should be directed to LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and oscar Weber, amirite?   

here's their contact info:  http://www.cityofmhk.com/index.aspx?NID=219
tell them i don't want to look at where poor people live either

and the aggieville business improvement district http://www.cityofmhk.com/index.aspx?NID=446 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 05:03:33 PM
If it's still under construction, isn't it sort of likely that the building might have some kind of facade placed over the cinder blocks to make it look better?

Yeah, that was sort of my question in the first post in this thread.  It was explained that this is a finished project. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 05:07:15 PM
the building is on google maps
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 20, 2013, 05:16:14 PM

maybe you should be complaining to the aggieville business owners to get a historic district enacted or something instead.


Yeah, I should be complaining to the Manhattan City Council, but this is an internet message board. 

It's like bbsing about sports on here.  I mean, really, our gripes should be directed to LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and oscar Weber, amirite?   

here's their contact info:  http://www.cityofmhk.com/index.aspx?NID=219
tell them i don't want to look at where poor people live either

and the aggieville business improvement district http://www.cityofmhk.com/index.aspx?NID=446

just emailed Karen Davis of the AV BID.  I'll let you guys know what she says.   :ohno:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 21, 2013, 11:11:39 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecentraloffice.com%2Fmissouri%2Fpyvlmo.jpg&hash=3a9637d014eefe4be91c990031c762926942e529)
Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: camKSU on February 22, 2013, 07:06:26 AM
A few examples of CMU used aesthetically...

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on February 22, 2013, 08:24:12 AM
Haven't seen the building, but if it uglifies Manhattan then I'm on #teambelvis.

I'm an aesthetics fascist apparently.  I'd rather have aesthetic requirements be imposed in all building projects (in the places I care about).
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 22, 2013, 08:45:46 AM
Haven't seen the building, but if it uglifies Manhattan then I'm on #teambelvis.

I'm an aesthetics fascist apparently.  I'd rather have aesthetic requirements be imposed in all building projects (in the places I care about).

You won't ever get anything really unique with aesthetic requirements. I don't want a red brick requirement for all buildings in Aggieville, and if we end up with one cinder block monstrosity as a result, then so be it. It's not a big deal.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Kat Kid on February 22, 2013, 08:48:07 AM
Haven't seen the building, but if it uglifies Manhattan then I'm on #teambelvis.

I'm an aesthetics fascist apparently.  I'd rather have aesthetic requirements be imposed in all building projects (in the places I care about).

You won't every get anything really unique with aesthetic requirements. I don't want a red brick requirement for all buildings in Aggieville, and if we end up with one cinder block monstrosity as a result, then so be it. It's not a big deal.

Aesthetics are up for debate.  He has a different side in this debate.  I'm glad we're moving toward a point in this discussion where both sides admit that there are alternative viewpoints.  I mean Belvis is kind of forced to acknowledge the opposition, because it is four stories high and all cinder blocky, but it is good to see none the less.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 22, 2013, 09:55:39 AM
The Aggieville - Campus Edge District Plan was adopted by the Manhattan Urban Area Planning Board by resolution following a public hearing August 2005. The City Commission adopted the plan by Ordinance No. 6498 October 2005.

Goal #3:  "Create a Distinct Identity Throughout the Built Environment:  Create a distinctive identity, and develop the Aggieville-Campus Edge Area into a unique neighborhood through the overall composition of spaces, juxtaposition of buildings and public realm and special architectural character and details."

Principle:  Spatially define the street spaces by developing buildings at the front property line. For street-facing building facades, provide human scale and visual interest through change in plane, and architectural detailing and intricacy in form, color, and materials that are sensitive to the historical character of the district."

Summary:  "Individual building façade elements shall respect the rhythm, floor heights and scale of immediately adjacent and surrounding building elements." 
• Building facade elements shall create strong patterns of light and shadow.
• Facades shall incorporate the use of several building materials with complimentary color, texture and placement with primary emphasis on masonry and/or stone materials. "
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 22, 2013, 09:59:05 AM
I just want businesses to follow the Aggieville Campus Edge parameters adopted by City ordinance. 

If cinder block is a "special architectural detail" and is "masonry and/or stone material" and is "sensitive to the historical character of the district" then I have no problem with cinder block.  However, when viewed reasonably, I think we'd all agree that cinder block is none of these things. 

Therefore, I don't think it should have been used or approved by the City.  I hope this doesn't come across as fascist. 

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 22, 2013, 10:04:20 AM
I think you could make a pretty solid case that cinder blocks fall under masonry.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 22, 2013, 10:20:26 AM
I think you could make a pretty solid case that cinder blocks fall under masonry.

you sure could, NK.  you sure could. 

special architectural character and details?  No.   

architectural detailing and intricacy in form, color, and materials?  No. 

sensitive to the historical character of the district?  No. 

respect the immediately adjacent and surrounding building elements?  No.   

several building materials with complimentary color, texture and placement?  No. 

But, yes, you are absolutely correct that a cinder block could technically be classified as masonry. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 22, 2013, 11:18:16 AM

special architectural character and details?  No.   


How do you define "special"?

Quote from: Belvis

architectural detailing and intricacy in form, color, and materials?  No. 


I still haven't seen a finished product, so it's hard to say.

Quote from: Belvis

sensitive to the historical character of the district?  No. 


What historical character?

Quote from: Belvis

respect the immediately adjacent and surrounding building elements?  No.   


Are the immediately adjacent property owners filing complaints?

Quote from: Belvis

several building materials with complimentary color, texture and placement?  No. 


Again, the building is still under construction and we don't really know what the finished product will look like.

If the city forced this property owner to acknowledge the city's plan and sign some sort of contract when he purchased the land, then I agree that he should have to meet the city's guidelines for Aggieville aesthetics. If they did not, then I don't really agree with them telling him what he can and cannot do with his own property aesthetically.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 22, 2013, 11:28:40 AM
the guy who is opening wabash bar and grill is my old boss from iTAC.  he makes great burgers and sandwiches.  rooftop patio is going to be tits.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 22, 2013, 11:46:18 AM
NK, I feel like you're being intentionally Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  Correct me if I'm wrong. 

It was represented at the beginning of the thread that cinder block was the final product.  I'm operating on this assumption.

My gripe is with the City not requiring compliance with the Aggieville Master Plan prior to issuing construction permits.  If the City was silent on the issue, I agree it would be ridiculous for them to come back, after the fact, and request him to pay for something else.  It's like any other district, be it the Country Club Plaza, Westport, Mass Street, Pearl Street, etc.  They all have architectural standards and non-confirming building are not allowed.  If the City allows a non-comfirming building, then that's their problem, not the developer's.   

In summary, I don't have a problem with the developer.  I have a problem with the City letting the developer move ahead with this cinder block plan. 

But, there's no point in debating it.  We obviously don't see eye to eye.  it is what it is. 


Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on February 22, 2013, 12:00:32 PM
Belvis, the city commission is a bunch of small timey busybodies who impede the city's growth due to concerns about things like Home Depot looking too orange.  They are way more fussy about this stuff than you are.  You've got no worries.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on February 22, 2013, 12:08:10 PM
TTIWWOP :ksu:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 22, 2013, 05:30:20 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ChiComCat on February 22, 2013, 05:56:21 PM
I don't see it on google maps.  Post a picture Belvis, its the best way to drum up support
Title: Re: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on February 22, 2013, 06:11:35 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

wow, is that real? What incredible dumbfucks.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on February 22, 2013, 06:16:52 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

This is just laugh out loud stupidity and small timyness.

I mean JFC, like the P&L, or Westport, or Pearl Street or Mass doesn't "get rowdy" on a weekend night. 

Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 22, 2013, 06:30:32 PM
Benches?


Aaah Yeeeahh
Time to eff
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ednksu on February 22, 2013, 07:08:22 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

This is just laugh out loud stupidity and small timyness.

I mean JFC, like the P&L, or Westport, or Pearl Street or Mass doesn't "get rowdy" on a weekend night.
In fairness they are 100% right, think Fake Patty's Day.  The problem is the city has allowed the inmate bar owners to run the asylum (Aggieville).
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 22, 2013, 07:18:55 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

This is just laugh out loud stupidity and small timyness.

I mean JFC, like the P&L, or Westport, or Pearl Street or Mass doesn't "get rowdy" on a weekend night.
In fairness they are 100% right, think Fake Patty's Day.  The problem is the city has allowed the inmate bar owners to run the asylum (Aggieville).

In what way?  What exactly are you calling a "problem"?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 22, 2013, 07:42:58 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

lmao, perfect
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ednksu on February 22, 2013, 08:04:19 PM

In what way?  What exactly are you calling a "problem"?
The issue for Fake is the horrible costs of maintaining security and medical services for that day in the community and specifically the Aggie area and the surrounding few blocks.  Also there have been several groups who are trying to shut down the celebrations because the Aggieville businesses refuse to pay their fair share for the costs of the day.  The inherent issue is the bar owners want to make as much money as possible without paying for a damn thing and anything that comes out of their pocket which isn't a remittance to their liquor distributors is an 'unfair burden on business.'
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 22, 2013, 08:25:21 PM

In what way?  What exactly are you calling a "problem"?
The issue for Fake is the horrible costs of maintaining security and medical services for that day in the community and specifically the Aggie area and the surrounding few blocks.  Also there have been several groups who are trying to shut down the celebrations because the Aggieville businesses refuse to pay their fair share for the costs of the day.  The inherent issue is the bar owners want to make as much money as possible without paying for a damn thing and anything that comes out of their pocket which isn't a remittance to their liquor distributors is an 'unfair burden on business.'

Well, there are multiple things wrong with your post, but I'll focus on the big ones.

1. Originally, Aggieville Business owners didn't pay for anything because Manhattan refused to help out, and still does to some extent, despite the fact that they make more on tickets, taxes, people coming into town for the event, etc. than any bar owner is going to make. Eventually they budged a bit and helped do clean up and the bar owners paid for porta potties and stuff (which actually probably benefited them because every bar's bathroom was out of order by noon because of vandalism.
2. The city still does a bunch of bullshit like try to shut down EVERY SINGLE BAR for over occupancy on FPD. I understand keeping everything under control, I'm not oppose to that. But they target bars and attempt to get an over occupancy to every bar in Aggieville on FPD. That's their goal. If one passes all day, they keep coming back until 2am. I wish I was kidding.
3. The city sends all of it's money to Poyntz, which isn't necessarily a lost cause, but it should play second fiddle to Aggieville. Hell, I'm surprised adding lights to the sidewalk around city park every got okay'd considering it significantly benefits people (girls) walking home from Aggieville at night. With all that money they are spending trying to connect Poyntz and the Hy-Vee area, you think at least tiny fraction of that would go to Aggieville. Manhattan City Counsel is Mr. and Mrs. Dursley, Poyntz is Dudley, and Aggieville is Harry Potter. There's no way to deny this.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ChiComCat on February 22, 2013, 08:39:27 PM
I deny your Harry Potter references
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 22, 2013, 08:40:18 PM
I deny your Harry Potter references

You can't. I already said so.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 06wildcat on February 22, 2013, 08:42:42 PM

In what way?  What exactly are you calling a "problem"?
The issue for Fake is the horrible costs of maintaining security and medical services for that day in the community and specifically the Aggie area and the surrounding few blocks.  Also there have been several groups who are trying to shut down the celebrations because the Aggieville businesses refuse to pay their fair share for the costs of the day.  The inherent issue is the bar owners want to make as much money as possible without paying for a damn thing and anything that comes out of their pocket which isn't a remittance to their liquor distributors is an 'unfair burden on business.'

Well, there are multiple things wrong with your post, but I'll focus on the big ones.

1. Originally, Aggieville Business owners didn't pay for anything because Manhattan refused to help out, and still does to some extent, despite the fact that they make more on tickets, taxes, people coming into town for the event, etc. than any bar owner is going to make. Eventually they budged a bit and helped do clean up and the bar owners paid for porta potties and stuff (which actually probably benefited them because every bar's bathroom was out of order by noon because of vandalism.
2. The city still does a bunch of bullshit like try to shut down EVERY SINGLE BAR for over occupancy on FPD. I understand keeping everything under control, I'm not oppose to that. But they target bars and attempt to get an over occupancy to every bar in Aggieville on FPD. That's their goal. If one passes all day, they keep coming back until 2am. I wish I was kidding.
3. The city sends all of it's money to Poyntz, which isn't necessarily a lost cause, but it should play second fiddle to Aggieville. Hell, I'm surprised adding lights to the sidewalk around city park every got okay'd considering it significantly benefits people (girls) walking home from Aggieville at night. With all that money they are spending trying to connect Poyntz and the Hy-Vee area, you think at least tiny fraction of that would go to Aggieville. Manhattan City Counsel is Mr. and Mrs. Dursley, Poyntz is Dudley, and Aggieville is Harry Potter. There's no way to deny this.

Aggieville gets crap on because it's way too small. There isn't the prestige/influence from business owners in Aggieville that Poyntz carries.

If the ABA was smart (they aren't), a community improvement district would be created to fund all sorts of cool infrastructure in and around Aggieville. Addressing parking to permanently close Moro would be at the top of the list. Underground crosswalks would be on toward the top as well.

If the city commission was smart (they aren't) they'd do the same thing for Poyntz.

And the commission should really be looking at making the entire swath of the city from Aggieville/City park to the redevelopment area high-density housing/mixed use zoning.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 22, 2013, 08:49:09 PM
UNDERGROUND CROSSWALKS?!?!   TELL ME MORE!
Title: Re: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 22, 2013, 08:49:15 PM

In what way?  What exactly are you calling a "problem"?
The issue for Fake is the horrible costs of maintaining security and medical services for that day in the community and specifically the Aggie area and the surrounding few blocks.  Also there have been several groups who are trying to shut down the celebrations because the Aggieville businesses refuse to pay their fair share for the costs of the day.  The inherent issue is the bar owners want to make as much money as possible without paying for a damn thing and anything that comes out of their pocket which isn't a remittance to their liquor distributors is an 'unfair burden on business.'

The city gets 1% of everything and Riley/Pott County gets another 1%. Seems like people who require medical services (or their insurance companies) pay for that, and 90% of police action is spent collecting thousands of dollars checking IDs at house parties or writing up DUIs. The idea that FPD is anything but a net benefit for the City of Manhattan, financially or otherwise, is an absolute farce.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 22, 2013, 08:55:59 PM
It really is amazing how much the community leaders hate aggieville.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 06wildcat on February 22, 2013, 08:58:50 PM
UNDERGROUND CROSSWALKS?!?!   TELL ME MORE!

Essentially tunnels under the streets so you don't have pedestrians waiting/walking through crosswalks. A couple along Bluemont/Anderson and one on 11th street would probably be enough. Would be similar to what was installed under the on ramp for 77 to link the Discover Center/hotels with the Depot.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 22, 2013, 09:18:55 PM
From the City, in response to my email...


When the Aggieville streetscape was upgraded several years ago there was decision made not to add streetscape items as you mentioned because of the abuse they might take from overzealous partiers in the District.  We didn’t want to spend money on trees and street furniture that might get broken or vandalized.  Unfortunately, things can get a little crazy late at night on Moro.

The Hunam building is finished as I understand and they do not to use any other materials on the façade or sides.  The City does not have any design guidelines for the Aggieville area.  The business owners have talked about a Historic District designation and utilizing design guidelines but have yet to come to some agreement on what they want to do.  We do have limited design criteria on some of the higher density housing areas around Aggieville but nothing in the District.

This is just laugh out loud stupidity and small timyness.

I mean JFC, like the P&L, or Westport, or Pearl Street or Mass doesn't "get rowdy" on a weekend night.

It is ridiculous that the city won't fund improvements like trees and benches, but it should be on the Aggieville businesses to set their own guidelines, and if they can't agree, then there shouldn't be any.
Title: Re: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ednksu on February 22, 2013, 09:20:44 PM
Some really odd information going on in this thread.

If we're going to go 100% FPD now I'm okay with that.

We need to realize that police and medical services used on FPD are greatly benefiting only one area of town.  Its absurd to make the entire town pay for services when they are used by only a few.  Bars are making hundreds of thousands of dollars on that one day.  The city isn't making money of FPD because of the massive increase of police and material needs to secure and service those in that area.  The city is footing the bill, not the ABA.  While I don't know specifically about the porta potties, I know the city is paying for the police, fire, and personnel to run the event.  The amount of crime and damage makes it a net loss for the general community.

There is a reason why many groups want to shut down FPD like they did at Penn St and many other universities across the nation.  Its too expensive, especially when no one wants to pay for it.  Too many people are coming into Manhattan just to cause chaos, not to enjoy a fun time, because the city has let the situation get out of reasonable control. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 22, 2013, 09:42:29 PM
Honest question, have you been attending fake patties days? The legitimate issues associated are alcohol poisoning, Aggieville bathroom vandalism, people driving under the influence, and mildly inconvenienced neighbors (front yard orgies). I'm not sure where you get the idea that people are coming here to cause chaos rather than have a good time and drink. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 22, 2013, 09:44:48 PM
bunch of rascals just causing trouble.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wetwillie on February 22, 2013, 09:52:35 PM
If FPD was truly a net loss for the city they would find a way to stop it
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ednksu on February 22, 2013, 10:04:05 PM
Honest question, have you been attending fake patties days? The legitimate issues associated are alcohol poisoning, Aggieville bathroom vandalism, people driving under the influence, and mildly inconvenienced neighbors (front yard orgies). I'm not sure where you get the idea that people are coming here to cause chaos rather than have a good time and drink.
I worked in Justin Hall one semester as a student worker, one of the people in my office was running one of the safe drinking organizations which had input with the city on FPD.  I honestly don't remember which org off the top of my head.  They had an entire power point presentation on the problems with FPD they were presenting to the city a few years ago.  One of the trends they've been having is an increase of people coming from out of the area to party, specifically KC and other college towns.  The problem is that even with the massive number of police (pulling overtime which is a HUGE cost), army liaisons, and other types of staff (ems/MFD), they are still struggling to keep ahead of the problems. 

If FPD was truly a net loss for the city they would find a way to stop it

Which is why there was/is a serious push to settle things down.  I don't remember the figures, I'm sorry its shitty posting of me (surprise!), but the city doesn't make very much because of the huge manpower issues FPD gives the city.
Title: Re: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 06wildcat on February 22, 2013, 10:27:18 PM
Some really odd information going on in this thread.

If we're going to go 100% FPD now I'm okay with that.

We need to realize that police and medical services used on FPD are greatly benefiting only one area of town.  Its absurd to make the entire town pay for services when they are used by only a few.  Bars are making hundreds of thousands of dollars on that one day.  The city isn't making money of FPD because of the massive increase of police and material needs to secure and service those in that area.  The city is footing the bill, not the ABA.  While I don't know specifically about the porta potties, I know the city is paying for the police, fire, and personnel to run the event.  The amount of crime and damage makes it a net loss for the general community.

There is a reason why many groups want to shut down FPD like they did at Penn St and many other universities across the nation.  Its too expensive, especially when no one wants to pay for it.  Too many people are coming into Manhattan just to cause chaos, not to enjoy a fun time, because the city has let the situation get out of reasonable control.

All the "problems" associated with FPD are greatly exaggerated. How many people show up to it? 7,000-10,000? That's being pretty generous too. Yes, drunken behavior is more prevalent during daylight hours on that day, but the idea that a massive presence from police/EMS etc. is perpetrated by those groups who really, really like to find reasons for overtime.

And those workers love FPD because it's so compact that all the "problems" are easy to spot and they're great targets because they are most likely just going to pay whatever fine/bill they receive without creating a fuss. There's two or three times as many "lawbreakers" at any home football game as there are during all of FPD. The only difference is there would be a huge political cost if the police chief instructed officers to go around busting shirt tucks in the west parking lot for consuming alcohol on state property. That simply doesn't exist at FPD.

Even if FPD is a net loss for the community (it's not, by a long shot), that's 1 rough ridin' day that students might cost the city a negligible amount of money. Compare that to the other 364 days where students are continually mumped over by the city despite being responsible for more than half the city's population. And I say this as a resident of Manhattan. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: eastcat on February 23, 2013, 02:08:42 PM
The people who run Manhattan are the very same people who are going to keep it held back to 'second rate' status from Lawrence, Columbia and Lincoln.

The biggest trouble makers/crap starters are from Ft. Riley, but everyone is too PC to admit it "because they are serving the country"  :dubious:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ChiComCat on February 23, 2013, 02:13:56 PM
Middle aged men drinking in lawn chairs in a parking lot do not cause the same amount of issues as FPD.  To say that they do is to be unable to have a reasonable discussion on the matter.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sys on February 23, 2013, 03:26:20 PM
i think concrete block construction can look very attractive.  much nicer than a lot of stick frame crap.
Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 23, 2013, 03:37:21 PM
i think concrete block construction can look very attractive.  much nicer than a lot of stick frame crap.

Confirmed. We should be thankful they didn't just throw up another bushwhacker's.

Or Hunan xpress.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wetwillie on February 23, 2013, 04:06:48 PM
The people who run Manhattan are the very same people who are going to keep it held back to 'second rate' status from Lawrence, Columbia and Lincoln.

The biggest trouble makers/crap starters are from Ft. Riley, but everyone is too PC to admit it "because they are serving the country"  :dubious:

Lol you must be new here if you think this board views Riley rats as off limits from criticism.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Shacks on February 23, 2013, 04:13:40 PM
The people who run Manhattan are the very same people who are going to keep it held back to 'second rate' status from Lawrence, Columbia and Lincoln.

The biggest trouble makers/crap starters are from Ft. Riley, but everyone is too PC to admit it "because they are serving the country"  :dubious:

Lol you must be new here if you think this board views Riley rats as off limits from criticism.

I'm pretty sure that by "everyone" he meant townies/city counsel, not goEMAW

Everyone here knows that Manhattan, and especially Aggieville, would be better if Riley rats weren't allowed
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 06wildcat on February 23, 2013, 07:05:49 PM
Middle aged men drinking in lawn chairs in a parking lot do not cause the same amount of issues as FPD.  To say that they do is to be unable to have a reasonable discussion on the matter.

No, they cause more issues. It's just that the city commission isn't horrified by the issues caused by them. And it's not just middle age men. A home football game has 2 to 3 times as many people coming in for a day of drinking in Manhattan, yet we don't hear about all the overtime cops need to patrol games or all the cases of alcohol poisoning etc. that goes on.

I'm not saying the issues at a football game and FPD are equal in severity. But a lot of the issues with FPD are there because the police are actively looking for them. Outside of the grass lots at football games, that's not true.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2013, 09:21:51 PM
Middle aged men drinking in lawn chairs in a parking lot do not cause the same amount of issues as FPD.  To say that they do is to be unable to have a reasonable discussion on the matter.

No, they cause more issues. It's just that the city commission isn't horrified by the issues caused by them. And it's not just middle age men. A home football game has 2 to 3 times as many people coming in for a day of drinking in Manhattan, yet we don't hear about all the overtime cops need to patrol games or all the cases of alcohol poisoning etc. that goes on.

I'm not saying the issues at a football game and FPD are equal in severity. But a lot of the issues with FPD are there because the police are actively looking for them. Outside of the grass lots at football games, that's not true.
First, your last point is totally wrong.  I've had people at my tailgate carded.  I've watched the cops wait around for minutes watching for a youthful looking offender through the cracks of tent flaps like a creeper to bust people.

Next I would be willing to be, no proof, that K-State is paying for extra police in some fashion, especially since they are doing so much joint work with Pot county.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 06wildcat on February 23, 2013, 11:58:38 PM
Middle aged men drinking in lawn chairs in a parking lot do not cause the same amount of issues as FPD.  To say that they do is to be unable to have a reasonable discussion on the matter.

No, they cause more issues. It's just that the city commission isn't horrified by the issues caused by them. And it's not just middle age men. A home football game has 2 to 3 times as many people coming in for a day of drinking in Manhattan, yet we don't hear about all the overtime cops need to patrol games or all the cases of alcohol poisoning etc. that goes on.

I'm not saying the issues at a football game and FPD are equal in severity. But a lot of the issues with FPD are there because the police are actively looking for them. Outside of the grass lots at football games, that's not true.
First, your last point is totally wrong.  I've had people at my tailgate carded.  I've watched the cops wait around for minutes watching for a youthful looking offender through the cracks of tent flaps like a creeper to bust people.

Next I would be willing to be, no proof, that K-State is paying for extra police in some fashion, especially since they are doing so much joint work with Pot county.

 :facepalm:

I've spent the majority of the past decade tailgating in either the east or west parking lot. I'm trying to think of the last time I actually saw any sort of police presence in either one. I've seen property damage that's been unreported, several fights and general drunkenness, but oddly no real police presence. I wonder why that is.

What rough ridin' joint work with Pott. County are you talking about? Does K-State have a campus in Westmoreland that I'm unaware of? As for your bet, keep your money. K-State ships enough money to the city/county in sales taxes for tickets to cover that crap.

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: eastcat on February 24, 2013, 11:53:48 PM
Middle aged men drinking in lawn chairs in a parking lot do not cause the same amount of issues as FPD.  To say that they do is to be unable to have a reasonable discussion on the matter.

No, they cause more issues. It's just that the city commission isn't horrified by the issues caused by them. And it's not just middle age men. A home football game has 2 to 3 times as many people coming in for a day of drinking in Manhattan, yet we don't hear about all the overtime cops need to patrol games or all the cases of alcohol poisoning etc. that goes on.

I'm not saying the issues at a football game and FPD are equal in severity. But a lot of the issues with FPD are there because the police are actively looking for them. Outside of the grass lots at football games, that's not true.
First, your last point is totally wrong.  I've had people at my tailgate carded.  I've watched the cops wait around for minutes watching for a youthful looking offender through the cracks of tent flaps like a creeper to bust people.

Next I would be willing to be, no proof, that K-State is paying for extra police in some fashion, especially since they are doing so much joint work with Pot county.

 :facepalm:

I've spent the majority of the past decade tailgating in either the east or west parking lot. I'm trying to think of the last time I actually saw any sort of police presence in either one. I've seen property damage that's been unreported, several fights and general drunkenness, but oddly no real police presence. I wonder why that is.

What rough ridin' joint work with Pott. County are you talking about? Does K-State have a campus in Westmoreland that I'm unaware of? As for your bet, keep your money. K-State ships enough money to the city/county in sales taxes for tickets to cover that crap.

KSUPD hires Pott county deputies to work every home game in BBall and Fball.

FPD is complained about more than football games because RCPD is the primary for FPD and they think it's a big deal to 'cope' with the crap that happens. KSUPD is primary for the Fball games and they are used to student shenanigans/don't complain like grumpy old farts.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: DQ12 on February 25, 2013, 12:49:05 AM
Underground crosswalks?  That is just stupid as all get out.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 25, 2013, 08:58:28 AM
Next I would be willing to be, no proof, that K-State is paying for extra police in some fashion, especially since they are doing so much joint work with Pot county.

If they are, they need to stop. What a waste of money . . .
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on February 25, 2013, 10:56:45 AM
Underground crosswalks?  That is just stupid as all get out.

Yeah, scratching my head as to how these would work!  The example provided goes under an elevated highway on-ramp...

Just make central Moro and Poyntz pedestrian plazas closed to cars, and you won't have to worry about time spent waiting to cross the street.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on February 25, 2013, 10:59:59 AM
Underground crosswalks?  That is just stupid as all get out.

Yeah, scratching my head as to how these would work!  The example provided goes under an elevated highway on-ramp...

Just make central Moro and Poyntz pedestrian plazas closed to cars, and you won't have to worry about time spent waiting to cross the street.

Moro should def be a ped plaza and they should also allow open beverages in that plaza. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 25, 2013, 11:01:32 AM
Underground crosswalks?  That is just stupid as all get out.

Yeah, scratching my head as to how these would work!  The example provided goes under an elevated highway on-ramp...

Just make central Moro and Poyntz pedestrian plazas closed to cars, and you won't have to worry about time spent waiting to cross the street.

Moro should def be a ped plaza and they should also allow open beverages in that plaza.

would make FPD amazing.  just like St Pats down at westport.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on February 25, 2013, 12:00:42 PM
Underground crosswalks?  That is just stupid as all get out.

Yeah, scratching my head as to how these would work!  The example provided goes under an elevated highway on-ramp...

Just make central Moro and Poyntz pedestrian plazas closed to cars, and you won't have to worry about time spent waiting to cross the street.

No one waits to cross the street in Aggieville at the crosswalks.  Few people wait to cross the street anywhere in Aggieville.  It's Manhattan, the cars will stop.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 25, 2013, 12:08:45 PM
Aggieville has many trees, just not on Moro.  And these trees have survived, notwithstanding the drunk hooliganism that is apparently commonplace.  It's funny, I've seen a lot of drunks, be it aggieville or westport, but i've never seen any drunks tearing down trees.  it's weird.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on February 25, 2013, 12:11:26 PM
Trees and benches won't be put there by the city.  The city will eventually require that each new building/renovation over a certain size include them if the city retards ever decide to put together an area plan. 
Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on February 25, 2013, 12:12:08 PM
One man's underground crosswalk is another man's subterranean FPD orgy tunnel.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on February 25, 2013, 12:12:55 PM
One man's underground crosswalk is another man's subterranean FPD orgy tunnel.

Drunk guy would set up camp and charge toll.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 25, 2013, 01:01:19 PM
Aggieville has many trees, just not on Moro.  And these trees have survived, notwithstanding the drunk hooliganism that is apparently commonplace.  It's funny, I've seen a lot of drunks, be it aggieville or westport, but i've never seen any drunks tearing down trees.  it's weird.   

There was a guy in my physics lab group who was freaking out one day because he had thrown a huge party at his house over the weekend and a few drunk guys at his party pushed on a tree until they uprooted it and then they ran off with it. He wasn't sure how he was going to break the news to his landlord that some guys just up and stole his tree.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 25, 2013, 01:12:30 PM
Aggieville has many trees, just not on Moro.  And these trees have survived, notwithstanding the drunk hooliganism that is apparently commonplace.  It's funny, I've seen a lot of drunks, be it aggieville or westport, but i've never seen any drunks tearing down trees.  it's weird.   

There was a guy in my physics lab group who was freaking out one day because he had thrown a huge party at his house over the weekend and a few drunk guys at his party pushed on a tree until they uprooted it and then they ran off with it. He wasn't sure how he was going to break the news to his landlord that some guys just up and stole his tree.

his friends sound like tools.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 25, 2013, 01:18:39 PM
Aggieville has many trees, just not on Moro.  And these trees have survived, notwithstanding the drunk hooliganism that is apparently commonplace.  It's funny, I've seen a lot of drunks, be it aggieville or westport, but i've never seen any drunks tearing down trees.  it's weird.   

There was a guy in my physics lab group who was freaking out one day because he had thrown a huge party at his house over the weekend and a few drunk guys at his party pushed on a tree until they uprooted it and then they ran off with it. He wasn't sure how he was going to break the news to his landlord that some guys just up and stole his tree.

his friends sound like tools.   

I'm pretty sure they were just some randos that showed up to his party, but it's been long enough that I don't really remember all the details.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: steve dave on February 25, 2013, 01:19:41 PM
why does he have to explain anything? the tree is outside. idiot.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 25, 2013, 01:20:58 PM
why does he have to explain anything? the tree is outside. idiot.

That's kind of what I thought. His landlord must have been a real dick or something.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 25, 2013, 01:26:28 PM
And, frankly, the joke is on the guys who uprooted and stole the tree.  everybody knows that the best time to plant a new tree is the fall. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on February 25, 2013, 03:29:45 PM
Either that tree was a week old or it was already dead.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on March 03, 2013, 07:54:28 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg152.imageshack.us%2Fimg152%2F8419%2F20130302171020.jpg&hash=b8d0e942aabe9293951b2a96f8f7804e87bac402)

the horror!   :ohno:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: waks on March 04, 2013, 12:27:33 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg152.imageshack.us%2Fimg152%2F8419%2F20130302171020.jpg&hash=b8d0e942aabe9293951b2a96f8f7804e87bac402)

the horror!   :ohno:
Looks pretty shitty IMO. Do one of the side of the apartments.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 04, 2013, 06:39:13 AM
THE TOWN IS RUINED!
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 04, 2013, 08:57:12 AM
That looks about 1000x better than Belvis was leading me to believe.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ChiComCat on March 04, 2013, 10:23:59 AM
Look like it was made out of Legos
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on March 04, 2013, 07:43:44 PM
Looks like cynder block and vinyl siding amongst mostly brick buildings.

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on March 04, 2013, 08:41:02 PM
Looks like cynder block and vinyl siding amongst mostly brick buildings.

It's aluminum, doofus.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on March 04, 2013, 08:44:13 PM
It looks much better than wabash made it seem, but it does look remind me of a farmers' co-op office.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 04, 2013, 08:54:07 PM
:
That looks about 1000x better than Belvis was leading me to believe.

It's not bad, minus the cinderblock and vinyl siding. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on March 04, 2013, 10:14:34 PM
Gotta admit, it looks pretty good except for all the materials.


Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 04, 2013, 10:18:55 PM
It looks a whole lot better than the old Hunam Express.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: pissclams on March 05, 2013, 08:05:47 AM
the food sucks, the building sucks. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 05, 2013, 10:47:53 AM
It looks a whole lot better than the old Hunam Express.

impressive. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 10:52:27 AM
The chain-link really adds a nice detail to the cinderblock and vinyl box.  Pretty nice building on the whole.  Minimalist.  understated.   

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa279%2Fmirak%2F20130305_175452_zps5a3b6d2f.jpeg&hash=248a8a2c678ebc730d944d9f5c489cc0eb234b80)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa279%2Fmirak%2F20130305_175441_zpsed20ae9a.jpeg&hash=743327e747ed2e9aaa3ebaf64e5067da0c489f9d)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 06, 2013, 11:38:16 AM
The ugliness of this building is seriously affecting BN's personal happiness.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 11:49:26 AM
The ugliness of this building is seriously affecting BN's personal happiness.

I haven't slept or showered in days.  Stopped coming to work too.  It's been rough.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 11:51:13 AM
I really don't see how the apartment complex stands out as shittier than the rest of Aggieville.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 11:56:42 AM
I really don't see how the apartment complex stands out as shittier than the rest of Aggieville.

don't you? 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 06, 2013, 12:34:16 PM
woof! I feel like in my projects my coo coo cal should be playing in the background while I look at that place
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 06, 2013, 12:35:53 PM
or like a game of tetris is going on
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: pissclams on March 06, 2013, 12:38:45 PM
that fence confuses me.  why would they build that? 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 12:44:52 PM
that fence confuses me.  why would they build that?

I really don't see what's so confusing about it?  People build chainlink fences all the time.  This one happens to encase a residential fire escape. 

amirite, NK?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: pissclams on March 06, 2013, 12:51:50 PM
as bad as those apartments look now, just imagine how great they will look in 10 years.  20 years. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on March 06, 2013, 12:53:53 PM
That last picture looks like something out of TWD. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 01:10:53 PM
as bad as those apartments look now, just imagine how great they will look in 10 years.  20 years.

Yeah. I really don't understand why anybody would be upset about this in the slightest.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GoodForAnother on March 06, 2013, 01:11:17 PM
as bad as those apartments look now, just imagine how great they will look in 10 years.  20 years.

people will love those chain link fences when the Obama apocalypse comes
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 01:56:35 PM
If you don't care about architecture or urban planning, then no,  I dont imagine it would be very upsetting.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: CNS on March 06, 2013, 01:59:39 PM
The chainlink really puts the ugh over the top.  I mean, railing is cheap and meets code.  what are they trying to do by making it look like some zoo exhibit enclosure?

Bob Strawn should be worrying about things like this rather than an increase of trash in someone's front yard one day a year.  Chain link isn't forever, but it's close.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Ghost of Stan Parrish on March 06, 2013, 02:45:37 PM
The chainlink really puts the ugh over the top.  I mean, railing is cheap and meets code.  what are they trying to do by making it look like some zoo exhibit enclosure?

Bob Strawn should be worrying about things like this rather than an increase of trash in someone's front yard one day a year.  Chain link isn't forever, but it's close.

The look strikes me as more minimum-security holding block...

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco-eagle.com%2Fstorage%2FBarriers%2FWire%2520Barriers%2520and%2520Partions%2Fprison1.jpg&hash=b56a62e9c8dcd43a492093b8082649f13e2c1900)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2013, 02:48:07 PM
what's weird is part of the "fence" looks like railing you see on modern buildings all the time. And then it just goes to chain-link.

But I think that wall facing the parking lot is far worse. :sdeek:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 02:50:49 PM
If I lived in that apartment I would host cage matches weekly and collect a sweet vig from all of the gamblers participating in the nightly Aggieville orgy. FPD would just be huge.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on March 06, 2013, 02:52:10 PM
But I think that wall facing the parking lot is far worse. :sdeek:

Huge urban pop art grafitti mural opportunity.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 02:57:23 PM
If you don't care about architecture or urban planning, then no,  I dont imagine it would be very upsetting.

I care about architecture, but not urban planning, at least not in some small town bar district. I think it's more hilarious than upsetting.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 02:58:39 PM
what's weird is part of the "fence" looks like railing you see on modern buildings all the time. And then it just goes to chain-link.

But I think that wall facing the parking lot is far worse. :sdeek:

Yeah, the choice to go windowless furthers my suspicion that this actually is a minimum security detention facility.  We can likely expect some barbed wire later this spring.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 06, 2013, 03:03:03 PM
You can't get much more urban than the wall facing the parking lot.  Or is too urbany the main problem here?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 03:10:51 PM

I care about architecture, but not urban planning, at least not in some small town bar district. I think it's more hilarious than upsetting.


We just have different expectations.  I want Manhattan to be a cool, unique, destination college town and I realize that a lot of that image is tied to Aggieville.  It's our thing.  ya know?  when people think of Manhattan and K-State, they often think of Aggieville.  I think it could be a pretty special district, especially with its proximity to campus.  It's unique.  Done properly, it could be pretty amazing.     

You view it as "some small town bar district." 

It is what it is. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 06, 2013, 03:18:04 PM
Manhattan would easily be one of the coolest college towns in the entire country if that damn Hunam building wasn't so hideous.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 03:21:54 PM
Manhattan would easily be one of the coolest college towns in the entire country if that damn Hunam building wasn't so hideous.

Again, for comprehension, Aggieville is an important community asset.  Our City planners should treat it as such. 

Or not.  see Junction City. 
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 06, 2013, 03:23:09 PM
This thread is the Lubbock clothing store owner recommendations for Kliff Kingsbury's image of architechture.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 03:30:30 PM
This thread is the Lubbock clothing store owner recommendations for Kliff Kingsbury's image of architechture.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on March 06, 2013, 03:39:22 PM
what's weird is part of the "fence" looks like railing you see on modern buildings all the time. And then it just goes to chain-link.

But I think that wall facing the parking lot is far worse. :sdeek:

Yeah, the choice to go windowless furthers my suspicion that this actually is a minimum security detention facility.  We can likely expect some barbed wire later this spring.   

maybe there are plans to fill out the parking lot, so having windows doesn't really make sense when another building would just be going there.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2013, 03:43:19 PM
This thread is the Lubbock clothing store owner recommendations for Kliff Kingsbury's image of architechture.

this was a good post
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 03:49:53 PM

I care about architecture, but not urban planning, at least not in some small town bar district. I think it's more hilarious than upsetting.


We just have different expectations.  I want Manhattan to be a cool, unique, destination college town and I realize that a lot of that image is tied to Aggieville.  It's our thing.  ya know?  when people think of Manhattan and K-State, they often think of Aggieville.  I think it could be a pretty special district, especially with its proximity to campus.  It's unique.  Done properly, it could be pretty amazing.     

You view it as "some small town bar district." 

It is what it is.

Aggieville is what it is because local owners made it as they saw fit without the city telling them what to do. Sure, the Hunam could look a whole lot better, but I think it's just fine, and 99% of everyone who comes to visit won't even think twice about how it looks.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 03:57:47 PM

Sure, the Hunam could look a whole lot better, but I think it's just fine, and 99% of everyone who comes to visit won't even think twice about how it looks.


I think you should just own the fact that you don't care how the building looks.  It's a much better position than the "it's just fine." 

I mean, we all agree that the building looks like a prison camp, yourself included.  I care about this.  You don't.  it is what it is. 

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: michigancat on March 06, 2013, 03:59:06 PM
I disagree, I think it looks like a farmers' co-op in Hoisington, from the front.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 06, 2013, 04:00:43 PM
I disagree, I think it looks like a farmers' co-op in Hoisington, from the front.

It does look kind of like a prison camp from the back, though. Still, if they can find tenants, who really cares? I certainly don't.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: puniraptor on March 06, 2013, 04:04:00 PM
I actually like the hunam facade. not the apartment building or megawall though.

It looks like they bought a whole chinese restaurant out of an ikea catalog and dropped it off on the side of the street.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Kat Kid on March 06, 2013, 05:06:14 PM
A couple thoughts I will share:

1)  the only cool thing about the building is the fire escape with chain link fence.  If Hunam's housed their workers there and there was a pai gow or dice game with guys squatting around a plastic bucket everyone would love it.  Let's keep the infrastructure and work on the culture here.

2)  the wall is a wall.

3)  the vinyl does suggest some sort of horrific Beijing suburb, but again see 1).

4)  The front looks like 2am "nachos."  If it had some sort of red brick facade and bleah-de-bleah I think we could live with it.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 06, 2013, 07:30:02 PM
Yes in #4 kk.  Windows would be nice too.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on March 07, 2013, 10:12:25 AM

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi13.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa279%2Fmirak%2F20130305_175441_zpsed20ae9a.jpeg&hash=743327e747ed2e9aaa3ebaf64e5067da0c489f9d)

We should do some sort of championship themed artwork on the windowless mega wall.  Kings of the Mountain or something with Willie holding a bunch of trophies sitting on a mountain or something.  That or a large beer or liquor advertisement.




Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: pissclams on March 07, 2013, 10:22:47 AM
windows are expensive
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 07, 2013, 10:35:19 AM
I'm pretty sure that wall was built to hide the ugly apartments behind it. A window would just defeat the purpose.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 07, 2013, 10:39:50 AM
guess what you guys, freedom isn't free. deal with it dorks.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 07, 2013, 10:49:54 AM
Mr. Ping, TEAR DOWN THAT WALL!
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on March 07, 2013, 10:52:18 AM
Belvis Noland: fascist dictator in charge of Aggieville facade construction.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on March 07, 2013, 10:58:29 AM
Fun fact, Belvis is a well known brick lover.  His whole house in Old Leawood is covered with bricks.  That's just the way he rolls.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on March 07, 2013, 11:04:00 AM
Fun fact, Belvis is a well known brick lover.  His whole house in Old Leawood is covered with bricks.  That's just the way he rolls.

If anybody knows of a good salvaged brick sale, PM me.   :thumbs:  I can't get my hands on enough of the stuff.   

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: EuroCat on March 07, 2013, 12:27:04 PM
I'll be in Manhattan for the first time in about 3 years (sans one quick game in and out) on April 6th/7th. I feel like my mind is going to be blown, plz confirm.
Title: Re: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on March 07, 2013, 12:35:59 PM
I'll be in Manhattan for the first time in about 3 years (sans one quick game in and out) on April 6th/7th. I feel like my mind is going to be blown, plz confirm.

Yeah.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 07, 2013, 12:46:02 PM
If you go to Aggieville and have eyes, take a barf bag.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on March 07, 2013, 12:53:55 PM
I'll be in Manhattan for the first time in about 3 years (sans one quick game in and out) on April 6th/7th. I feel like my mind is going to be blown, plz confirm.

If you like Beijing style tenements consider yourself in for a real treat.

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 07, 2013, 01:06:39 PM
this is not china. this is not russia. this is the united states of america and if a little bit of cinder blocks and chain link fencing is the price that i have to pay for freedom then so be it. good bless the usa.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 07, 2013, 01:10:04 PM
this is not china. this is not russia. this is the united states of america and if a little bit of cinder blocks and chain link fencing is the price that i have to pay for freedom then so be it. good bless the usa.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.vidimg02.popscreen.com%2Foriginal%2F34%2FQXBvN0IzUzhFczgx_o_lee-greenwood---god-bless-the-usa-with-lyrics.jpg&hash=e4edfd0a61035cb6c8c9260cfabc5a5172f426cc)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GoodForAnother on March 08, 2013, 09:29:11 AM
it looks a shitload better than the building it replaced
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on March 08, 2013, 11:26:28 AM
it looks a shitload better than the building it replaced

Yes it does.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on April 22, 2014, 07:12:25 PM
Are they making manhattan ave in front of whiskey dicks 2 way traffic and removing the parking?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on April 22, 2014, 07:28:12 PM
Nevermind it's just a bike lane
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: scottwildcat on April 22, 2014, 07:37:22 PM
:facepalm:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on April 22, 2014, 07:40:11 PM
:facepalm:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

eff you scott, yesterday it looked like they were removing the parking.  just drove by and they had finished today and just moved parking back 3 ft and added a curb
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on July 03, 2015, 10:23:17 AM
Aggieville visions by stud K-State APdesign students.

Important take away: More trees.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 03, 2015, 11:08:08 AM
Aggieville visions by stud K-State APdesign students.

Important take away: More trees.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)

Old townies start complaining in 3 . . . 2  . . . 1 . . .
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 03, 2015, 11:27:48 AM
Aggieville visions by stud K-State APdesign students.

Important take away: More trees.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)


i don't think any townie would complain about any of that. the fire dept might have some opinions though.
Old townies start complaining in 3 . . . 2  . . . 1 . . .
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: TownieCat on July 03, 2015, 11:31:42 AM
I would be all for straightening Laramie. Indifferent about the rest.

The comparisons to Boulder, Lawrence, and Columbia are dumb. What's so bad about having multiple retail/restaurant districts?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Belvis Noland on July 03, 2015, 11:43:46 AM
seems really nice.  I mean, if you're into that sort of thing.  trees and landscaping and such
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Trim on July 03, 2015, 12:10:19 PM
I missed this thread's original run when I was "away."  Pretty intense.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on July 03, 2015, 01:44:50 PM
 :Chirp:
Aggieville visions by stud K-State APdesign students.

Important take away: More trees.

http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/18681/VisionsVille_Vol2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)

Old townies start complaining in 3 . . . 2  . . . 1 . . .

I think it's safe to say former Manhattan Mayor Bob Strawn (tmcats/Averitas) is not a fan.

The only thing that townie hated more than Aggieville was public transit.

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on July 03, 2015, 02:09:46 PM
Love all of it, especially the Laramie stuff
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 03, 2015, 02:27:02 PM
These plans would push the 'Ville well into the rarified air of elite college bar/restaurant/shopping districts
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on July 03, 2015, 02:28:44 PM
These plans would push the 'Ville well into the rarified air of elite college bar/restaurant/shopping districts

 :cheers:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Kat Kid on July 03, 2015, 02:54:15 PM
These plans would push the 'Ville well into the rarified air of elite college bar/restaurant/shopping districts

Agree.

Also, there is no way that happens.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sys on July 03, 2015, 03:17:43 PM
just copy other successful cities.  there's no way some hick architect/planner guys in manhattan, ks are going to come up with better stuff than is already out there.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on July 03, 2015, 03:23:33 PM
I think that's what this guy did sys
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: wabash909 on July 03, 2015, 03:28:17 PM
I liked the way the archidorks duely noted how trashy Bluemont is basically from 11th to Manhattan Avenue with the gas station, Rickel's, Arby's, car wash, surface parking fronting the street and defining the first impression to the district. 

At some point when they can densify that edge condition with some multilevel mixed use, retail, living we'll really be cooking with gas.


Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sys on July 03, 2015, 04:10:11 PM
I think that's what this guy did sys

oh, that's good.  i didn't open the document.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 03, 2015, 04:11:50 PM
Looks likes too much progress to me, I don't like it.   
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: 8manpick on July 03, 2015, 04:13:24 PM
rough ridin' cinder blocks
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on July 03, 2015, 04:38:24 PM
rough ridin' cinder blocks

 :lol:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Trogdor on July 05, 2015, 10:53:49 PM
125 years? Im going to be dead by then
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 05, 2015, 10:58:59 PM
it's always super cute to see people that don't live in mhk and haven't for ten years comment on it in some way. puppy cuddling w/ kitten.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Trogdor on July 05, 2015, 11:08:20 PM
I really liked this whole plan until I saw that they are proposing to sack chipotle. This plan totally sucks
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on February 05, 2017, 01:24:08 PM
So is the car wash in aggieville getting torn down for something?  I went to get some quarters and all the machines were torn out and there just giants holes where they used to be
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on February 05, 2017, 01:28:24 PM
also that asian market right behind it has been closed for a least a few months now too
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Tobias on March 02, 2017, 07:33:55 AM
https://twitter.com/ajdomer/status/837283745220739072
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Tobias on March 02, 2017, 07:37:13 AM
https://twitter.com/wibweric/status/837282379978829825
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2017, 07:51:55 AM
Owner is from Meade, KS  :frown:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: mhkpasa on March 02, 2017, 08:12:45 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: mhkpasa on March 02, 2017, 08:16:39 AM
https://twitter.com/JaredTKSNT/status/837300791908134914

https://twitter.com/JaredTKSNT/status/837276651083993088
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: GregKSU1027 on March 02, 2017, 08:16:48 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed. They hadn't taken any of the books out so I'm sure that fire isnt going to go out for a while.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: mhkpasa on March 02, 2017, 08:19:31 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed. They hadn't taken any of the books out so I'm sure that fire isnt going to go out for a while.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Yea upon further research it had been closed for major renovations
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Trim on March 02, 2017, 08:23:55 AM
"Got a few hours to spare here in the middle of the night before my flight to knoxville, you people thought "burn it down" was funny...?"
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: chum1 on March 02, 2017, 08:47:10 AM
Aggieville must be one of the most fire prone areas in the country.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 02, 2017, 08:54:39 AM
Aggieville must be one of the most fire arson prone areas in the country.
fyp

on the bright side hopefully we wont have a dumbass bookstore in one of the best locations in aggieville anymore
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: mocat on March 02, 2017, 08:58:44 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed.

sounds like the new owner wanted a free reno courtesy of jake from state farm
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 02, 2017, 08:59:18 AM
Aggieville must be one of the most fire arson prone areas in the country.
fyp

on the bright side hopefully we wont have a dumbass bookstore in one of the best locations in aggieville anymore

townie fast fact- dusty bookshelf used to located between maes and the alley.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: TownieCat on March 02, 2017, 09:00:40 AM
Aggieville must be one of the most fire arson prone areas in the country.
fyp

on the bright side hopefully we wont have a dumbass bookstore in one of the best locations in aggieville anymore

townie fast fact- dusty bookshelf used to located between maes and the alley.

Sounds like a great topic for a podcast  :Chirp:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 02, 2017, 09:01:27 AM
Aggieville must be one of the most fire arson prone areas in the country.
fyp

on the bright side hopefully we wont have a dumbass bookstore in one of the best locations in aggieville anymore

townie fast fact- dusty bookshelf used to located between maes and the alley.
perfect location for a bookstore. hey bookstore.. amazon and the public library called and said move your ass on down the road
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 09:19:59 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed. They hadn't taken any of the books out so I'm sure that fire isnt going to go out for a while.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Yea upon further research it had been closed for major renovations
What better way to fund it! I kid. Don't they own Thread and Acme as well?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2017, 10:03:07 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed. They hadn't taken any of the books out so I'm sure that fire isnt going to go out for a while.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Yea upon further research it had been closed for major renovations
What better way to fund it! I kid. Don't they own Thread and Acme as well?

yep
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 10:16:39 AM
Thought I spent many a night crushing suds watching people walk by from inside Thread
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on March 02, 2017, 10:17:18 AM
Thought I spent many a night crushing suds watching people walk by from inside Thread
Thought so. I*
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ben ji on March 03, 2017, 10:21:42 AM
Who wants the super inside scoop on how the dusty book shelf went up in flames???

goEMAW exclusive coming up shortly
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Tobias on March 03, 2017, 10:23:57 AM
chinese steel beams with falsified fireproofing certification
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ben ji on March 03, 2017, 11:14:45 AM
chinese steel beams with falsified fireproofing certification

WRONG!

They were doing some remodeling and were staining some floors. Dirty rags were left in the back and POOF, you get a fire.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 03, 2017, 11:19:07 AM
so the rags magically caught on fire?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Gooch on March 03, 2017, 11:40:27 AM
so the rags magically caught on fire?
Spontaneous combustion.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: kslim on March 03, 2017, 11:41:09 AM
so the rags magically caught on fire?
yes, rags can have a spontaneous combustion depending on what solvent is on said rag
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 03, 2017, 11:48:51 AM
is there anyway we could dress weber up in a suit made outta that stuff?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: ben ji on March 03, 2017, 12:20:19 PM
so the rags magically caught on fire?
yes, rags can have a spontaneous combustion depending on what solvent is on said rag

http://www.cultureofsafety.com/safety-tips/spontaneous-combustion-of-oily-rags/
Title: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on March 21, 2017, 07:12:24 PM
I thought about going to the hearing last night but didn't. I might go to the one on April 4th. What do you guys think? I like the overall plan, my only concern is those spaces on the east side of the bluemont have been empty for how long?

I LOVE the Moro things they talk about like more outdoor seating and closing Moro on the weekends. I'm interested what the housing pricing would be for the apartments they are looking at putting in and what kind of restaurants/bars/businesses that would be below them. Would be interesting how they would deal with the traffic in and out of Aggieville from those extra lots and housing. It's a monster cluster eff after games and stuff but I guess closing Moro would help. I love MHK and Aggieville and I think improvements like this will only help KSU and MHK.

http://cityofmhk.com/2714/Aggieville-Community-Vision
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 22, 2017, 10:03:55 AM
whats this going to do to property taxes??  :cyclist:
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Trogdor on March 22, 2017, 10:19:24 AM
"what used to be the Dusty Bookshelf" as in it's now burned the eff down, or it was previously closed?
It has been boarded up for weeks. I'd say since December, I went over there to look for a used book and they were closed. They hadn't taken any of the books out so I'm sure that fire isnt going to go out for a while.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Yea upon further research it had been closed for major renovations
What better way to fund it! I kid. Don't they own Thread and Acme as well?

yep

All of which are owned by your favorite donut shop in aggieville
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Yard Dog on March 22, 2017, 01:32:14 PM
I haven't been back to Manhattan in almost a year. My next time back in the city will be for my wedding in May. . .will Aggieville be serviceable? Or will it be all boogered up?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: TownieCat on March 22, 2017, 02:45:37 PM
I haven't been back to Manhattan in almost a year. My next time back in the city will be for my wedding in May. . .will Aggieville be serviceable? Or will it be all boogered up?

Depends, will this be before or after May 13?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Yard Dog on March 22, 2017, 03:36:33 PM
One week before. We wanted our guests to experience Aggieville with the students still in town.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: TownieCat on March 22, 2017, 04:48:13 PM
One week before. We wanted our guests to experience Aggieville with the students still in town.

To each their own, but IMO Aggieville is like a million times better when the students are gone.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on March 22, 2017, 05:32:45 PM
One week before. We wanted our guests to experience Aggieville with the students still in town.

To each their own, but IMO Aggieville is like a million times better when the students are gone.

Depends for me. Like I didn't do fake pattys day but I was in Aggieville all day this past Saturday and it was a blast.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: TownieCat on March 22, 2017, 08:19:18 PM
One week before. We wanted our guests to experience Aggieville with the students still in town.

To each their own, but IMO Aggieville is like a million times better when the students are gone.

Depends for me. Like I didn't do fake pattys day but I was in Aggieville all day this past Saturday and it was a blast.
Well yeah because it's spring break.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on June 02, 2017, 09:40:04 PM
:sdeek:

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170603/2bff289abd87ee8d9084b690d8f4c42f.jpg)

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170603/9fa692a4175c22301591fb63a02ed618.jpg)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on June 02, 2017, 09:43:53 PM
Drugs?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on June 02, 2017, 11:03:29 PM
Word on the street(convenience store next door) is that they pulled up and someone got out, but apparently they didn't put it in park or something :confused:

That's what I thought the speed bump things were for idk.

Anyways Kurtz posted a pic about how LIT Aggieville was and he purchased some snuff at the other register as me when I was purchasing cranberry.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on June 02, 2017, 11:08:29 PM
Were you both loving life and living large?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on June 02, 2017, 11:37:13 PM
Were you both loving life and living large?

I was walking over from Arts in the Park after having a great time so yeah I was loving life and living large at that moment.
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SdK on June 02, 2017, 11:44:07 PM
eff yeah man!
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: The Big Train on June 11, 2017, 08:24:27 PM
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170612/f1a2ea38c2c030b6956fea6d8e11efe7.jpg)
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: SkinnyBenny on June 12, 2017, 02:35:46 AM
Aw man, now where will I not get my car washed?
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: Gooch on June 12, 2017, 02:48:16 PM
Sun directly in the foreground? That's just bad photography. SMDH
Title: Re: Construction in Aggieville
Post by: star seed 7 on June 12, 2017, 02:49:43 PM
Sun directly in the foreground? That's just bad photography. SMDH

IPhone camera