goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:01:06 PM

Title: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:01:06 PM
Stars Matter.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: _33 on October 29, 2011, 05:02:13 PM
Yep.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 05:02:31 PM
Is this news? :dunno:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:04:07 PM
No its not news. 

Plus, what a LOL offensive game plan . . . come on, they're rolling out plays that Venzy and Stoops have seen since the first day they walked out on a field with LHC Bill Snyder.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:04:19 PM
Dax is enjoying KState's struggles?  How odd.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:05:25 PM
I guess if my nourishing mother had attempted to abort me, I'd hate her too.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: BackPayne on October 29, 2011, 05:05:46 PM
Scared to death of the OSU game. :ohno:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:06:38 PM
Don't get Mad jt . . . you need to be brushing up on defending another 87th ranked recruiting class for K-State.



Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:08:08 PM
Good enough recruiting for a 7-0 start.  How many of the teams we've beat so far had better recruiting classes?  Squawk.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:09:39 PM
Never strive for better . . . that's our jt.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: chum1 on October 29, 2011, 05:11:12 PM
scared shitless playcalling for big games just like dod
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:12:53 PM
scared shitless playcalling for big games just like dod

Yep . . . hyper conservative doesn't work against team like OU who knows K-State backwards and forwards.   



Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:14:26 PM
Yeah, cause we could totally do better than LHC Bill Snyder.  If only we could hire an OC from a great program like OU.  Surely that kind of guy would really elevate our program.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 05:15:11 PM
They are proving what a f$cking dipsh%t cosh is.  We start consistently blitzing down by 20?
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:15:59 PM
Who said anything about changing coaches jt . . . I'll just sit back and let you go all tuck on us.

Albeit, we really do need a better DC.



Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: BackPayne on October 29, 2011, 05:20:36 PM
Our DC is a complete idiot.

I do feel we can still take Texas and ISU. Expectations have already been exceeded.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:21:31 PM
What is our D ranked overall?
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 05:22:07 PM
Who said anything about changing coaches jt . . . I'll just sit back and let you go all tuck on us.

Albeit, we really do need a better DC.





Dax, remember when someone posted a link to a U of Maryland board which showed their fans thanking us for hiring Cosh when OBz came back?
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on October 29, 2011, 05:22:12 PM
Who said anything about changing coaches jt . . . I'll just sit back and let you go all tuck on us.

Albeit, we really do need a better DC.






The zone will totally start working when OU gets tired of running up and down the field. Also, good pressure is forcing Landry into some iffy throws.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 05:23:35 PM
What is our D ranked overall?

After this game?  I enjoy that landry wets himself with pressure in his face, and cosh is bringing from the edge.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:23:46 PM
Well, those numbers are going to plummet over the next few weeks huh JT?

50 points and 555 points of offense so far today . . . I guess you can say, officially exposed.

Well Coached 4 and 5 stars will destroy DITR every time.



Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 05:27:18 PM
This is a goddamn embarasment.  So will next saturday.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: BackPayne on October 29, 2011, 05:28:17 PM


Well Coached 4 and 5 stars will destroy DITR every time.





No kidding?
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 05:29:20 PM
it takes a special kind of dumbass to bitch about a 7-1 team.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 05:32:42 PM
it takes a special kind of dumbass to bitch about a 7-1 team.

Yeah, we have pretty easy stretch left, I am sure we will keep pace.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:33:32 PM
Dax is the special kind of Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) who refuses to recognize the success KSU enjoys and instead chooses to relish in their struggles.  Pretty much says everything about Dax as a man.  Small wonder why Dax loves to BBS so much, you can still type with a ball in your mouth.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: OregonSmock on October 29, 2011, 05:34:42 PM
This is what happens, jt.  This is what happens when you f*ck a stranger in the ass!!!
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: slimz on October 29, 2011, 05:35:04 PM
Dax is the special kind of Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) who refuses to recognize the success KSU enjoys and instead chooses to relish in their struggles.  Pretty much says everything about Dax as a man.  Small wonder why Dax loves to BBS so much, you can still type with a ball in your mouth.

Dax is the kind of guy who would like to play for a trophy someday, instead of getting his blowout of ku, tucking in his shirt tighter, and declaring all is right with the world.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:35:35 PM
A 7-1 team that's being completely clown car'd and exposed . . . for what it is, a nice band of DITR overachievers and a program that can't get to the next level of recruiting.   One because the old fart head coach refuses to really get with the program and he's surrounded himself with guys who are mediocre coaches and not good recruiters.

jt is that special kind of guy who cherish Copper Bowls and will never demand anything more than just being kind of interesting from a coach getting paid nearly $2 million dollars a year.  



 
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 05:36:11 PM
it takes a special kind of dumbass to bitch about a 7-1 team.

Yeah, we have pretty easy stretch left, I am sure we will keep pace.

we were supposed to have 3 or 4 wins at this point.

forgive me for not chalking up automatic L's from here on out.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 05:36:20 PM
Dax is the special kind of Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) who refuses to recognize the success KSU enjoys and instead chooses to relish in their struggles.  Pretty much says everything about Dax as a man.  Small wonder why Dax loves to BBS so much, you can still type with a ball in your mouth.

Dax is the kind of guy who would like to play for a trophy someday, instead of getting his blowout of ku, tucking in his shirt tighter, and declaring all is right with the world.
No Dax is both, and JTKSU is an idiot who is too myopic to see past K-State football.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: monumentcat on October 29, 2011, 05:36:39 PM
Yay goEMAW is happy. We lost. rough ridin' miserable bastards.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:36:51 PM
Please list the actually possible things that could be done to change our program from a 7-1 to an 8-0.  Ready? Go.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on October 29, 2011, 05:38:38 PM
it takes a special kind of dumbass to bitch about a 7-1 team.

Yeah, because we've faced the murders' row of the Big 12. Excluding OU, the B12 teams we've played are a collective 5-12.

 :jerk:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 05:38:58 PM
JTKSU, admit we are getting blown the eff out and that it has almost everything to do with poor recruiting.

Dax, admit the 7-0 start was pretty good and that you really do like to second guess what K-State does (for good or bad).
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:40:11 PM
eff you, MSC.  eff you right in the ass.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:41:53 PM
Wow 639 yards of total offense today for ou . . . Snyder and Cosh just put on their 3rd clown suit.


Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 05:42:32 PM
What size is that clownsuit?  7-1.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:43:20 PM
Does K-State even have a first down this half?

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:44:27 PM
10.1 yards per play for OU so far today.

Exposed.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 05:44:44 PM
Dax is just telling it like it is - we've gotten some pretty lucky breaks this year, fumbles bouncing right back into our hands etc. There is nothing untrue about what he says. Please do the following:

1. untuck
2. open your rough ridin' eyes
3. understand that we are not a great team.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 05:46:30 PM
it takes a special kind of dumbass to bitch about a 7-1 team.

Yeah, we have pretty easy stretch left, I am sure we will keep pace.

we were supposed to have 3 or 4 wins at this point.

forgive me for not chalking up automatic L's from here on out.

forgive me for not doing catrwheels because we don't suck complete sh%t. And for not burying my head in my own ass and not recognizing our future schedule.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:50:16 PM
Today was a clear indication that well coached teams with stud players will perpetually put the clown suit on Snyder and his merry band of non recruiters.   Stoops even owned Snyder in the field position/wind battle today.  

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: monumentcat on October 29, 2011, 05:53:19 PM
Today was a clear indication that well coached teams with stud players will perpetually put the clown suit on Snyder and his merry band of non recruiters.   Stoops even owned Snyder in the field position/wind battle today.  



No crap?  You think?  Well coached talent will always beat well-coached non-talent.  Really, thanks for the insight Dax.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 05:53:52 PM
Today was a clear indication that well coached teams with stud players will perpetually put the clown suit on Snyder and his merry band of non recruiters.   Stoops even owned Snyder in the field position/wind battle today.  


I mean you're right, but this isn't news to anybody with half a brain.  A great coach with better players will beat a great coach with mediocre players almost every time.   We need better players and we will not be of national relevance until we do.  No crap.

Despite this, winning the games we have so far is pretty rough ridin' cool precisely because we shouldn't have won them.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:55:35 PM
So we have an opening on the staff and instead of going out and getting a dynamic recruiter, we hire a guy nearly as old as Snyder to try and Coach'em up.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: felix rex on October 29, 2011, 05:56:39 PM
Man, this is gonna be a good two weeks of BBSing.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 05:56:53 PM
Coach 'em up is rough ridin' dead and gone... you can spend all motherfucking day putting a polish on a turd, but when it's all said and done all you have is one shiney-ass piece of SHlT!!!
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 05:57:04 PM
So we have an opening on the staff and instead of going out and getting a dynamic recruiter, we hire a guy nearly as old as Snyder to try and Coach'em up.


Yes that was a dumb move.  
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: monumentcat on October 29, 2011, 05:58:01 PM
Today was a clear indication that well coached teams with stud players will perpetually put the clown suit on Snyder and his merry band of non recruiters.   Stoops even owned Snyder in the field position/wind battle today.  


I mean you're right, but this isn't news to anybody with half a brain.  A great coach with better players will beat a great coach with mediocre players almost every time.   We need better players and we will not be of national relevance until we do.  No crap.

Despite this, winning the games we have so far is pretty rough ridin' cool precisely because we shouldn't have won them.

This.

 Who really thought we were the no. 8 team in the nation?  If you did, you were probably a dumbass. It was a fun ride, but we are what we are a solid football team that should get a nice bowl game.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 05:59:23 PM
I sure didn't think we were the #8 team in the country . . . but we didn't even compete today in the 2nd half, Stoops and Venzy absolutely destroyed our staff talent difference or not.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 7NationalTitles on October 29, 2011, 06:01:10 PM
Good game boys... You fans sure did cry a lot in the first 1/2. Think we didn't even have our starting running back the whole game
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 06:01:58 PM
What ranking will we have at the end of the year?  Cause that's all that matters.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:03:18 PM
Today was a clear indication that well coached teams with stud players will perpetually put the clown suit on Snyder and his merry band of non recruiters.   Stoops even owned Snyder in the field position/wind battle today.  


I mean you're right, but this isn't news to anybody with half a brain.  A great coach with better players will beat a great coach with mediocre players almost every time.   We need better players and we will not be of national relevance until we do.  No crap.

Despite this, winning the games we have so far is pretty rough ridin' cool precisely because we shouldn't have won them.

This.

 Who really thought we were the no. 8 team in the nation?  If you did, you were probably a dumbass. It was a fun ride, but we are what we are a solid football team that should get a nice bowl game.

Define nice. To me nice is the Cotton or the Holiday bowl - I can see us making a repeat trip to the pin stripe bowl and that isn't nice no matter how you spin it.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: CHONGS on October 29, 2011, 06:03:36 PM
What ranking will we have at the end of the year?  Cause that's all that matters.
I think we may end up near 25 or so? depends on if we finish over .500 in conference
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: joda on October 29, 2011, 06:04:45 PM
What ranking will we have at the end of the year?  Cause that's all that matters.

We lose next week, split with A&M and Texas, win Farmageddon... end up 9-3 ranked #21
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 06:13:55 PM
I can't excuse that second half performance and no one should. We should be beyond that kind of embarrassment.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:14:10 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 06:19:05 PM
went from thinking we were in good position to steal one if we scored on the 1st poss. of 2nd half, to just wanting it to be over with 3 minutes left in the 3rd.

was pretty awful.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:21:48 PM
went from thinking we were in good position to steal one if we scored on the 1st poss. of 2nd half, to just wanting it to be over with 3 minutes left in the 3rd.

was pretty awful.

I actually thought we had a chance in the 2nd half because of what we did at Tech... I clown-suited myself.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 06:22:40 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:26:36 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.

My predicto was 8-4 or 9-3 at best. I am wasted right now.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 06:27:45 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.

yeah. beat isu. split a&m/tex and obviously get shamed by osu.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:33:28 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.

yeah. beat isu. split a&m/tex and obviously get shamed by osu.


OSU will be worse than this loss
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: felix rex on October 29, 2011, 06:37:02 PM
I can't excuse that second half performance and no one should. We should be beyond that kind of embarrassment.

Yeah. Me, too. That hurt. I was prepared to lose. It was the public shaming that hurts.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 06:40:16 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.

yeah. beat isu. split a&m/tex and obviously get shamed by osu.


OSU will be worse than this loss

Probably not. Something like 45-24 is what I expect.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Kat Kid on October 29, 2011, 06:40:38 PM
This one stung.  Hard.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 06:43:16 PM
Heck, the first half wasn't bad. It was just such a terrible 2nd half that it's hard to know what to say. A 35-0 white washing that didn't even seen that close is tough.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 06:47:16 PM
They're gonna be ruthless to us tomorrow - we lose next week and were out of the top 25, we split UT and aTm and win Farmagedden and maybe were ranked, but I doubt it. Hell, at this point - I'm not sure if we can win in November

This team will still likely win 9 games.

yeah. beat isu. split a&m/tex and obviously get shamed by osu.


OSU will be worse than this loss

Probably not. Something like 45-24 is what I expect.

We'll stagger into Boone Pickens with the same stupid game plan, save for the cute little wildcat formation every now and then, and Weeden and co. will proceed to disect us, I hope it is as respectable as 45-24 - but Gundy didn't even open his playbook last year and that loss just looked effortless.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 06:47:59 PM
What game plan do you suggest?
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 07:08:33 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: monumentcat on October 29, 2011, 07:15:30 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Dude, sometimes the other team is much, much more talented then you and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

That being said, Stoops, Venzy and Co  and put a clown suit on Snyder, Cosh and the merry band of non-recruiters in the second half.

I'm not hopeful for next weekend.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 07:23:22 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Our defensive line got absolutely dominated today and we couldn't block OU's defensive ends.

Honestly there aren't a ton of adjustments defensively we could've made and that's where the main adjustments needed to be made. Our defensive plan obviously assumed we'd see the Landry Jones that we've seen the last couple weeks; a guy who didn't consistently make throws and made plenty of mistakes. We thought we could make them drive the ball with throws and stop the run, and up until late in the 3rd quarter OU had less than 50 yards rushing, its just that we didn't stop the pass at all.  We got the two mistakes in the first half (also pretty good plays by Malone), but we tried to play zone behind, mainly cover 2, and we thought we could get pressure from our front 4 and we got absolutely NONE. The only adjustment would be play man defense and try to blitz and that is not something we are going to see. We got OU's offense playing their best football and that made it extremely tough.

That said, it was an embarrassing performance in the 2nd half and the offense was bad too, but the last 30 minutes (outside of the EKU game maybe) is the only terrible football of the year. Granted, it was really, really bad, but overall this season has still been a great success, its just that the worst is pretty fresh in our minds.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 07:26:48 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Dude, sometimes the other team is much, much more talented then you and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

That being said, Stoops, Venzy and Co  and put a clown suit on Snyder, Cosh and the merry band of non-recruiters in the second half.

I'm not hopeful for next weekend.

Yeah, I get the whole talent thing - it's just that we were with OU through the first half and because of our shitty adjustments (if there were any) we looked like a bunch is rough ridin' idiots in the ENTIRE second half.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on October 29, 2011, 07:27:13 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Dude, sometimes the other team is much, much more talented then you and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.


 :facepalm:

We're never going to be elite again with the majority of our fans having this attitude.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 07:35:55 PM
As long as Snyder is the coach, the majority of K-State will be more than pleased with over coaching DITR and going 7-5 or 8-4.   Which is nice, but it would be nice to see a coaching staff actually land some kinds that are sought by other high quality BCS level schools. 

So far, we have 2 guys committed showing legit BCS offers besides K-State.   Come on Man, this is recruiting class #4. 
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 07:38:40 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

one thing I'd suggest is that if you're not blitzing down 6 or up 3, then why are we blitzing down 20...and 30...and why on god's green f'ing earth are we blizting from the edge when landry is awful with pressure in his face?  

and offensively, we're really going to run 3 and 4 receiver sets and then run 3 goddamn routes that take longer than 3  seconds to run?  

and the play call on 3rd and 4 at the end of the 2nd quarter was beyond Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  I mean, we're f'ing destroying them up front and we pass it 15 yards to the back of the endzone?  I realize we ran the same play to harper against tech...but that was against single coverage to (I believe) the wide side of the field.  ou was in zone and it was double coverage to the short side.  

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: monumentcat on October 29, 2011, 07:39:02 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Dude, sometimes the other team is much, much more talented then you and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.


 :facepalm:

We're never going to be elite again with the majority of our fans having this attitude.

 :curse:

No I have no problem stating Oklahoma has a lot more talent than us, now.

 We will never be elite again if we think talent doesn't  matter.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: wetwillie on October 29, 2011, 07:47:30 PM
No point banging your head against the wall. He isn't going anywhere.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on October 29, 2011, 08:12:45 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

I'm not the old [redacted] whos getting 2M/yr to put a quality product on the field and to surround himself with people who aren't idiots. _FAN, I am not an x's and O's guy but for eff's sake - isn't there a plan B? isn't there an adjustment to be made? If your QB is pissing down his homeschooled leg, shouldn't you try something different?

I am just a guy who loves his team and I am unwilling to accept this RIDICULOUS performance. I'm not that guy who throws the "I told you so's" out there, but this SHlT has to stop! There was no answer for the second half and we were able to keep up with them in the first - no adjustments and THAT'S what these assholes are paid to rough ridin' do!!!

Dude, sometimes the other team is much, much more talented then you and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.


 :facepalm:

We're never going to be elite again with the majority of our fans having this attitude.

 :curse:

No I have no problem stating Oklahoma has a lot more talent than us, now.

 We will never be elite again if we think talent doesn't  matter.


No, talent does matter. Having a coach that can get talent is a pretty big part of not getting in the position of the other team being "much, much more talented than you."

You believe there's not a damn thing Snyder could do about that.

I believe it's his rough ridin' job to not let that happen.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: felix rex on October 29, 2011, 08:20:48 PM
Just think. 24 hours ago we were reduced to haikus and threads about sleezy's wife's boobs. This is just the shot in the arm that this place needed.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 08:21:46 PM



No, talent does matter. Having a coach that can get talent is a pretty big part of not getting in the position of the other team being "much, much more talented than you."

You believe there's not a damn thing Snyder could do about that.

I believe it's his rough ridin' job to not let that happen.
[/quote]

newsflash:

we are k-state

we all know the reality. we will never pull in top 10 recruiting classes.

i agree that we need better assistants, as both coaches and recruiters. but even then, we are perpetually in an uphill battle.

it's not defeatist to acknowledge that 98 was our shot. nor is it defeatist to appreciate the effort and fortitude of this year's team and staff.

i'm enjoying this team. the eff with anything else.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 08:26:43 PM
Yes, everyone will start demanding top 10 recruiting classes . . .  :facepalm:

How about Top 50 . . . why should that be so hard?

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: kso_FAN on October 29, 2011, 08:27:41 PM
What game plan do you suggest?

one thing I'd suggest is that if you're not blitzing down 6 or up 3, then why are we blitzing down 20...and 30...and why on god's green f'ing earth are we blizting from the edge when landry is awful with pressure in his face?  

and offensively, we're really going to run 3 and 4 receiver sets and then run 3 goddamn routes that take longer than 3  seconds to run?  

and the play call on 3rd and 4 at the end of the 2nd quarter was beyond Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  I mean, we're f'ing destroying them up front and we pass it 15 yards to the back of the endzone?  I realize we ran the same play to harper against tech...but that was against single coverage to (I believe) the wide side of the field.  ou was in zone and it was double coverage to the short side.  



All legitimate critiques, especially the pass to Harper inside the red zone.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: catzacker on October 29, 2011, 08:27:54 PM
Yes, everyone will start demanding top 10 recruiting classes . . .  :facepalm:

How about Top 50 . . . why should that be so hard?



if all pinochio needed was a little bit of faith and pixie dust, by god, that's all the ksu snydcats need.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: j-dub on October 29, 2011, 08:29:22 PM
Yes, everyone will start demanding top 10 recruiting classes . . .  :facepalm:

How about Top 50 . . . why should that be so hard?



you wouldn't be satisfied. you would demand top 25.

if we got top 25, you would demand top 10.

very nubb of you btw.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 08:30:56 PM
j-dub . . . new king of the tucks.

Also, keep in mind that we could of had a all new Vanier to recruit to, but Snyder couldn't be bothered with the construction.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 08:39:29 PM



No, talent does matter. Having a coach that can get talent is a pretty big part of not getting in the position of the other team being "much, much more talented than you."

You believe there's not a damn thing Snyder could do about that.

I believe it's his rough ridin' job to not let that happen.

newsflash:

we are k-state

we all know the reality. we will never pull in top 10 recruiting classes.

i agree that we need better assistants, as both coaches and recruiters. but even then, we are perpetually in an uphill battle.

it's not defeatist to acknowledge that 98 was our shot. nor is it defeatist to appreciate the effort and fortitude of this year's team and staff.

i'm enjoying this team. the eff with anything else.


[/quote]

I rough ridin' hate the "This is Manhattan and it's impossible to recruit high caliber athletes here" talking point. Morgantown is a hell-hole, they pull 4-5* guys regularily. What Floridian/Texan/Southern/Northern Californian in their right minds would go to Lincoln, NE? Who in the hell would want to go to South Bend, IN? Oh and State College, PA is a SHlTHOLE too with crappy weather and it's in Central, PA about 3 hrs from both Philly and Pittsburgh. That's the difference between good recruiting and what we have - these guys "get it" and we are still are in the stone ages w/r to landing high quality recruits. Oh and if Sams is that damned good, START HIS ASS, SHlT, AT LEAST WE'D HAVE A PASSING THREAT!!!
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 08:41:28 PM
Comparing KSU to UNL, ND, and PSU is beyond Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: theymightbegiants on October 29, 2011, 08:51:31 PM
we are 7-1... our fans pissed off stoops so he made us pay for it when we couldn't even throw a pass when we called a pass play. Next week is going to be bad too then every game is winnable. Quitters quit, winners win, the better team won today just hope we didn't quit
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 09:01:07 PM
Comparing KSU to UNL, ND, and PSU is beyond Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

Locations man, I'm comparing locations. Baylor's a 25th in recruiting and they're in Waco MF TX, Tech is in a DRY COUNTY and they are 14th, WVU is 21... if we had recruiters who were worth a eff, we'd be at least top 50 - but we have SHlTHEADS
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 09:03:38 PM
Baylor is located smack dab in the middle of Texas.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 09:06:55 PM
Baylor is located smack dab in the middle of Texas.

And Waco is a shithole too, Fresno is located smack dab in the middle of CA, and nobody in their right mind likes that place. Why? Because it's a shithole too. If a staff can recruit to a Lubbock, TX where you can't buy booze, we can recruit to Mahnhattan, KS.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Rams on October 29, 2011, 09:42:07 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 09:44:34 PM
A 7-1 team that's being completely clown car'd and exposed . . . for what it is, a nice band of DITR overachievers and a program that can't get to the next level of recruiting.   One because the old fart head coach refuses to really get with the program and he's surrounded himself with guys who are mediocre coaches and not good recruiters.

jt is that special kind of guy who cherish Copper Bowls and will never demand anything more than just being kind of interesting from a coach getting paid nearly $2 million dollars a year.  



 
Thank God we're not paying HCTG that kind of money!  :ohno:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 09:53:01 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Trim on October 29, 2011, 09:53:54 PM
You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins.

Elite combofanners can do both.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 09:55:24 PM
Good game boys... You fans sure did cry a lot in the first 1/2. Think we didn't even have our starting running back the whole game
Look you dumbfucks wanted a round robin conference play.  Guess what, lots of luck playing in a BCS bowl.  You lost to Texas Tech, who just got clown-suited by Iowa State.  And after OSU gets done with ya, you'll be going to a nice bowl just like us.  Suck on that for a while turdlicker.  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: pike on October 29, 2011, 09:57:33 PM
Sooner fans turned into Nubb fans?  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 10:00:25 PM
GTFOOMF with this, "can't do any better than Snyder" BS.

If an actual coaching search is conducted you can find a good candidate, when a school is willing to pay $2 million or more for a coach, they'll be plenty of interest in the job.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: jtksu on October 29, 2011, 10:01:40 PM
I'll retire from this board forever if our next HC is a surefire, future HOF'r.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 10:03:33 PM
I'll retire from this board forever if our next HC is a surefire, future HOF'r.

Yeah, because everyone knew in 1989 that LHC Bill Snyder was going to be a surefire HOF'er . . .  :facepalm:

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 10:07:57 PM
Just think. 24 hours ago we were reduced to haikus and threads about sleezy's wife's boobs. This is just the shot in the arm that this place needed.
Man you said a mouth full.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Rams on October 29, 2011, 10:09:50 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 10:16:47 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 10:23:01 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.

FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.
I'm confused, what do you call OU last getting torched by 27 points in the first half last week.  Now that gota be embarrassing. 

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Rams on October 29, 2011, 10:24:07 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 10:27:22 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...
Rams stop it, we're going to lose Tommy with this logic.  :fatty:
Title: OSU proving . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 10:33:27 PM
that facilities matter.

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 10:37:52 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I'll never understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Tobias on October 29, 2011, 10:39:45 PM
i really enjoyed that post tommy.  :thumbs:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 10:46:24 PM
i really enjoyed that post tommy.  :thumbs:


 :cheers:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2011, 10:47:05 PM
Tommy . . . please come out of the dugout and take a bow.

Tucks have convinced each other that every where else is some sort of exotic locale and that only K-State has geographic challenges.    

Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Rams on October 29, 2011, 10:49:06 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
No, I get it.  I understand perfectly.  You don't care how many games we win, you just want to be able to brag about a top 20 recruiting class.  

I'm completely confident that we can find a coach that could get us top 20 recruiting classes every year, so I'm not arguing that point.  If you find a good recruiter, they can recruit to just about anywhere.  They may not be able to coach worth a eff, but they can get some good recruits to come to Manhattan.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 10:52:31 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I'll never understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
While I generally agree with your logic, you talking points are lacking.  When the great Chase Coffman was recruited by Moo, we had Scary Smart Prince Mcjunkins.  :nono:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Rams on October 29, 2011, 10:53:43 PM
Tommy . . . please come out of the dugout and take a bow.

Tucks have convinced each other that every where else is some sort of exotic locale and that only K-State has geographic challenges.    



False.  A good recruiter could get good talent to come to Manhattan.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 10:59:16 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
No, I get it.  I understand perfectly.  You don't care how many games we win, you just want to be able to brag about a top 20 recruiting class.  

I'm completely confident that we can find a coach that could get us top 20 recruiting classes every year, so I'm not arguing that point.  If you find a good recruiter, they can recruit to just about anywhere.  They may not be able to coach worth a eff, but they can get some good recruits to come to Manhattan.


Climb down off the short bus and stop being so Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Who in the hell would want Bill Calafraud as thier coach (a guy who can recruit, but isn't a good coach) - If LHC Snyder had a good recruiting staff we'd probably have had a better chance at winning today. Nobody is denying that they guy knows how to coach - he's just stuck with his merry band of SHlTHEADS who (now follow along, because this is the important part) cannot recruit. NOW do you see or are we still stuck on bragging about recruiting classes?  :facepalm:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 10:59:21 PM
Tommy . . . please come out of the dugout and take a bow.

Tucks have convinced each other that every where else is some sort of exotic locale and that only K-State has geographic challenges.    



False.  A good recruiter could get good talent to come to Manhattan.
I don't think anyone is saying that we can't recruite to Manhappyness.  Look Caliahan recruited top classes every year he was at Nub, but couldn't win a fuckin game if it was handed to him.  Coaching quality is important; and it doesn't seem anyone is willing to give OB the credit he deserves.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 11:01:59 PM
sorry slow typing.  Looks like you answered before I posted.  :surprised:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 11:05:43 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I'll never understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
While I generally agree with your logic, you talking points are lacking.  When the great Chase Coffman was recruited by Moo, we had Scary Smart Prince Mcjunkins.  :nono:

Chase Coffman Class of 2005

Scary Smart started coaching at the Kansas State University 2006 - try to keep up.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Katpappy on October 29, 2011, 11:11:33 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I'll never understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
While I generally agree with your logic, you talking points are lacking.  When the great Chase Coffman was recruited by Moo, we had Scary Smart Prince Mcjunkins.  :nono:

Chase Coffman Class of 2005

Scary Smart started coaching at the Kansas State University 2006 - try to keep up.
OB retired in '05, it was up to Scary Smart at that point.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on October 29, 2011, 11:16:33 PM
I swear to god that the majority of K-State fans have battered wives' syndrome when it comes to Snyder. He's the answer to everything because no one could possibly ever love us if we left him.

Yes, he saved us from becoming FHSU east. Sure he can probably continue winning 6-8 games a year until he dies but he's also going to put teams out there every year that will get taken to the woodshed in one or two games.

Snyder didn't build K-State into a national power by himself you dumb fucks. He had the help of some other equally incredibly gifted coaches. Coaches that went on to coach in national championship games and BCS bowls.

Who on his current staff is going to be hired away? crap, Snyder has become so inept a recruiting, he can't even find anyone not getting AARP mailers to coach with him.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 11:18:44 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that's better than Snyder and  that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins mediocraty.


FYP, tuck.

First of all, if you're going to fix my posts, at least learn to spell.  Secondly, I love how you rattled off TT, Baylor and WV's recruiting classes with envy.  I know you haven't been paying attention, but we already beat 2 of those teams and the other one got prison raped by SYRACUSE a couple of weeks ago.

And your idea of mediocrity is almost as Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as your spelling of it.


Your P.I. =  :zzz:

You have missed my point tuck. Follow along - the point is those places are about as attractive to recruit to as Manhattan, KS (and some places are even MORE isloated than Manhattan is). IDGAF who beats who, as that is completely irrelevant in regards to this particular conversation. If we had a staff that could recruit, we'd have a decent to pretty good recruiting class and maybe we dont get TORCHED like we did today. I dont know why that is so hard to understand.

Oh I get it.  You mean like TT's pretty decent recruiting class kept them from getting TORCHED by ISU today.

wait...

 :facepalm: OK, for the last time - if you were a 4* athlete, would you look at Lubbock, TX if a old guy talked to you about family and Pinnochio and bettering yourself all the while you knew you couldn't go down to the local Valero and pick up a 30 pack of beer? Hell no you wouldn't, but if they had an elite coaching staff and an amazing recruiter who wined and dined you and stroked your ego, you'd sign in a minute. Wheter or not they won, lost, butt-mumped each other at half-time is irrelevant for this convo. I'm just trying to talk to the ridiculous tuck talking point that we cant do any better becasue were located in Manhattan, KS. Lastly, remember Chase Coffman? The good Coffman FB player? His dad, Paul Coffman played at KSU and you'd figure the guy was a shoe-in, right? When OBz went to work his magic and lay our his  Pinnochio BS, Chase Coffman (reportedly) fell asleep! THAT'S shitty recruiting and THAT'S why we can't get good recruits here. Do you get it yet? I'll never understand the blind allegiance that KSUTUCKNATION has to OBz.
While I generally agree with your logic, you talking points are lacking.  When the great Chase Coffman was recruited by Moo, we had Scary Smart Prince Mcjunkins.  :nono:

Chase Coffman Class of 2005

Scary Smart started coaching at the Kansas State University 2006 - try to keep up.
OB retired in '05, it was up to Scary Smart at that point.

If you are in the class of 2005, then you are recruited in (drum roll please) 2004. We all know how ridiculous we did in 2004, right?  :cheers:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 29, 2011, 11:19:29 PM
I swear to god that the majority of K-State fans have battered wives' syndrome when it comes to Snyder. He's the answer to everything because no one could possibly ever love us if we left him.

Yes, he saved us from becoming FHSU east. Sure he can probably continue winning 6-8 games a year until he dies but he's also going to put teams out there every year that will get taken to the woodshed in one or two games.

Snyder didn't build K-State into a national power by himself you dumb fucks. He had the help of some other equally incredibly gifted coaches. Coaches that went on to coach in national championship games and BCS bowls.

Who on his current staff is going to be hired away? crap, Snyder has become so inept a recruiting, he can't even find anyone not getting AARP mailers to coach with him.


 :cheers:
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: Fuktard on October 29, 2011, 11:59:30 PM
lol at you rough ridin' retards.  You try so hard to be anti-tuck that you end up being exactly like them, only on the opposite end of the spectrum.  We lose our first game of the season and you all can't wait to join in the circle jerk and piss all over this team and coaching staff like we're 0-8.  OU got embarrassed at home last week by a TT team that we beat in Lubbock...who just got their asses handed to them by a bad ISU team...at home.  It's Big XII college football.  crap happens.

Any of you that think K-State can just go out and land a coach that can get perennial top 15 recruiting classes AND keep a team in the top 10 every year is rough ridin' delusional.  You keep crying about our recruiting classes and I'll keep enjoying our wins.


I couldn't have said this better myself.  excellent post.
Title: Re: OU proving that . . .
Post by: 7NationalTitles on October 30, 2011, 12:03:09 AM
Just think. 24 hours ago we were reduced to haikus and threads about sleezy's wife's boobs. This is just the shot in the arm that this place needed.

And the LHC Bill Snyder lemon party threads