goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 07:35:18 PM

Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 07:35:18 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: EMAWmeister on November 14, 2012, 07:38:51 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.20jazzfunkgreats.co.uk%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F08%2Fweird.gif&hash=c765714f698a1ff6698d862df0a855a276d49b82)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: EllToPay on November 14, 2012, 07:39:11 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.

jfc, i was getting worried.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on November 14, 2012, 07:41:43 PM
 :zzz:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 07:43:20 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Perry on November 14, 2012, 07:46:57 PM
Seems like they turn the ball over a fair amount, even with 1y out I think the defense is probably good for a couple against the Bears. Not really concerned about the offense, biggest source of nervousness for me is more players getting hurt.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 07:48:52 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.

yeah, but their offense is better than any other offense we've faced this season.  Total offense is better than Oregon.  OREGON.  Plus, the team is just tired.  Lot of energy has been expended over the past month....@ISU, @ WVU, TT, OSU, @ TCU.  Emawtionally, they look spent. Hell, I'm spent and I'm just watching. 
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 07:48:58 PM
500+ yards per game in Bennettville.

BU has allowed Big 12 opponents to score 14 points more than their per game scoring ave in their 6 games. K-State has scored 15 points per game more than their Big 12 opponents give up on a per game basis.

We got this.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 0.42 on November 14, 2012, 07:50:02 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.

yeah, but their offense is better than any other offense we've faced this season.  Total offense is better than Oregon.  OREGON.  Plus, the team is just tired.  Lot of energy has been expended over the past month....@ISU, @ WVU, TT, OSU, @ TCU.  Emawtionally, they look spent. Hell, I'm spent and I'm just watching.

TCU and OK State have defenses with a pulse, especially TCU. Baylor doesn't. We won't punt until the 4th quarter on Saturday, if at all.

We're fine.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 3maw on November 14, 2012, 07:55:19 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifsforum.com%2Fimages%2Fgif%2Fdid%2520not%2520read%2Fgrand%2Fdid-not-read-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-2346.gif&hash=3ed1560228cec1ed6c0ac7c2d833051569d24ba0)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: p1k3 on November 14, 2012, 07:56:42 PM
Nick Florence had 15 carries for 83 yards. Averaged 5.5 ypc. They have used him like this only a couple times in conference (vs UT - 69 yards and 6.3ypc). Baylor probably just caught Mack and Stoops off guard. No way does he do that again vs the Khatzs
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2012, 07:59:43 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.

yeah, but their offense is better than any other offense we've faced this season.  Total offense is better than Oregon.  OREGON.  Plus, the team is just tired.  Lot of energy has been expended over the past month....@ISU, @ WVU, TT, OSU, @ TCU.  Emawtionally, they look spent. Hell, I'm spent and I'm just watching. 

How much of their offense is skewed by the west Virginia game?  They had at least two games of offense against wvu
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:00:04 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.

yeah, but their offense is better than any other offense we've faced this season.  Total offense is better than Oregon.  OREGON.  Plus, the team is just tired.  Lot of energy has been expended over the past month....@ISU, @ WVU, TT, OSU, @ TCU.  Emawtionally, they look spent. Hell, I'm spent and I'm just watching.

TCU and OK State have defenses with a pulse, especially TCU. Baylor doesn't. We won't punt until the 4th quarter on Saturday, if at all.

We're fine.

sure, we should score, but it isn't like they won't either.  their offense, especially if they are willing to run Florence, is extremely good.  We will be lucky to keep them under 500yds. Our offense really hasn't been good at all since CK got spaghetti'd.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: p1k3 on November 14, 2012, 08:01:11 PM
there's no way we let Florence run on us
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2012, 08:02:33 PM
To beat K-State, you can't have a bad defense.

Baylor's defense is bad.

yeah, but their offense is better than any other offense we've faced this season.  Total offense is better than Oregon.  OREGON.  Plus, the team is just tired.  Lot of energy has been expended over the past month....@ISU, @ WVU, TT, OSU, @ TCU.  Emawtionally, they look spent. Hell, I'm spent and I'm just watching.

TCU and OK State have defenses with a pulse, especially TCU. Baylor doesn't. We won't punt until the 4th quarter on Saturday, if at all.

We're fine.

sure, we should score, but it isn't like they won't either.  their offense, especially if they are willing to run Florence, is extremely good.  We will be lucky to keep them under 500yds. Our offense really hasn't been good at all since CK got spaghetti'd.

Pretty small sample size, and the offense was awesome for a quieter in a game that was essentially a blowout
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 08:05:09 PM
BU's defense can legitimately be compared to KU's last year, and Cosh's from a couple years ago. 

It's hard to give up 500+ yards per game.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 08:09:45 PM
I am 0% worried about this week.

I'm >0% worried about texas.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:11:02 PM
in conference, ISU's defense....yes the same ISU defense that held us to 364yds of offense .....is giving up 500+ yds/game in conf. 
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 08:13:11 PM
in conference, ISU's defense....yes the same ISU defense that held us to 364yds of offense .....is giving up 500+ yds/game in conf.

Has nothing to do with this game.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:15:15 PM
in conference, ISU's defense....yes the same ISU defense that held us to 364yds of offense .....is giving up 500+ yds/game in conf.

Has nothing to do with this game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdsmith.net%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F01%2FJUST-SAYIN.jpg&hash=e3ffc66784f572bba26dda80daa4b0959a328c6c)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: p1k3 on November 14, 2012, 08:15:39 PM
Jake Knott is a hell of a loss
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: puniraptor on November 14, 2012, 08:16:47 PM
Baylor couldn't beat us when they had the heisman trophy winner. Now that we have the heisman trophy winner they are toast.
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 08:17:12 PM
in conference, ISU's defense....yes the same ISU defense that held us to 364yds of offense .....is giving up 500+ yds/game in conf.

Has nothing to do with this game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdsmith.net%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F01%2FJUST-SAYIN.jpg&hash=e3ffc66784f572bba26dda80daa4b0959a328c6c)

You ever heard of Jake Knott?

Just sayin'.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:17:41 PM
Baylor couldn't beat us when they had the heisman trophy winner. Now that we have the heisman trophy winner they are toast.

we've never beaten them with a heisman trophy winner either.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 3maw on November 14, 2012, 08:19:05 PM
zacker you're looking for a reason to worry.
I've never had more confidence in any other team/set of players not necessarily to win, but to perform. everyone has bought in, everyone has the same goal.
can't bring up our record in waco without bringing up our record in norman. or our record against ok lite. history can't beat us this year.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:20:23 PM
jake knott has been out for one game (1 1/2 game?)....but if you're saying that losing an key, player...one that was critical to your defense's success will have a dramatic effect on your defenses' production, then I completely agree. Completely.

sincerely, 

Zims
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: AbeFroman on November 14, 2012, 08:20:50 PM
crap, we beat them last year in epic style, when they had a Heisman winner! Now we have the Heisman winner and they suck ass. They will remember it and be scared shitless. We're going to slaughter them.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
'zacker is a great bbs'r.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2012, 08:21:47 PM
Can you guys fathom someone on this team pulling a Roberson or a Cooper?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 3maw on November 14, 2012, 08:24:30 PM
Can you guys fathom someone on this team pulling a Roberson or a Cooper?

stop it



..and no
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 14, 2012, 08:26:41 PM
I think we're 10-0 when zacker has one of these posts so we should be fine
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:27:11 PM
Can you guys fathom someone on this team pulling a Roberson or a Cooper?

are any of the football players friends with Omari?  this will impact my answer.
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: puniraptor on November 14, 2012, 08:28:32 PM
'zacker is a great bbs'r.

His threads are becoming a cherished tradition!
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 14, 2012, 08:30:40 PM
I don't know why people respond to catzacker or kim carnes posts.
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: puniraptor on November 14, 2012, 08:32:09 PM
I don't know why people respond to catzacker or kim carnes posts.

Zacker is great and regardless of his intentions, his threads lead to legitimate and fun discussions. Kim is just a steamy pile.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: jtksu on November 14, 2012, 08:33:03 PM
We're the #1 team in the nation  Baylor has 1 confy win.  :yawn:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: _33 on November 14, 2012, 08:35:19 PM
The fact that we have everything to lose and they have nothing to lose cannot be understated. Pressure can do awful things to the human body. OSU was yawning before the ISU game last season but they cracked under the pressure. I think we'll win, but I'm also worried.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 08:35:59 PM
We're the #1 team in the nation  Baylor has 1 confy win.  :yawn:

ISU was 5-4 (2-4) when they beat OSU.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: _33 on November 14, 2012, 08:39:24 PM
Baylor could easily have 4 conference wins. Lost some nail biters.
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 08:39:56 PM
'zacker is a great bbs'r.

One of the best. I enjoy his "how full is the glass" threads. Very fun.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kim carnes on November 14, 2012, 08:41:09 PM
The fact that we have everything to lose and they have nothing to lose cannot be understated. Pressure can do awful things to the human body. OSU was yawning before the ISU game last season but they cracked under the pressure. I think we'll win, but I'm also worried.

None of the people on this board watch sports so they don't understand this.
Title: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 08:41:12 PM
We're the #1 team in the nation  Baylor has 1 confy win.  :yawn:

ISU was 5-4 (2-4) when they beat OSU.

Paul Rhoads will not be walking that sideline on Saturday.

And my friend, Art is no Paul.
Title: Re: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: michigancat on November 14, 2012, 08:41:27 PM
We're the #1 team in the nation  Baylor has 1 confy win.  :yawn:

Baylor has also played 4 of 6 conference games on the road.

And these may be my favorite recurring thread on goEMAW.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: p1k3 on November 14, 2012, 08:44:34 PM
this will be our 5th on the road. My God that's brutal
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on November 14, 2012, 08:48:56 PM
I enjoy these threads. Nothing like some unwarranted worrying and our team sucks talking points to really get the blood boiling. It sort of reinvigorates me and gets me ready for the game. Keep on Zackin'!   :ksu:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 14, 2012, 08:53:05 PM
"Just sayin'" = "Got nothin'"

 :zzz:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: GoodForAnother on November 14, 2012, 08:54:27 PM
The fact that we have everything to lose and they have nothing to lose cannot be understated. Pressure can do awful things to the human body. OSU was yawning before the ISU game last season but they cracked under the pressure. I think we'll win, but I'm also worried.

None of the people on this board watch sports so they don't understand this.

I think a lot of people on the board watch KSU football fwiw
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: wetwillie on November 14, 2012, 09:03:52 PM
Zacker where do you get your stats?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: unleashthemob on November 14, 2012, 09:06:27 PM
Why? Why the eff do we do this to ourselves


Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: BostonPancake on November 14, 2012, 09:08:56 PM
Baylor offense = OSU offense = Texas Tech offense = Oklahoma offense = West Virginia offense.

We've played this game before.  We all know how it ends.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: SwiftCat on November 14, 2012, 09:08:58 PM
The fact that we have everything to lose and they have nothing to lose cannot be understated. Pressure can do awful things to the human body. OSU was yawning before the ISU game last season but they cracked under the pressure. I think we'll win, but I'm also worried.

None of the people on this board watch sports so they don't understand this.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wUQr64Rlz_M%2FT7Ab5zGqbxI%2FAAAAAAAABKQ%2FA5679p9HR8Y%2Fs180%2Fidi-amin-laughing.gif&hash=d90c016af9159c22592fe5541ac2f55d9a787d7e)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: catzacker on November 14, 2012, 09:09:38 PM
Zacker where do you get your stats?

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2012/Internet/conf%20stats/2012000025354TD.HTML (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2012/Internet/conf%20stats/2012000025354TD.HTML)

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=242244 (http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=242244)

...editor's note:  I believe in my original post i had baylor as the #2 scoring offense in the nation, they are #7. 
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: CHONGS on November 14, 2012, 09:11:46 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kim carnes on November 14, 2012, 09:14:26 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.

Why do you care if people worry about the game?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: wetwillie on November 14, 2012, 09:15:17 PM
Zacker where do you get your stats?

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2012/Internet/conf%20stats/2012000025354TD.HTML (http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/2012/Internet/conf%20stats/2012000025354TD.HTML)

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=242244 (http://www.big12sports.com/ViewContent.dbml?&DB_OEM_ID=10410&CONTENT_ID=242244)

...editor's note:  I believe in my original post i had baylor as the #2 scoring offense in the nation, they are #7. 

Yea I only called you on it because I'm butthurt you didn't take my bad news bears title suggestion earlier in the week.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: CHONGS on November 14, 2012, 09:21:31 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.

Why do you care if people worry about the game?
I don't care, I am worried about this game.  I worry about every game, that's what I do.

I am just pointing out a truth about the eventuality of being right when predicting a loss every game.  It's a great way to seem like the rebel who isn't blinded by homerism and smarter than the rest.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on November 14, 2012, 09:28:12 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F308ulvt.gif&hash=c626346b04ae07f1663e89ba93a7b2ce08540e32)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Super PurpleCat on November 14, 2012, 09:30:01 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.

Why do you care if people worry about the game?

Because this is the best season in the history of the universe of mankind for EMAW and people who worry incessantly prevent some of us from enjoying it 100% and instead have to enjoy it about 95%.   :dubious:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Katpappy on November 14, 2012, 09:32:42 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F308ulvt.gif&hash=c626346b04ae07f1663e89ba93a7b2ce08540e32)
Way to gif things up to the point...T-Y BP.  :lol:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: CHONGS on November 14, 2012, 09:32:54 PM
disclaimer:
this doesn't mean I don't want catzacker to post these every week.  its a tradition IMHO
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: michigancat on November 14, 2012, 09:32:54 PM
LMAO if Kim or Zack take away any of your enjoyment of this season. Good grief.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: the_ugly_clown on November 14, 2012, 09:33:13 PM
The fact that we have everything to lose and they have nothing to lose cannot be understated. Pressure can do awful things to the human body. OSU was yawning before the ISU game last season but they cracked under the pressure. I think we'll win, but I'm also worried.

Did you know for some dumb reason they went up there on buses, it was a short week, AND a plane full of their colleagues just died in a plane crash. Just fun lil tidbit.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 14, 2012, 09:33:30 PM
What kind of childhood must 'zacker have had to create a defense mechanism like this? 
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Belvis Noland on November 14, 2012, 09:34:49 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.

Yes
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2012, 09:36:20 PM
Hedging your emotional investment
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 14, 2012, 09:36:29 PM
zacker's best work will be the day after we win the NC and he starts a thread about how terribly we played the night before.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 09:36:54 PM
Ben Boyle
@RealBenBoyle
Baylor red zone defense in B12 play: Opp. have scored on 24 of 27 trips. ALL 24 have been TDs. #kstate

 :billdance:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: michigancat on November 14, 2012, 09:36:59 PM
I don't think Zack would rub a loss in anyone's face.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: CHONGS on November 14, 2012, 09:38:07 PM
LMAO if Kim or Zack take away any of your enjoyment of this season. Good grief.
:lol: zack doesn't for sure

While I might be sad if we don't win it all, almost nothing will make this season unenjoyable. it's been amazing and wonderful.  It's already arguably the most successful season in cats fball history!
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: CHONGS on November 14, 2012, 09:38:59 PM
zacker's best work will be the day after we win the NC and he starts a thread about how terribly we played the night before.
I, for one, cannot wait for that thread. 

zack can you promise me you'll do this? please?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 14, 2012, 09:40:54 PM
zacker's best work will be the day after we win the NC and he starts a thread about how terribly we played the night before.
I, for one, cannot wait for that thread. 

zack can you promise me you'll do this? please?

If we beat an undefeated Oregon by a few points, and ND wipes the floor with whoever they play, you know 'zacker's going to come on here and say that ND might jump us in the BCS (is that even possible?).
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Katpappy on November 14, 2012, 09:41:10 PM
You know Zacker is a lot like my old dad.  He loved to argue with anything I said for the joy of agruement.  Even if I started to agree with him, he would change the point so it would seem like I wasn't credible with my logic.  Just keep baiting them Zacker, for the fun of it.  :bait:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cire on November 14, 2012, 09:41:24 PM
LMAO if Kim or Zack take away any of your enjoyment of this season. Good grief.
:lol: zack doesn't for sure

While I might be sad if we don't win it all, almost nothing will make this season unenjoyable. it's been amazing and wonderful.  It's already arguably the most successful season in cats fball history!

The worst thing that could happen is that we had a kick ass year and won a ton of prime time games and beat ou.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: _33 on November 14, 2012, 09:41:42 PM
if you predict doom for every game, the chances are very good you'll be right at some point in time.  and when you are you can proclaim yourself a genius and rub everyone's face in it.  if you're wrong and your team wins every game no one really cares enough to call you on it.  that's the glory of it.

Why do you care if people worry about the game?

Because this is the best season in the history of the universe of mankind for EMAW and people who worry incessantly prevent some of us from enjoying it 100% and instead have to enjoy it about 95%.   :dubious:

Worry and enjoyment are not mutually exclusive. You can do 100% of both.
Title: Re: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: michigancat on November 14, 2012, 09:41:47 PM
LMAO if Kim or Zack take away any of your enjoyment of this season. Good grief.
:lol: zack doesn't for sure

While I might be sad if we don't win it all, almost nothing will make this season unenjoyable. it's been amazing and wonderful.  It's already arguably the most successful season in cats fball history!

Worrying about losing makes it sweeter when you win. I think Zack actually increases my enjoyment. Of course, I'm not a butthurt loser.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 14, 2012, 09:42:37 PM
You know Zacker is a lot like my old dad.  He loved to argue with anything I said for the joy of agruement.  Even if I started to agree with him, he would change the point so it would seem like I wasn't credible with my logic.  Just keep baiting them Zacker, for the fun of it.  :bait:

What's your new dad like?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 09:42:56 PM
Without 'Zacker, this board would be a lot of good smelling people sitting around, saying funny stuff, and agreeing with one another.

Not to say 'Zacker isn't good smelling. 
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Katpappy on November 14, 2012, 09:45:55 PM
You know Zacker is a lot like my old dad.  He loved to argue with anything I said for the joy of agruement.  Even if I started to agree with him, he would change the point so it would seem like I wasn't credible with my logic.  Just keep baiting them Zacker, for the fun of it.  :bait:

What's your new dad like?
He's going to the same place Fatty went to, and he was old.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 14, 2012, 09:55:59 PM
T's & P's (seriously tho)
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Bookcat on November 14, 2012, 09:57:53 PM
only WVU's defense has been ANYTHING compared to what Baylor will roll out on Saturday.

I think it mght take a bit longer to wear it down but Finney, Rooks, Lucas, Whitehair will push their Dline enough to let our running game have more success than we've had vs....

TTech...tied for 2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass
OState...2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass in 3 quarters of play
TCU...yawned our way to a road win vs. the 3rd best defense in the league. OU and KSU being ahead.

and remember,

WE'RE EVERYBODY'S FRANKING SUPER BOWL..


Baylor will have to find a way to get off the field on 3rd down..and they haven't been able to against ANYONE, even their OOC crapheap.

and btw...we lead the Big XII in 3rd down conversion percentage...even with the Osstate and TCU games being a little slower in effeciency.

We GOT THIS. Baylor is another high octane 5-wide chuck n' duck offense that doesn't care about ball control and tackling. Bad mix when you're facing KSU. I'm just hoping for no injuries so the team can lick their wounds over thanksgiving break.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Big Sam on November 14, 2012, 10:02:00 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.

Did not read.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 10:09:10 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Emo EMAW on November 14, 2012, 10:10:51 PM
KU?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 10:11:11 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?
i remember being excited after Baylor beat ULM earlier this season.

 :dunno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Fuktard on November 14, 2012, 10:11:11 PM
only WVU's defense has been ANYTHING compared to what Baylor will roll out on Saturday.

I think it mght take a bit longer to wear it down but Finney, Rooks, Lucas, Whitehair will push their Dline enough to let our running game have more success than we've had vs....

TTech...tied for 2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass
OState...2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass in 3 quarters of play
TCU...yawned our way to a road win vs. the 3rd best defense in the league. OU and KSU being ahead.

and remember,

WE'RE EVERYBODY'S FRANKING SUPER BOWL..


Baylor will have to find a way to get off the field on 3rd down..and they haven't been able to against ANYONE, even their OOC crapheap.

and btw...we lead the Big XII in 3rd down conversion percentage...even with the Osstate and TCU games being a little slower in effeciency.

We GOT THIS. Baylor is another high octane 5-wide chuck n' duck offense that doesn't care about ball control and tackling. Bad mix when you're facing KSU. I'm just hoping for no injuries so the team can lick their wounds over thanksgiving break.

Rooks was awful vs tcu....awful.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 10:14:03 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?
i remember being excited after Baylor beat ULM earlier this season.

 :dunno:

Is ULM the only team in history to beat Arkansas and lose to Arkansas State in the same season? :dunno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Hurricane Cat on November 14, 2012, 10:15:46 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?

SMU  :dunno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: DQ12 on November 14, 2012, 10:19:54 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?
i remember being excited after Baylor beat ULM earlier this season.

 :dunno:

Is ULM the only team in history to beat Arkansas and lose to Arkansas State in the same season? :dunno:
What if i told you the previous team to beat arkansas and arkansas state won a national championship that year?

 :surprised:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 14, 2012, 10:22:58 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?
i remember being excited after Baylor beat ULM earlier this season.

 :dunno:

Is ULM the only team in history to beat Arkansas and lose to Arkansas State in the same season? :dunno:
What if i told you the previous team to beat arkansas and arkansas state won a national championship that year?

 :surprised:

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Katpappy on November 14, 2012, 10:26:02 PM
only WVU's defense has been ANYTHING compared to what Baylor will roll out on Saturday.

I think it mght take a bit longer to wear it down but Finney, Rooks, Lucas, Whitehair will push their Dline enough to let our running game have more success than we've had vs....

TTech...tied for 2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass
OState...2nd in Big XII before we trucked their ass in 3 quarters of play
TCU...yawned our way to a road win vs. the 3rd best defense in the league. OU and KSU being ahead.

and remember,

WE'RE EVERYBODY'S FRANKING SUPER BOWL..


Baylor will have to find a way to get off the field on 3rd down..and they haven't been able to against ANYONE, even their OOC crapheap.

and btw...we lead the Big XII in 3rd down conversion percentage...even with the Osstate and TCU games being a little slower in effeciency.

We GOT THIS. Baylor is another high octane 5-wide chuck n' duck offense that doesn't care about ball control and tackling. Bad mix when you're facing KSU. I'm just hoping for no injuries so the team can lick their wounds over thanksgiving break.
In some weird way, this makes me feel more confident that we will not have any real problems handling Oregon in the NCG. 
DNR... this could jink everything.  :ohno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on November 14, 2012, 10:31:02 PM
Quick, what is Baylor's most impressive win this year?

Sam Houston State.

Held Flanders to 84 yds, though.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Katpappy on November 14, 2012, 11:14:38 PM
T's & P's (seriously tho)
He's been gone for a while.  T-Y for the T's & P's.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: cvmcat on November 15, 2012, 08:52:36 AM
Ben Boyle
@RealBenBoyle
Baylor red zone defense in B12 play: Opp. have scored on 24 of 27 trips. ALL 24 have been TDs. #kstate

 :billdance:

2 of the 3 that didn't result in scores were by squaks.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 8manpick on November 15, 2012, 09:13:01 AM
Didn't read much other than the OP, because these threads are basically the same every week: 

1.  'Zacker melts down (or at least acts like he is) about us probably losing
2.  Everyone else freaks out and says we won't lose
3.  Rinse, repeat
4.  ???
5.  goEMAW profit


Don't ever change 'zacker.  You keep doing you, and keep making this place great.  Go 'Cats, beat the Bears.  8mp concern level: 2%.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 15, 2012, 09:30:16 AM
Without 'Zacker, this board would be a lot of good smelling people sitting around, saying funny stuff, and agreeing with one another.

Not to say 'Zacker isn't good smelling.

i can assure you zacker smells great. if yla is the board's taylor lautner then you can bet that zacker is the george clooney. just some food for thought while we all read his musings.

also, baylor scares me a lot. road games always do. a bad bounce here, an unlucky call there....
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: J on November 15, 2012, 09:36:00 AM
God damn were screwed. Thanks zacker
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 15, 2012, 09:50:25 AM
Without 'Zacker, this board would be a lot of good smelling people sitting around, saying funny stuff, and agreeing with one another.

Not to say 'Zacker isn't good smelling.

i can assure you zacker smells great. if yla is the board's taylor lautner then you can bet that zacker is the george clooney. just some food for thought while we all read his musings.

also, baylor scares me a lot. road games always do. a bad bounce here, an unlucky call there....

I think you should compare every poster to a celebrity. Would be a fun thing to do since there's nothing really going on in Cats sports. Basically combo-fanning season around here.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 8manpick on November 15, 2012, 09:52:38 AM
I think you should compare every poster to a celebrity. Would be a fun thing to do since there's nothing really going on in Cats sports. Basically combo-fanning season around here.

Yeah, you should do this rick
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 15, 2012, 11:57:47 AM
Baylor has to score every possession.  Get 1 stop and 1 turnover and we win.   
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Winters on November 15, 2012, 12:06:00 PM
Ben Boyle
@RealBenBoyle
Baylor red zone defense in B12 play: Opp. have scored on 24 of 27 trips. ALL 24 have been TDs. #kstate

 :billdance:

2 of the 3 that didn't result in scores were by squaks.
Was the other one by ISU?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on November 15, 2012, 12:24:10 PM
So the Baylor Bears....road game...at night..against a team that needs to win 2 of it's next 3 to be bowl eligible...we haven't won in Waco since 2002.

#2 Passing O in the country vs. KSU's #78 ranked passing defense.  This looks like the focus, however their rush offense is pretty good (#34 nationally - to give you an idea, Alabama's is ranked 30th).  They ran for 252yds against OU and they ran Florence more than they had all year with great success - I think they will continue to do so.  Couple that with Zims injury and we have an extremely vulnerable area.  They will try to stretch us across the field, probably more than OSU did and put some pressure on Fergie.  Although our scoring defense is good (#14 ), they are the #2 scoring offense in the country.  If Hayes tries to take Williams away through some bracketting, it will open up some areas not only in the pass but the run.

I won't try to pull out Baylor's defensive stats, but with sexton out, TBL in question, it really puts some pressure on some guys in our WR corp to make plays (I'm going to assume that Baylor will do what OSU and TCU have done and commit quite a few to the LOS to force the pass).  If you haven't noticed, our WR's have done a tremendous job of catching the ball.  If CK has put it on them, they catch it.  Now, insert a few guys (I'm looking at you Miller) who haven't had the reps...unsure hands...lead to missed conversions on third down...tipped balls...lead to interceptions. 

Finally, we looked tired, a step slow in the TCU game.  The OL has gotten whipped up front in both the OSU and TCU games.  I think even Bill hinted last week about us going at it for 3 straight months basically.  I'm concerned because we look like we're running out of gas and everyone is just throwing every possible punch they can think of at us.  At some point, the cracks become breaks.  Have to get through this game, somehow, someway and rest up.

Thoughts, concerns?  I haven't had a solid poop since the OU game.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F308ulvt.gif&hash=c626346b04ae07f1663e89ba93a7b2ce08540e32)
Way to gif things up to the point...T-Y BP.  :lol:

Don't mention it... That's what I'm here for.

 :gocho:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: ECN on November 15, 2012, 12:38:19 PM
Florence and his Machine is going to light up our secondary.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: Prince McJunkins on November 15, 2012, 12:44:14 PM
Florence and his Machine is going to light up our secondary.
:thumbs:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 16, 2012, 09:43:01 AM
Positive thinking stats of the day...

Good indications of defensive line (or defensive front 7 play) come from looking at tackles for loss and sacks.

OSU and TCU are near the top of the league in TFL at 6.60 and 6.56 per game respectively. Both also average 2+ sacks per game.

Baylor is 2nd to last in both, 4.44 TFL per game and 1.22 sacks per game. They've also given up a league high 23 rushing touchdowns (more than TCU and OSU combined).

Finally, Baylor's defensive 3rd down conversion rate is a league worst 60% and their redzone defense gives up a league worst 76% for just touchdowns. There are simply a lot more things to like about K-State's match-up with Baylor than any perceived advantages they may have against our dinged up defense.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 16, 2012, 09:45:14 AM
Florence and his Machine is going to light up our secondary.

Kim Carnes is that you!?!
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kso_FAN on November 16, 2012, 10:12:23 AM
A couple more pertaining to Baylor's success running the ball against OU.

Keep in mind OU doesn't have some sort of dominant run defense this year; they give up over 4 yards per carry (7th in the league) and are last in the league in TFL at only 4.22 per game.

K-State is 5th in TFL at 6.00 per game, 2nd in rush defense YPC at 3.25, and 1st in sacks at 2.6 per game.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: slobber on November 16, 2012, 10:23:51 AM
A couple more pertaining to Baylor's success running the ball against OU.

Keep in mind OU doesn't have some sort of dominant run defense this year; they give up over 4 yards per carry (7th in the league) and are last in the league in TFL at only 4.22 per game.

K-State is 5th in TFL at 6.00 per game, 2nd in rush defense YPC at 3.25, and 1st in sacks at 2.6 per game.
These are great. My confidence is already super high and you are making it scary high.
Wasn't KSU last in sacks in 2010 and near the bottom last year as well?
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 16, 2012, 10:27:43 AM
What is the proper Dr. Pepper drinking etiquette after we win to clinch?  Regular Dr. Pep, DDP, Flaming Dr. Pep... :dunno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: kim carnes on November 16, 2012, 10:35:00 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: star seed 7 on November 16, 2012, 10:38:59 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

keep sawing wood kim carnes.

 :cool:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: "storm"nut on November 16, 2012, 10:39:53 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

Blue balls achieved
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on November 16, 2012, 10:49:50 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

Yea Fiesta Bowl is nothing  :dunno:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 8manpick on November 16, 2012, 10:58:50 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

Yea Fiesta Bowl is nothing  :dunno:

Correct. Fiesta Bowl is nothing.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: AbeFroman on November 16, 2012, 11:04:20 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

I actually agree with kc. eff co-champs. I WANT IT ALL  :curse:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: 'taterblast on November 16, 2012, 11:04:55 AM
well duh, guys
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 16, 2012, 11:06:26 AM
Enjoying each little milestone we hit doesn't mean you have to be satisfied, but you should be happy  :cheers:
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: The Whale on November 16, 2012, 11:10:09 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

I actually agree with kc. eff co-champs. I WANT IT ALL  :curse:

pfft.  We get a trophy.  Trophies are forever.  Think little bro cares that one of their 8 mens' bb titles in a row was a tie with Texas when Texas won the head to head?

Of course, win both and it doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: AbeFroman on November 16, 2012, 11:16:24 AM
We don't clinch anything after winning this game you rough ridin' idiots.  Unless you're into co-championships.

I actually agree with kc. eff co-champs. I WANT IT ALL  :curse:

pfft.  We get a trophy.  Trophies are forever.  Think little bro cares that one of their 8 mens' bb titles in a row was a tie with Texas when Texas won the head to head?

Of course, win both and it doesn't matter.

You're right, little bro doesn't care. That's what makes them so rough ridin' stupid.
Title: Re: Upset Sic'em
Post by: cvmcat on November 16, 2012, 12:48:28 PM
What is the proper Dr. Pepper drinking etiquette after we win to clinch?  Regular Dr. Pep, DDP, Flaming Dr. Pep... :dunno:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.chzbgr.com%2Fcompletestore%2F2011%2F11%2F29%2F7193b90c-1495-4f44-8d8b-8652d991bf97.gif&hash=531c57d8854ad9896c0dfeeb6a2b3fe1b319fe32)