1
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump vs The Fed
« on: December 22, 2018, 09:53:51 PM »
Do people think the Fed is handling this well?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
New idea:
Wall can be solar panels tilted at angles. We get a new deal green energy project and trumpster gets his wall. We can sell some of the energy to Mexico and that will pay to recoup construction. We party.
He’s such a downgrade
https://twitter.com/jenniferjjacobs/status/1076338382014476290?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Health insurance being tied to your employer is ‘legit insane’
The obvious reason he is taking pains to conflate Medicaid and Medicare is that Medicare is incredibly popular, universal (for its population) and has large bargaining power to negotiate reimbursement rates, whereas Medicaid is means tested and sabotaged at every end by states that want to undermine it and because of all of the burdensome work requirements and paper pushing to dissuade people from applying and keeping it has lots more overhead and is rightly regarded as inferior to the coverage provided by Medicare.
I don't think I've ever heard someone advocate for "Medicaid For All." You realize that Medicaid and Medicare are different programs, right?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
While many people like the idea of single payer, almost nobody wants to be on Medicaid. That's a fact.
I know a bunch of olds (65+) who advocate for single payer but who wouldn't be caught dead at a Medicaid provider.
Are those olds on Medicare or self insured?
While many people like the idea of single payer, almost nobody wants to be on Medicaid. That's a fact.
I know a bunch of olds (65+) who advocate for single payer but who wouldn't be caught dead at a Medicaid provider.
Everyone ITT wants single payer and is younger than you
Someone would have to convincingly explain how something like Medicaid expansion hinged on the individual mandate.
Haven't had time to read the opinion yet, but how can a District Court judge make this ruling when SCOTUS has already said it's constitutional?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk