It's quite clear you don't understand U.S. history of the last 30-40 years relative to these situations. Anything less than the eventual total collapse of the NK regime either under the weight of it's own (insert whatever you want here) with some solids pushes from the U.S./West or via U.S./U.S. partner military power would be a first.
It appears you would prefer the latter, Phil. Sad, but not surprising from the New NeoCons.
Your guy completely caved on a meaningless MOU which paid out in plane loads of cash, and the thing didn't even get signed.
You are very good bbsr with your ability to rehash the same 5 things ad naseum and completely ignore news of the day .....great job. Very insightful.
Your recent responses are nonsense.
I'm trying to think of one situation since WWII that the U.S. entered into negotiations with another country, and the other side of the table was superior to the United States economically and militarily and I cannot think of one.
But it sounds like you want diplomacy at the tip of a Nuclear Warhead, Phil.
“I will have a military that’s so strong and powerful, and so respected, we’re not gonna have to nukeanybody
"As part of our defense, we must modernize and rebuild our nuclear arsenal, hopefully never having to use it, but making it so strong and so powerful that it will deter any acts of aggression by any other nation or anyone else,"
You voted for the guy who wants to be unpredictable with nukes and rebuild them....and now is giving an audience to a reclusive dictator committing horrible things to his own people....and gave up war games...but didn't have time for the other stuff. Lol, dax....lol
Maybe you'll get a free stay in the new Trump North Korea resort for your efforts.