Perhaps, but I don't know how much more effective Thomas running stretch-zone plays would've been. Probably a win vs CU, but not much more. He would've helped, but as was said, that wouldn't have changed the issues with the defense. Nor with time of possession.
There is a reason Snyder has this team leading the nation in TOP.
Are you kidding me? Of course an effective running game would affect time of possession...like, a ton. Which makes the defensive stats look better. Which would have made the losses a lot prettier. And our fanbase loves pretty losses. (see: @UCLA)
The problem is that Prince's love child, Freeman, still would have been the focal point and Freeman would still be throwing the ball a ton. I don't believe Prince knew what a good run game was.
Also, having DT would have saved Prince's job. No way they fire him if he is bowl eligible, no way. If he wins at Colorado we would have been 5-2 and the mood of the program is a lot different from the way it was after the CU loss. Then I would like to say "who knows" what would have happened in the following 4 games, OU, ku, MU, NU, but I think we all know those would have still be horrible loses. Leaving all the pressure to win ISU to become bowl eligible. 6-6 gets us bowl eligible... but maybe they don't send us to a bowl, then we could fire him and gone after Patterson and Patterson would be the coach,

. So maybe DT would have helped us land Gary.