Nobody ever accounts for the unbalanced schedule in these things. KSU has the inside track at 3rd because they get to play the Nortards twice while A&M, OSU, OU and even Baylor beat each other up. I'm not sure why it's so hard to figure out, but it always is. I could see 5th seed (or even lower) in the tourny by virture of tiebreaker, but outright 5th? 4 teams with better conference records? That would be a pretty big disappointment.
I think the unbalanced schedule is a good point, but an overemphasized one. Lots of teams are going to play in Lincoln and lose - save UT and ku this season (not sure if the Horns play there this year or not). Hilton Magic is tough - although not so much lately. CU blows - I'll give you that one. MU is down this year, but historically not an easy place to play.
In the South, Tech is not exactly tough. Baylor is overrated. I'm not sold on A&M. UT and OU are quality teams this season and Okie St is always a tough place to play. Conventional wisdom claims that the South is superior. It may be, but the gap is no longer that much, at least not enough to make the argument that unbalanced scheduling is what will make KSU finish 3rd (or wherever)...
Frank agrees w/ my general points...
"There's been so much said about the issue of the North and South, whatever it may be. Historically, on this side of the league, (it's) just so difficult for people to go on the road and win. The only way you can do that is to get enough players that can do it."
18-18 - North v. South record last season...
FWIW - I say the Cats finish 4th in conf and make the dance...
