csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board. way better than oxlp956
Chiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.
Quote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.when they were the Colts
Quote from: RonLongshaft on April 14, 2009, 10:44:30 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.when they were the ColtsJeebus you're gay, let's see Baltimore won it more recently.Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:47:34 PMQuote from: RonLongshaft on April 14, 2009, 10:44:30 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.when they were the ColtsJeebus you're gay, let's see Baltimore won it more recently.Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TDare you fracking retarded? i was backing up your argument
Can't wait until the Chiefs beat the Steelers.
Too bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TD
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.2007.
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:47:34 PMToo bad your illegal blocking schemes don't seem to work without a superstar RB like TDIt's hard to win when you get penalized each play for our illegal blocking. . .oh wait, blocking someone isn't illegal in the NFL. oh, and our blocking scheme is pretty good, when was the last time that we didn't finish in the top half of the league in rushing offense? Quit being jealous that Denver is an actual good football franchise. We've won as many superbowls as you've been to.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 12:07:09 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.2007.Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the Chefs
The last 5 games (Denver twice, Buffalo and Cleveland at home and at Cincinnati) are the ones that catch my eye. If this team comes together maybe we can go on a run at the end of the regular season and, who knows, maybe sneak in like we did a couple of years ago. Anyways.....It's GREAT to be a Royals and Chiefs fan again.
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 07:38:10 AMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 12:07:09 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.2007.Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the ChefsThey lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:05:18 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 07:38:10 AMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 12:07:09 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.2007.Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the ChefsThey lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.Simply looking at the numbers a 2 touchdown loss doesn't sound quite a bit better. And that was the worst Chiefs team I have witnessed.
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 04:38:09 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:05:18 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 07:38:10 AMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 12:07:09 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 14, 2009, 10:42:41 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 14, 2009, 09:45:25 PMQuote from: KCcat28 on April 14, 2009, 09:31:29 PMChiefs have probably the toughest first half in all of the NFL... I mean baltimore, dallas, new york giants, redskins, I am missing a few others too but wow very brutal for a team in rebuilding more under a new regime.baltimore and washington are decent at best. I'll give you dallas and new york.When was the last time Baltimore was an easy win? puh-lease.2007.Naw just cause they had a bad record doesn't mean they were an easy win, just like being .500 doesn't mean the donkeys were a lot better than the ChefsThey lost by double digits 6 out of their 11 losses, and the teams they beat had a combined record of 30-50. the only team they beat with a winning record was the Steelers and that was the last week of the season where they didn't even play Roethlisberger or Hines Ward. They were an easy win. And Denver was quite a bit better than Kansas City last year. You'd have to be mentally retarded to think that denver wasn't.Simply looking at the numbers a 2 touchdown loss doesn't sound quite a bit better. And that was the worst Chiefs team I have witnessed.So the Titans weren't quite a bit better than the Jets?
I dunno who won?
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:16:07 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 09:59:38 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:16:07 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 10:09:13 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 09:59:38 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:16:07 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.
Quote from: QuinnMac on April 16, 2009, 07:07:04 AMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 10:09:13 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 09:59:38 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:16:07 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.
Quote from: rundown87 on April 16, 2009, 11:11:30 AMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 16, 2009, 07:07:04 AMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 10:09:13 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 09:59:38 PMQuote from: rundown87 on April 15, 2009, 09:16:07 PMQuote from: QuinnMac on April 15, 2009, 08:13:32 PMI dunno who won?Jets won by 3 scores.Then apparently the winning team was better, because that is why score and records are kept. Or did the donkeys get a participation trophy last year I was unaware of?Yeah, but Denver beat Kansas City, so that makes Denver better than KC. But no, because you are saying that KC is better than Denver because they beat Denver, which doesn't make any sense because Denver is better because they beat KC. But. . .Kansas City beat Denver. . .so wait. . .if Kansas City is better than Denver, but Denver is better than KC. I guess that means. . . you are stupid.The worst Chiefs team I have ever seen, that won only 2 games. Beat the donkeys by two touchdowns, how "good" were the donkeys again? If you want I can keep rephrasing these posts till one literally smacks you in the face.I never said Denver was good last year, just quite a bit better than the Chiefs. The only argument you would have is if you swept us, but that did not happen.You post more about Denver than K-State on here