Date: 15/08/25 - 00:25 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: For Dax . . . XOXOXO  (Read 2269 times)

February 28, 2009, 07:23:33 PM
Reply #30

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
Could you throw in a few more adjectives to go along with "clueless dumbass?"  TIA.


 :curse:

Anti-bathing, half-wit, brain dead, dipshat, crack head.....

February 28, 2009, 07:26:18 PM
Reply #31

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
LOL at Lew Perkins stealing $3million a year from the students in fees.


February 28, 2009, 08:13:34 PM
Reply #32

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU

February 28, 2009, 08:16:51 PM
Reply #33

EmporiaWildcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 925
You know you're a GIGANTIC loser when you have 679 posts on your rivals' message board.

Go to "The Hawk", buy a cold one, and get a life dood.
I'd much rather have a 69 year old coach than one that weighs 400+ pounds.

February 28, 2009, 10:24:54 PM
Reply #34

tfurn

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 96
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?

Refer to your previous post, liberal piece-o-shat.


This country is founded on liberalism.  Regardless... you're beyond confused.  For some reason you brought up Allen Fieldhouse (which was renovated in '05 and is currently having $50 million + put into it) in response to my question about K-State's practice facilities.  How's the construction coming along?

Thats funny. I thought this country has always balanced conservative and liberal views    :dunno:   :popcorn:

February 28, 2009, 10:33:29 PM
Reply #35

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?

Refer to your previous post, liberal piece-o-shat.


This country is founded on liberalism.  Regardless... you're beyond confused.  For some reason you brought up Allen Fieldhouse (which was renovated in '05 and is currently having $50 million + put into it) in response to my question about K-State's practice facilities.  How's the construction coming along?


Thats funny. I thought this country has always balanced conservative and liberal views    :dunno:   :popcorn:

This country was founded on the belief that smaller government was best and that the individual should have control over his life and property.
Didn't pass many history or gov classes, did ya?

February 28, 2009, 10:42:45 PM
Reply #36

ednksu

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1935
actually this country is a Hamiltonian democracy not a Jeffersonian democracy


oh and Dax, settle down a bit, you have proved them wrong again.  Dont kill yourself over it.  We can all point to areas where ku people make up and bend stats to meet their own needs.
Be a winner today

February 28, 2009, 10:46:56 PM
Reply #37

Lurker

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 467
this country is a constitutional republic not a democracy

February 28, 2009, 11:20:56 PM
Reply #38

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
this country is a constitutional republic not a democracy

True. Also supports my point:

Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and conflict; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.

-- James Madison

March 01, 2009, 08:41:19 AM
Reply #39

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
actually this country is a Hamiltonian democracy not a Jeffersonian democracy


oh and Dax, settle down a bit, you have proved them wrong again.  Dont kill yourself over it.  We can all point to areas where ku people make up and bend stats to meet their own needs.

Huh?  What about the Department of Education website are we making up?

I would suggest it's just the opposite.  ku fans show official numbers, K-State fans bury their heads in the sand and shriek that they must not be true . . .
 :runaway:
« Last Edit: March 01, 2009, 08:43:05 AM by KansasSinceSept2007 »

March 01, 2009, 09:16:43 AM
Reply #40

ednksu

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1935
actually this country is a Hamiltonian democracy not a Jeffersonian democracy


oh and Dax, settle down a bit, you have proved them wrong again.  Dont kill yourself over it.  We can all point to areas where ku people make up and bend stats to meet their own needs.

Huh?  What about the Department of Education website are we making up?

I would suggest it's just the opposite.  ku fans show official numbers, K-State fans bury their heads in the sand and shriek that they must not be true . . .
 :runaway:

for instance: On a clubsi (car forum)

ku fan: We're not a white cracker U, we are only 76% cracker!
Me: No you really are
ku fan: But I have these stats that say so!
Me: No, the "stats" you use show non respondents and alien non residents as being non-white
ku fan:  :poke:


So the next time you get a "fact" sheet from the local brown shirts be sure to double check your numbers and more importantly understand how they get those numbers before you look like a jackass out in public.
Be a winner today

March 01, 2009, 11:25:30 AM
Reply #41

ksushawn

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 55
  • Personal Text
    Holy Crap!
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?


Refer to your previous post, liberal piece-o-shat.


This country is founded on liberalism. 
:lol: :tongue: :jerkoff:  It's obvious where this moron went (or wants to go) to school!  I think K-who needs to change their colors from red and blue to commy pink! I would have said red, but pink is so much more fitting! :ku:
« Last Edit: March 01, 2009, 11:28:44 AM by ksushawn »

March 01, 2009, 11:51:54 AM
Reply #42

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
LOL at BigJkutard and KansasForeverTard.

Athletic departments do their accounting differently.  In fact it wouldn't shock me at all if Lew wasn't treating bond sales as operating revenue, afterall he's treated capital project giving in the past as operating revenue.

Look at MU, their DOE report almost always looks like that . . . several years ago they got nearly $35 million in donations from Wal-Mart boy and a Mizzou booster group in KC, but their revenues in their DOE report didn't reflect those numbers at all.

Baylor's spending about $35 million on a new indoor practice facility and new offices which are privately funded, but they don't reflect it in their DOE Equity in Athletics report, because the money is handled by the Bear Foundation.

LOL.

Let me see if I understand this..

You're saying that ku inflates its numbers?

Is there any precedence for that?

March 01, 2009, 02:38:46 PM
Reply #43

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
kansasforeverTard . . . where did I say ku was "making anything up"?  How got damn stupid are you??

This isn't that hard, different schools do their athletic department accounting differently . . . go to the DOE EiA website and read the disclaimer right on the front page. 

All I am saying is that in the past, ku has treated capital project giving as revenue . . . until I actually see ku's financial report (which apparently they don't post anymore) how do we know they haven't done the same thing again??   Last Spring ku sold a bunch of revenue bonds for facilities improvements . . . are you sure ku didn't count that as revenue??  No,  you're not sure, because until you see the actual financial report you wouldn't know.   The report that schools give the DOE is NOT a true financial report. 

Plus, how hard is it to understand that some schools have entirely separate fund raising arms for their athletic departments, wholly separate entities from a structural standpoint and it's entirely plausible that those schools DO NOT count the money those entities generate for the athletic department say for capital projects as athletic department revenue. 

Again, this isn't that hard, but leave it to the ku tard to make it hard.


March 01, 2009, 08:02:36 PM
Reply #44

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
kansasforeverTard . . . where did I say ku was "making anything up"?  How got damn stupid are you??

This isn't that hard, different schools do their athletic department accounting differently . . . go to the DOE EiA website and read the disclaimer right on the front page. 

All I am saying is that in the past, ku has treated capital project giving as revenue . . . until I actually see ku's financial report (which apparently they don't post anymore) how do we know they haven't done the same thing again??   Last Spring ku sold a bunch of revenue bonds for facilities improvements . . . are you sure ku didn't count that as revenue??  No,  you're not sure, because until you see the actual financial report you wouldn't know.   The report that schools give the DOE is NOT a true financial report. 

Plus, how hard is it to understand that some schools have entirely separate fund raising arms for their athletic departments, wholly separate entities from a structural standpoint and it's entirely plausible that those schools DO NOT count the money those entities generate for the athletic department say for capital projects as athletic department revenue. 

Again, this isn't that hard, but leave it to the ku tard to make it hard.



Hmmmmm . . . I know that ku is destroying K-State every way possible athletic department wise . . . therefore according to daxspeak there can't be any truth to the official Department of Education statistics that reflect that domination financially as well, either?

 :lol:
 

March 01, 2009, 10:02:56 PM
Reply #45

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Didn't say that either KansasForeverTard . . . but once again, the EinA report is not an official financial statement.

Again . . . you just gurggling BigJkuTard's schlong everytime you post on here, you've done ZERO research into this.

Plus again  :lol: at Lew for having the audacity to steal $3 million a year from the students in fees, and still making them buy tickets on top of that . . . kind of sad really.




« Last Edit: March 01, 2009, 10:12:29 PM by sonofdaxjones »

March 01, 2009, 10:20:15 PM
Reply #46

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
KansasForeverTard . . .

If you can muster up enough intelligence, read this article and then we'll talk . . . this of course is just the tip of the iceberg, it doesn't even address how money raised by separate foundations is to be accounted for etc. etc. etc.

http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2006/06/23/ncaa

March 01, 2009, 10:21:16 PM
Reply #47

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
Same person? You tell me.........





March 02, 2009, 12:38:21 PM
Reply #48

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
KansasForeverTard . . .

If you can muster up enough intelligence, read this article and then we'll talk . . . this of course is just the tip of the iceberg, it doesn't even address how money raised by separate foundations is to be accounted for etc. etc. etc.

http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2006/06/23/ncaa

You're ignoring the giant elephant in the room, Dax.

Are you really going to insist that the University of Kansas is not burying K-State every way possible? 

March 02, 2009, 12:48:31 PM
Reply #49

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
I think that's the consensus, einstein.

March 02, 2009, 12:54:23 PM
Reply #50

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
I think that's the consensus, einstein.

Except for dax.  Like a defense attorney, his entire argument is based on attempting to deconstruct the massive amounts of evidence presented against him.

The next time he can actually produce any evidence to support his own position would be the first. 

I wouldn't really care, but I'm amused to no end at the angry lengths dax will go to to plunge his head in the sand.  It is really quite entertaining. 

March 02, 2009, 12:56:34 PM
Reply #51

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
I think that's the consensus, einstein.

Except for dax.  Like a defense attorney, his entire argument is based on attempting to deconstruct the massive amounts of evidence presented against him.

The next time he can actually produce any evidence to support his own position would be the first. 

I wouldn't really care, but I'm amused to no end at the angry lengths dax will go to to plunge his head in the sand.  It is really quite entertaining. 

I'm not agreeing with you, dumbass.