Date: 15/08/25 - 03:53 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: For Dax . . . XOXOXO  (Read 2303 times)

February 28, 2009, 02:43:08 PM
Read 2303 times

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
I know you've already seen this during your hourly perusals of Phog.net, but I thought I'd give you a chance to respond.  I can't wait to see what your post-Beasley, post-Prince isn't bona fide horrible yet numbers from 08-09 are.  Courtesy of BigJku316.

*******************************************
Numbers from July 1, 2007 through June 30th, 2008

ku
Revenue:  $86,009,257
Expense:  $65,707,114

K-State
Revenue:  $48,160,113
Expenses: $40,409,150

MU
Revenue:  $49,113,786
Exepense: $48,793,770

NU
Revenue:  $75,492,884
Expense:  $66,862,007

ISU
Revenue:  $38,642,013
Expense:  $38,642,013

CU
Revenue:  $52,631,896
Expense:  $48,368,260

OU
Revenue:  $77,098,009
Expense:  $76,945,883

UT
Revenue:  $120,288,370
Expense:  $100,982,596

A&M
Revenue:  $74,781,640
Expense:  $72,449,292

OSU
Revenue:  $88,554,438
Expense:  $59,168,327

Tech
Revenue:  $42,844,855
Expense:  $39,247,970

Baylor
Revenue:  $44,151,763
Expense:  $44,151,763

By Revenue

UT:   $120,288,370
OSU:$88,554,438
ku:  $86,009,257
OU:  $77,098,009
NU:  $75,492,884
A&M:$74,781,640
CU:  $52,631,896
MU:  $49,113,786
KSU: $48,160,113
BU:  $44,151,763
TT:   $42,844,855
ISU:  $38,642,013

February 28, 2009, 02:45:25 PM
Reply #1

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

February 28, 2009, 02:46:22 PM
Reply #2

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
We're like right next to MU. I guess that's alright.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

February 28, 2009, 02:47:11 PM
Reply #3

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
ku presently has the second-highest profit margin in the Big 12.  Very nice.  I suspect OSU has taken a bit of a hit in the last few months.   :runaway:

February 28, 2009, 02:48:55 PM
Reply #4

yoga-lika_abana

  • Guest
ku presently has the second-highest profit margin in the Big 12.  Very nice.  I suspect OSU has taken a bit of a hit in the last few months.   :runaway:
usually winning correlates into profit :dunno: so bfd. Two Cents

February 28, 2009, 02:49:37 PM
Reply #5

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
ku presently has the second-highest profit margin in the Big 12.  Very nice.  I suspect OSU has taken a bit of a hit in the last few months.   :runaway:
usually winning correlates into profit :dunno: so bfd. Two Cents

Excellent point.   :thumbsup:

February 28, 2009, 03:06:26 PM
Reply #6

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
LOL at BigJkutard and KansasForeverTard.

Athletic departments do their accounting differently.  In fact it wouldn't shock me at all if Lew wasn't treating bond sales as operating revenue, afterall he's treated capital project giving in the past as operating revenue.

Look at MU, their DOE report almost always looks like that . . . several years ago they got nearly $35 million in donations from Wal-Mart boy and a Mizzou booster group in KC, but their revenues in their DOE report didn't reflect those numbers at all.

Baylor's spending about $35 million on a new indoor practice facility and new offices which are privately funded, but they don't reflect it in their DOE Equity in Athletics report, because the money is handled by the Bear Foundation.

LOL.

February 28, 2009, 03:10:03 PM
Reply #7

cireksu

  • Guest
Dax owns the Phog tards again.

February 28, 2009, 03:39:39 PM
Reply #8

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Yeah, I'm sure K-State's athletic department found a way to sweep almost $40 million in revenue under the rug.  Winning the National Championship and Orange Bowl wouldn't have created any separation for ku.


 :thumbsup:

February 28, 2009, 03:42:20 PM
Reply #9

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
With all those super secret private donations just flooding into K-State's athletic department, I'm surprised construction hasn't even started yet on the new basketball facility. 


 :confused:


February 28, 2009, 03:51:19 PM
Reply #10

Brewcrew

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 672
Notice she throws crap at the wall and can prove nothing. classic jaynie.

February 28, 2009, 03:52:22 PM
Reply #11

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
Why would we want a new basketball arena? We are just tickled pink with our 54 year old, urine and sweat smelling, low concession area'd, piece of crap fieldhouse. Oh, I guess that's your's, isn't it?

February 28, 2009, 03:56:57 PM
Reply #12

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?

February 28, 2009, 04:02:50 PM
Reply #13

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?

Refer to your previous post, liberal piece-o-shat.

February 28, 2009, 04:04:25 PM
Reply #14

KansasForever

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 949
LOL at BigJkutard and KansasForeverTard.

Athletic departments do their accounting differently.  In fact it wouldn't shock me at all if Lew wasn't treating bond sales as operating revenue, afterall he's treated capital project giving in the past as operating revenue.

Look at MU, their DOE report almost always looks like that . . . several years ago they got nearly $35 million in donations from Wal-Mart boy and a Mizzou booster group in KC, but their revenues in their DOE report didn't reflect those numbers at all.

Baylor's spending about $35 million on a new indoor practice facility and new offices which are privately funded, but they don't reflect it in their DOE Equity in Athletics report, because the money is handled by the Bear Foundation.

LOL.

LOL at dax.

Years of owning K-State in every sport that matters will only get worse.  You are basically in a little raft going through the rapids wondering what that infernal thundering downstream is.  

Watching the lengths you go to to stick your head in the sand as ku hammers K-State every way possible (revenue, football, basketball, facilities, national licensing popularity, conference titles, national titles, head-to-head, etc., ad nauseum ad nauseum) is just way too fun a sport to disengage from.  

Cheers!!!!!!!!

February 28, 2009, 04:08:31 PM
Reply #15

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
umm...dax is right. those ku numbers are hilarious.

Quote
LOL at dax.

Years of owning K-State in every sport that matters will only get worse.  You are basically in a little raft going through the rapids wondering what that infernal thundering downstream is. 

Watching the lengths you go to to stick your head in the sand as ku hammers K-State every way possible (revenue, football, basketball, facilities, national licensing popularity, conference titles, national titles, head-to-head, etc., ad nauseum ad nauseum) is just way too fun a sport to disengage from. 

Cheers!!!!!

LOL. You have to be joking. ku hammering KSU?  :lol:
« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 04:11:55 PM by fatty fat fat »
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

February 28, 2009, 05:08:10 PM
Reply #16

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
What the f*ck are you talking about, Republican douchebag?

Refer to your previous post, liberal piece-o-shat.


This country is founded on liberalism.  Regardless... you're beyond confused.  For some reason you brought up Allen Fieldhouse (which was renovated in '05 and is currently having $50 million + put into it) in response to my question about K-State's practice facilities.  How's the construction coming along?

February 28, 2009, 05:23:47 PM
Reply #17

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
It's a practice facility. Couldn't give a frack less.

February 28, 2009, 06:02:59 PM
Reply #18

ChokeSlam

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 92
Money smack either way is franking retarded.

February 28, 2009, 06:26:58 PM
Reply #19

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
But...but....but.....he started it!

February 28, 2009, 06:28:34 PM
Reply #20

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Just go do some research . . . a couple of years ago Lew counted money given for the ku football facility as operating revenue, then the next year in ku's fiscal report that had to note the drop in operating revenue for athletics because the previous year they counted a capital donation as operating revenue.  

LOL @ ku being the last school to get their DOE Equity in Athletics report in, and of course ku still hasn't posted FY 2008 financials on its website like they have every other years, so there's no way the resident ku validators can prove anything.

All you have to do is a little research, for example several years ago I looked at NC State's EinA report and was amazed at how low their revenues were considering the millions I knew they were getting in private donations . . . come to find out all the money was handled by the Wolfpack Club and was not counted as revenue for the athletic department.  

But if the resident ku validators don't want to believe it . . . who gives a frank.

Plus Bentard the Resident ku Validator Douchebag . . . I never said anything about K-State getting "secret" contributions.  Being the dumbass that you are, I'll explain again that the first phase of the Wildcat Victory Campaign is going to be financed with Bonds, just like ku is doing with all their current "improvements".  Plus I guess you missed the article a few weeks ago where Dana Anderson pretty much said he's broke.





« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 06:31:25 PM by sonofdaxjones »

February 28, 2009, 06:35:29 PM
Reply #21

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Keep the anecdotal stories coming, 'Pad.  Like they always say, when the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.  There's no doubt that ku's athletic department rakes in more revenue annually than K-State.  It's not even a question at this point, so don't pretend like K-State has all these private donations that are unaccounted for, because you don't.

February 28, 2009, 06:38:06 PM
Reply #22

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
They're not anecdotal stories . . . I've done the actual research and discussed this many times long before you hit us with your amazing douchebaggery.

Plus dumbass, I never said there was "all these private donations that are unaccounted for" . . . but it's absolute fact that the contributions to KSU athletics are held on account at the KSU Foundation, as well as all KSU athletic endowments are held on account at the KSU foundation. 

Geezus you are an amazing dumbass.




February 28, 2009, 06:47:47 PM
Reply #23

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
If only we had the numbers for each Big 12 program's revenue and expenses....


 :curse:  :chainsaw:

February 28, 2009, 06:50:59 PM
Reply #24

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
If only we had the numbers for each Big 12 program's revenue and expenses....


 :curse:  :chainsaw:

We do, but what the criteria the DOE has for the report, doesn't take into account foundations that exist separately from athletics . . . this isn't that hard, but I am not the least bit surprised you can't figure it out.  For example at NC State, the Wolfpack club is a separate foundation that just happens to support NC State athletics, the same for the Bear Foundation at Baylor.   Their financials would not be reported on the DOE EiA report . . . but again, you're a dumbass, and wouldn't have the first clue. 

February 28, 2009, 07:05:17 PM
Reply #25

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Oh, I understand your excuse, and I'm not the least bit surprised you decided to use it.


 :thumbsup:

February 28, 2009, 07:09:14 PM
Reply #26

GoldbrickGangBoss

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2590
  • Personal Text
    THE b IS NOT CAPITALIZED
Dammit, Dax. Use a more creative word than 'dumbass' all the time.

Remember when you use to make variations on names and make a long string of insults at one time all in one sentence? Those were your best days. Return to them.
I'm telling you, this is not ANYTHING like the team from the beginning of conference play. You will see no more blowouts like what happened in OOC.  If we lose, it will not because these kids gave up, and it will be at the buzzer. -Rodless, before 97-70

February 28, 2009, 07:09:26 PM
Reply #27

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644

February 28, 2009, 07:11:45 PM
Reply #28

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Could you throw in a few more adjectives to go along with "clueless dumbass?"  TIA.


 :curse:

February 28, 2009, 07:13:01 PM
Reply #29

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
LOL at the 22 year old ku guy spending Saturday night on a K-State BBS.