tech x's and o's

[fatty fat fat]

pretty pumped for this game (i'm assuming mr. "cas" is as well)

here is their profiel http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Texas%20Tech

seems like they do a good job keeping the oppy off the glass (which negates a ksu strength)


they are terrible at forcing turnover, which is a good thing for us. (http://kenpom.com/expsked.php?team=Kansas%20St.) <--look at to% on offense

thoughts?

[Chingon]

From outside an "X" and "O" explanation, I am am worried about this game.  Dunno exactly why yet, but I fear a cold game from our guards.

[steve dave]

Everyone on here ('cept cf0506) is worried about this game.  I haven't decided if I am or not

[RonLongshaft]

this game worries me cause it should be a W for sure but, we're all hey we play that team saturday that wants to be our rivals, won't they ever learn, etc.

[cas]

pretty pumped for this game (i'm assuming mr. "cas" is as well)

here is their profiel http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Texas%20Tech

seems like they do a good job keeping the oppy off the glass (which negates a ksu strength)


they are terrible at forcing turnover, which is a good thing for us. (http://kenpom.com/expsked.php?team=Kansas%20St.) <--look at to% on offense

thoughts?

When aren't I?!?  

This game is a little dangerous, Tech has played well in their last two games. If we can break out and get on them early and get their few true "bigs" in some foul trouble, this game will be over by halftime.

[pissclams]

I'm past worrying about our shooting percentage, frank is willing to force possessions to get past a garbage shooting nights - which we've seen in several of the past few games from some of our dewds.. 

[ltrain37]

I just get the feeling that we're due for a stink-bomb...nothing to base that on other than gut feeling.

[ksu_FAN]

Everyone on here ('cept cf0506) is worried about this game.  I haven't decided if I am or not

Not that worried.  Like the match-up.

[catzacker]

dribble towards the wing defender, back door cut. 

[pissclams]

ltrain37- base your feeling on the past 20 years of K-State 'oops.  its ok man, just do it.

[fatty fat fat]

I'm past worrying about our shooting percentage, frank is willing to force possessions to get past a garbage shooting nights - which we've seen in several of the past few games from some of our dewds.. 

-nice take pissclams. enjoy your particular wednesday.

[yoga-lika_abana]

I hope Voskuil won't blow up again.

[cireksu]

very nervous.  have a feeling that we'll turn the ball over a bunch and miss shots.

[MOKSUAZ]

i've been all  for this game since we squeeked out saturday's win. 

[kougar24]

Everyone on here ('cept cf0506) is worried about this game.  I haven't decided if I am or not

Not that worried.  Like the match-up.

 

[sonofdaxjones]

Why would anyone worry about K-state's shooting %, they've shot the ball so well the last couple of games. 

A&M:  Game-36.9%

21 Clemente, Denis..... *  5-16   2-8    2-2    0  0  0   1  14  3  0  0  0  35
23 Sutton, Dominique... *  0-4    0-0    0-0    0  3  3   4   0  1  2  1  0  20
42 Kent, Darren........ * 5-12   1-3    2-2    5  4  9   3  13  0  1  0  0  32

Iowa State:  Game-32.7%

42     Kent, Darren     f     4-10     0-4     2-2     1-8     9     4     10     0     2     1     0     29
00     Pullen, Jacob     g     5-12     1-5     2-2     0-1     1     2     13     1     2     0     2     24
21     Clemente, Denis     g     4-13     2-5     5-8     2-5     7     1     15     2     2     0     0     33
01     Brown, Fred     -     1-5     1-3     0-0     1-1     2     1     3     1     0     0     1     25


Love, love, love DK at 1-7 from 3 . . . you go White Tiger!!

[cireksu]

true, ISU blows though and A&M was a WTF? kind of win.

[steve dave]

true, ISU blows though and A&M was a WTF? kind of win.

Yeah, but TTech arguably blows just as much as ISU.

[Skycat]

Not worried.  They're a lousy defensive team, and have done nothing on the road.

Would take a bad effort by the Catz to lose this one.

[ksu_FAN]

Not worried.  They're a lousy defensive team, and have done nothing on the road.

Would take a bad effort by the Catz to lose this one.

They did beat Miss St, a decent SEC team.  Then again, they also lost to Lamar.

[hemmy]

I see no real X's and O's chat in this thread

[mirakulous]

I guess we could play even worse than we did against ISU or aTm, but Frank's a good motivator and our guys know they've got a good thing going.  I don't see them coming out flat.

Upsets are why we play the games, but this would be one hell of an upsetting upset.  All the nerves on this board are starting to make me  

[Skycat]

Not worried.  They're a lousy defensive team, and have done nothing on the road.

Would take a bad effort by the Catz to lose this one.

They did beat Miss St, a decent SEC team.  Then again, they also lost to Lamar.

Thought that was a neutral site game.

[ksu_FAN]

Not worried.  They're a lousy defensive team, and have done nothing on the road.

Would take a bad effort by the Catz to lose this one.

They did beat Miss St, a decent SEC team.  Then again, they also lost to Lamar.

Thought that was a neutral site game.

Yeah, my mistake.  Miss St was neutral.  So they haven't won on the road all year and have 1 neutral site win.

[michigancat]

ISU was dangerously close, peeps.  We lose wed. night.

[Skycat]

No way 06 tamu loses this game.

[ksu_FAN]

ISU was dangerously close, peeps.  We lose wed. night.

ISU is a worse match-up.  JMHO.

[sys]

isu is better. 


martin finally delivers on uptempo talk.  katz roll.

[GoodForAnother]

At first I was like 

Thu Nov 20    (NR) East Central    W, 167-116   120        Home    3-0

But then

Sat Dec 13    (209) Lamar    L, 85-79   79        Away    7-2

I lol'd

[Chingon]

If tech drops a hunny on us, I am going to be very upset.