Date: 23/08/25 - 12:08 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: 'Cats vs. 'Hawks Predictions  (Read 2163 times)

January 11, 2009, 08:40:57 PM
Read 2163 times

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
We are probably going to get killed.

Cats-65

ku- 82
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

January 11, 2009, 08:43:36 PM
Reply #1

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

January 11, 2009, 08:45:48 PM
Reply #2

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
Qatz - 153
Beaks - 152
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

January 11, 2009, 08:46:45 PM
Reply #3

cireksu

  • Guest

January 11, 2009, 08:50:21 PM
Reply #4

SCHITZ

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 296
  • Personal Text
    haha
Frank Martin 78

University of Kansas 66

January 11, 2009, 08:59:56 PM
Reply #5

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Manny Dies - 64
Jeff Boschee - 89

January 11, 2009, 09:01:20 PM
Reply #6

KCcat28

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2682
  • Personal Text
    All Rise... The Judge is in the house.
Cats - 66

 :ku: - 70

Kstate shoots better but struggles at times defensively against Aldrich who goes for 20 and 12

January 11, 2009, 09:07:03 PM
Reply #7

drew4ksu

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 43

January 11, 2009, 09:09:35 PM
Reply #8

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
&@#% you guys.

Kstate 84
ku 75


I still want my cooler, bitches!

January 11, 2009, 09:17:02 PM
Reply #9

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
frack you guys.

Kstate 84
ku 75

I'll be fine with 59-55
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

January 11, 2009, 09:27:57 PM
Reply #10

McGrowlTowelZac

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4123
  • Personal Text
    This ZERO is my Hero
Self is gonna coach circles around Frank and our no post boys.

ku-68
KSU-59

A late run by us makes it look respectable.  :blank:

January 11, 2009, 09:32:04 PM
Reply #11

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Self is gonna coach circles around Frank and our no post boys.

ku-68
KSU-59

A late run by us makes it look respectable.  :blank:

Hey KSU fans, you know when you get angry about the perception that Frank can't coach? you shouldn't, considering a good chunk of our own fanbase believes the same.

It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

January 11, 2009, 09:34:08 PM
Reply #12

McGrowlTowelZac

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4123
  • Personal Text
    This ZERO is my Hero
Self is gonna coach circles around Frank and our no post boys.

ku-68
KSU-59

A late run by us makes it look respectable.  :blank:

Hey KSU fans, you know when you get angry about the perception that Frank can't coach? you shouldn't, considering a good chunk of our own fanbase believes the same.



Not sure what that comment means.  I really don't have an issue with Frank, just felt like venting unnecessarily on someone today.

January 11, 2009, 09:55:45 PM
Reply #13

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
K0-0S0T0A0T0E0 7090
K0U0 7060


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

January 11, 2009, 10:00:31 PM
Reply #14

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65


January 11, 2009, 10:02:30 PM
Reply #15

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

January 11, 2009, 10:11:16 PM
Reply #16

Winters

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4261

January 11, 2009, 10:14:22 PM
Reply #17

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.

I have self esteem, my entire sense of self worth doesn't revolve around a basketball or football team like most ku fans.   Therefore I am more than willing too admit that at least in AFH and against our collection of stay puff marshmallows that are our big guys . . . they stand a good chance of beating K-State rather handily.   I expect them to come out with their hair on fire . . . we are pretty much their Super Bowl.


January 11, 2009, 10:31:05 PM
Reply #18

kstatecollegian

  • Guest
Not sure if this has any effect on your predictions. The officials for Tuesday's game are John Higgins, Scott Thornley and Steve Welmer. However, to my understanding Welmer hurt his foot Saturday doing the ku game in East Lansing so there will probably be someone else.

I only point this out because Kansas State's success hinges on its defensive capabilities to get out and pressure the ball. If the officials go into Tuesday's game with the intention of calling it tight then K-State will have an extremlely difficult time winning.

If both teams are allowed to play a physical game then the advantage goes to K-State in my opinion.

Just some useless insight and drivel from my perspective. But it certainly is interesting to me the amount of K-State/ku games John Higgins has done in the past.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2009, 11:16:45 AM by kstatecollegian »

January 11, 2009, 11:09:14 PM
Reply #19

Bennettisgod

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 168
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.

I have self esteem, my entire sense of self worth doesn't revolve around a basketball or football team like most ku fans.

Your entire sense of self worth revolves around ku sports and their fans. There isn't a ku grad or fan alive who knows as much worthless b.s. about ku and its sports programs as you.

January 11, 2009, 11:10:22 PM
Reply #20

Calvin Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 57
The game should be something of a track meet which definitely suits our style more.  Unfortunately they have post players that have a shred of skill, so we'll be f'ed there.  I think we'll play with them to an extent, but never be much of a threat.   I do think we have a pretty decent chance of betting them at home though.

 :powertard:

January 12, 2009, 12:13:28 AM
Reply #21

A-Lishious

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 351
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Puft
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.

I have self esteem, my entire sense of self worth doesn't revolve around a basketball or football team like most ku fans.

Your entire sense of self worth revolves around ku sports and their fans. There isn't a ku grad or fan alive who knows as much worthless b.s. about ku and its sports programs as you.

I would say it, but its more compelling coming from one of your own. Anyways, youre a douche dax.

Game is in the fieldhouse - will be extraordinarily tough for the Kats to win. Gaurd play will be absolutely critical for KSU. They will literally live by the three as I see that being their only viable gameplan. I see alot of "Collins/any gaurd who brings the ball down-pass-to-Aldrich-who-then-scores/is fouled." Should be a destructive outing. I see the game in Bram being much more competitive.

ku - 90

KSU - 66

 :skillz:

January 12, 2009, 12:19:43 AM
Reply #22

SnackPackz

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 274
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.

I have self esteem, my entire sense of self worth doesn't revolve around a basketball or football team like most ku fans.

Your entire sense of self worth revolves around ku sports and their fans. There isn't a ku grad or fan alive who knows as much worthless b.s. about ku and its sports programs as you.

I would say it, but its more compelling coming from one of your own. Anyways, youre a douche dax.

Game is in the fieldhouse - will be extraordinarily tough for the Kats to win. Gaurd play will be absolutely critical for KSU. They will literally live by the three as I see that being their only viable gameplan. I see alot of "Collins/any gaurd who brings the ball down-pass-to-Aldrich-who-then-scores/is fouled." Should be a destructive outing. I see the game in Bram being much more competitive.

ku - 90

KSU - 66

 :skillz:

No way ku gets to 90. No way.

January 12, 2009, 02:52:32 AM
Reply #23

Skydog

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1646
JCCC-L  78

K-State 65



LOL. It's always funny how you go out of your way to talk all kinds of sh*t on ku, then promptly predict them to kick our ass.

I have self esteem, my entire sense of self worth doesn't revolve around a basketball or football team like most ku fans.

Your entire sense of self worth revolves around ku sports and their fans. There isn't a ku grad or fan alive who knows as much worthless b.s. about ku and its sports programs as you.

I would say it, but its more compelling coming from one of your own. Anyways, youre a douche dax.

Game is in the fieldhouse - will be extraordinarily tough for the Kats to win. Gaurd play will be absolutely critical for KSU. They will literally live by the three as I see that being their only viable gameplan. I see alot of "Collins/any gaurd who brings the ball down-pass-to-Aldrich-who-then-scores/is fouled." Should be a destructive outing. I see the game in Bram being much more competitive.

ku - 90

KSU - 66

 :skillz:

 :lol:

January 12, 2009, 06:04:58 AM
Reply #24

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Wow . . . the resident squawktards are  :curse: as per usual.


January 12, 2009, 06:46:34 AM
Reply #25

PowercatPat

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2578
Beakers- 85
Cats- 69

 :flush:

January 12, 2009, 07:36:55 AM
Reply #26

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
Kazzu - 60
Hawks - 70

January 12, 2009, 07:37:44 AM
Reply #27

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
We'll lose by 15 or so  :users:
<---------Click the ball

January 12, 2009, 09:09:07 AM
Reply #28

ltrain37

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 285
  • Personal Text
    ^ Nuff said
Guess I'm more optimistic than most...no Blake Griffen on ku's roster...

'Cats - 56
Hawks - 51
Wondering who is running this hot dog stand and seriously considering heading out for tacos.

January 12, 2009, 09:12:45 AM
Reply #29

mirakulous

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 845
If we held OU to 60, there's no reason we can't do the same to ku.  If we limit turnovers, we've got a chance.

More likely we'll be down by 20 at some point in the game, but hopefully close to within single digits by the end.
COMPLIANCE:  This post is more than "a line or two" and not just a "clever link to right-wing blogs" and, therefore, fully complies with PCR's stringent posting requirements.