Date: 21/08/25 - 12:31 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: So you're GP . . .  (Read 537 times)

October 23, 2008, 12:09:34 PM
Read 537 times

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
you're playing the biggest home game of the year.  The game that outside of @ Utah may be the lynch pin at a fleeting shot at a BCS Bowl game.

You play on a Thursday Night on Versus, in front of 8,000 empty seats.


October 23, 2008, 12:20:07 PM
Reply #1

JR Ewing

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 577
If I'm GP, I'm thinking...



THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME!!!!!11111!!!!!!! a;lkdklajsdfkjaiis;a;  !!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!!   :runaway:  :ksu:
Once you get past the ethics, the rest is easy.

October 23, 2008, 03:45:04 PM
Reply #2

LesMiserables

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 151
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

October 23, 2008, 03:46:41 PM
Reply #3

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
I'm saying to myself. "Man KSU has some great fans, have you seen their message board? I should go there."
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

October 23, 2008, 03:51:10 PM
Reply #4

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

True . . . but at Clemson he would have to have nearly instant success, they've completely run out of patience over there, they don't want an ACC contender, it's not hard to "contend" in the ACC, they want ACC dominance, they want National Titles.  Then after they demand ACC titles and more they demand that you beat the hell out of South Carolina every year.

Washington . . . Patterson just isn't their kind of guy.  He's just not.


October 23, 2008, 04:10:03 PM
Reply #5

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

LOL.  Clemson is in the middle of nowhere, and UW will not be a Pac 10 contender any time soon w/ Tedford and Belotti and Carrol in the conference.  The Big 12N is ridiculously weak.  Heck, I could coach any team in the north to a division title in 2-3 years.

October 23, 2008, 04:18:17 PM
Reply #6

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

LOL.  Clemson is in the middle of nowhere, and UW will not be a Pac 10 contender any time soon w/ Tedford and Belotti and Carrol in the conference.  The Big 12N is ridiculously weak.  Heck, I could coach any team in the north to a division title in 2-3 years.

legit point.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

October 23, 2008, 04:21:57 PM
Reply #7

Bookie Pimp

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1584
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

How do you decide from which screen name to post??

Both of 'em suck... So, it's really just curiosity to be honest.

TIA

 :confused:

October 23, 2008, 04:34:58 PM
Reply #8

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
I'm thinking "I could make Clemson a regular ACC contender starting next year, I could make UW a regular Pac Ten contender in 2-3 years, I couldn't make K-State a regular Big 12 contender EVER.....in fact, I might not make them a consistent 7 win team.....meanwhile, I'd have to listen to my wife bitch about being stuck in Manhattan".

Yeah, UW's conference success is much more impressive than KSU's.

 :yuck:

The North is a road apple waiting for someone to squish it.  Might be the easiest divisions in all of BCS football.