Date: 15/08/25 - 00:24 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: question to resident "nutritioninst"  (Read 1661 times)

June 22, 2008, 07:49:26 PM
Read 1661 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Wouldn't like, 15 apples worth 500 calories have the same effect as 3 tacos (from t-bell) worth 500 calories? (weight/gain/loss)

I mean, isn't calories all that really matters? It's just basic energy laws, no?

It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 22, 2008, 07:52:38 PM
Reply #1

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
Correct (sd is non nutritionist).  Weight gain/loss comes down to calories taken in vs. calories expended.  The only thing that can alter this is the fact that some calories are not fully absorbed because of fiber content.  The apples will have a lot more fiber and they will cause some of the calories to not be absorbed into your system. 
<---------Click the ball

June 22, 2008, 07:54:35 PM
Reply #2

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Quote
some calories are not fully absorbed because of fiber content.  The apples will have a lot more fiber and they will cause some of the calories to not be absorbed into your system.

 :nerd:


Thx tho. Would be nice to take a bio-chem course to learn about all that sh1t (protein, amino acids...ummm..and that other stuff)
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 22, 2008, 08:02:04 PM
Reply #3

Duncan

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 229
  • Personal Text
    i ain't no f*ckin cub
True.

But it is easier to throw down 3 tacos than 15 apples in one sitting. 

June 22, 2008, 08:28:29 PM
Reply #4

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
True.

But it is easier to throw down 3 tacos than 15 apples in one sitting. 

Ya, and delicious'er too.  Who eats apples anyway?  It's like...work. 
<---------Click the ball

June 22, 2008, 08:57:31 PM
Reply #5

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

June 22, 2008, 09:55:45 PM
Reply #6

Dirty Sanchez

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4638
  • Personal Text
    Powertard Un-approved
fruit is for retards

Keep believing that while I go to the future in-laws and pick fresh strawberries, blueberries, raspberries and blackberries all spring and summer long.   :lick:

June 22, 2008, 10:22:43 PM
Reply #7

jeffy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7000
  • Personal Text
    ku Swallows
fruit is for retards

Keep believing that while I go to the future in-laws and pick fresh strawberries, blueberries, raspberries and blackberries all spring and summer long.   :lick:

You suck*

*at least until you bring me a bucket full

June 22, 2008, 10:31:20 PM
Reply #8

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
calories not all that matters really, gotta figure out where the calories come from: protein, fat or carbohydrates.  300 Calories from a nutty bar is worst for you than 300 calories from spinach cause spinach contains complex carbs, and proteins that will make you full longer.

June 22, 2008, 11:07:08 PM
Reply #9

Bullfn33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2152
calories not all that matters really, gotta figure out where the calories come from: protein, fat or carbohydrates.  300 Calories from a nutty bar is worst for you than 300 calories from spinach cause spinach contains complex carbs, and proteins that will make you full longer.

This is pretty good advice.  Calories are overrated.  It's more about where the calories come from and what's(nutrients) in them.  A taco is basically empty carbs, some saturated fat, sodium and some protein; it's a dead food.  An apple is a nutritionally dense live food though it doesn't have any protein.  It will fill you up and suppress your appy.     

Nutrients found in Apple*:
Fiber
Ellagic acid
Bioflavonoids
Pectin
Chlorogenic acid
Caffeic acid
Malic acid
Potassium
Alpha-carotene
Vitamin C
Sulfur
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Iron
Tannins

Notes about Apple*:
Important nutrients are found in the apple skin.
Apples can help suppress the appetite. Apples are antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory.
Apple is a detoxifying fruit.
Show me defense.

June 22, 2008, 11:12:23 PM
Reply #10

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
interesting that 'fatty fat fat' started the thread right after I posted the thread with the fat iraqi kid dancing in it.  coincidence? LOL I think not!


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

June 23, 2008, 07:15:50 AM
Reply #11

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
This is pretty good advice.  Calories are overrated.  It's more about where the calories come from and what's(nutrients) in them.    

This is BS.  The question was in regards to weight gain/loss only.  When you start throwing in other nutritional factors of course the crapty tasting thing is going to be better for you.  But, weight gain and loss comes down to calories taken in v. calories burned exclusively.  Of course the apple is going to make you feel better and want to burn more calories but that is irrelevant to the question.
<---------Click the ball

June 23, 2008, 07:45:20 AM
Reply #12

cyclist

  • Classless Cat
  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 11257
  • Personal Text
    King of the Mountains

Notes about Apple*:
Important nutrients are found in the apple skin.
Apples can help suppress the appetite. Apples are antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory.
Apple is a detoxifying fruit.

An apple a day keeps the doctor away...

:cyclist: :cyclist: :cyclist: :cyclist:
I love the smell of peat in the evening.  That smell, you know that earthy smell...  Smells like...whisky !



Funditus Classless

June 23, 2008, 07:57:06 AM
Reply #13

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
This is pretty good advice.  Calories are overrated.  It's more about where the calories come from and what's(nutrients) in them.    

This is BS.  The question was in regards to weight gain/loss only.  When you start throwing in other nutritional factors of course the crapty tasting thing is going to be better for you.  But, weight gain and loss comes down to calories taken in v. calories burned exclusively.  Of course the apple is going to make you feel better and want to burn more calories but that is irrelevant to the question.
I don't think it's really irrelevant.  Try eating 1800 calories a day of only twinkies and see what happens to your body. 

June 23, 2008, 08:06:47 AM
Reply #14

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
This is pretty good advice.  Calories are overrated.  It's more about where the calories come from and what's(nutrients) in them.    

This is BS.  The question was in regards to weight gain/loss only.  When you start throwing in other nutritional factors of course the crapty tasting thing is going to be better for you.  But, weight gain and loss comes down to calories taken in v. calories burned exclusively.  Of course the apple is going to make you feel better and want to burn more calories but that is irrelevant to the question.
I don't think it's really irrelevant.  Try eating 1800 calories a day of only twinkies and see what happens to your body. 

As long as you are burning the same calories you will not gain weight.  Now, your teeth may fall out, you may not want to do as much exercise (hence causing weight gain), you will get scurvy, you will feel crapty all the time...but your weight will be the same all things being equal.
<---------Click the ball

June 23, 2008, 08:08:25 AM
Reply #15

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Horsesh1t.

I eat an apple and it doesn't do sh1t. It doesn't suppress any appetite. I eat a taco? You actually feel like you ate something.

assholes.

I think Saulbadguy (ksufans.com poster) is mixing up health and weight gain/loss. JMO.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 23, 2008, 08:09:00 AM
Reply #16

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I think Saulbadguy (ksufans.com poster) is mixing up health and weight gain/loss. JMO.

exac
<---------Click the ball

June 23, 2008, 08:21:13 AM
Reply #17

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
This is pretty good advice.  Calories are overrated.  It's more about where the calories come from and what's(nutrients) in them.    

This is BS.  The question was in regards to weight gain/loss only.  When you start throwing in other nutritional factors of course the crapty tasting thing is going to be better for you.  But, weight gain and loss comes down to calories taken in v. calories burned exclusively.  Of course the apple is going to make you feel better and want to burn more calories but that is irrelevant to the question.
I don't think it's really irrelevant.  Try eating 1800 calories a day of only twinkies and see what happens to your body. 

As long as you are burning the same calories you will not gain weight.  Now, your teeth may fall out, you may not want to do as much exercise (hence causing weight gain), you will get scurvy, you will feel crapty all the time...but your weight will be the same all things being equal.
You'll lose muscle mass.   :tongue:

June 23, 2008, 08:21:56 AM
Reply #18

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
Horsesh1t.

I eat an apple and it doesn't do sh1t. It doesn't suppress any appetite. I eat a taco? You actually feel like you ate something.

assholes.

I think Saulbadguy (ksufans.com poster) is mixing up health and weight gain/loss. JMO.
You eat 1 taco bell taco?  That's like nothing.

June 23, 2008, 08:26:45 AM
Reply #19

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
No, I'm just saying. 3 gets the job done, 4 pref.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 23, 2008, 08:33:16 AM
Reply #20

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
wh0 the heck eatz tac0 b3lL anyW@yz???  esp. duriNg KK challenege.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

June 23, 2008, 08:44:13 AM
Reply #21

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
No, I'm just saying. 3 gets the job done, 4 pref.
4 is around 800 calories.  1 apple is around 100.

June 23, 2008, 08:48:34 AM
Reply #22

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
No, I'm just saying. 3 gets the job done, 4 pref.
4 is around 800 calories.  1 apple is around 100.

taco = delicious
apple = disgusting

not even a contest imo
<---------Click the ball

June 23, 2008, 08:55:22 AM
Reply #23

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
No, I'm just saying. 3 gets the job done, 4 pref.
4 is around 800 calories.  1 apple is around 100.

taco = delicious
apple = disgusting

not even a contest imo
THINK YOU ARE CONFUSING TASTE W/ WEIGHT LOSS!!!  :lol:

June 23, 2008, 08:57:39 AM
Reply #24

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
No, I'm just saying. 3 gets the job done, 4 pref.
4 is around 800 calories.  1 apple is around 100.

taco = delicious
apple = disgusting

not even a contest imo
THINK YOU ARE CONFUSING TASTE W/ WEIGHT LOSS!!!  :lol:

Destroyed....that's what my argument just got  :-[
<---------Click the ball

February 28, 2009, 06:33:01 AM
Reply #25

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
http://health.yahoo.com/news/afp/healthobesity_20090226164329.html


Quote
Eating heart-healthy, low-calorie foods and exercising is the key to losing weight regardless of levels of protein, fat or carbohydrates, a new study has found.

 :thumbsup:
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

February 28, 2009, 06:58:29 AM
Reply #26

ksudrew

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 471
fruit is for retards

Keep believing that while I go to the future in-laws and pick a cherry fresh strawberries, blueberries, raspberries and blackberries all spring and summer long.   :lick:

umk


February 28, 2009, 07:39:10 AM
Reply #27

Fledermaus

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 395

At a general level, calories are equivalent.  Calories are a measure of heat when the food is completely burned in lab.  The body does not process all foods equally.  Cells prefer to burn glucose (sugar) & carbohydrates first, and will store fats for use later (if glucose levels are sufficient).  Apples are higher in sugars and will tend to be used as an immediate energy source.  Tacos, being higher in fats, will tend to be stored as fat.  Foods also have different tendencies to change blood sugar levels (glycemic index) which affects whether they will be burned or stored. 

But as long as your caloric intake of any type of food is less than your caloric expendature, no problem.  Difference between sources of calories is not great enough to worry about for most people.  It's the fouth taco that is the problem.

February 28, 2009, 02:01:04 PM
Reply #28

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
http://www.jissn.com/content/1/2/21

Quote
Young et al. compared 3 isoenergetic (1,800 kcal/day) and isoprotein (115 g/day) diets differing in carbohydrate content (30, 60, and 104 g/day) [22]. After 9 weeks on the 30-g, 60-g, and 104-g carbohydrate diets, weight loss was 16.2, 12.8, and 11.9 kilograms and fat accounted for 95%, 84%, and 75% of the weight loss, respectively.

[22] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5548734?dopt=Abstract&holding=f1000,f1000m,isrctn

That's pretty dated though, anyone have any more recent references to similar isocaloric studies? 
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

February 28, 2009, 02:02:51 PM
Reply #29

Thin Blue Line

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4166
You all seem to forget that eating 15 apples, instead of 3 tacos, could very well result in rapid weight loss. If you've ever eaten more that a couple of apples at a sitting, you'll know of what I speak:



 :fullofit: