Date: 18/08/25 - 04:08 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Biggest surprise?  (Read 628 times)

September 02, 2007, 12:24:42 AM
Read 628 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

September 02, 2007, 12:25:26 AM
Reply #1

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
I say the pass pro for the first 3 Q's.

September 02, 2007, 12:26:53 AM
Reply #2

DS43

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 109
Tyler Hansbrough's dad refs SEC football.  A poor one at that too.
Recruiting is just a big tease.

September 02, 2007, 12:27:39 AM
Reply #3

acceleration_man

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 564
  • Personal Text
    Tearin' it up on the Next Level!
    • FinesseFX
Rush D.

It was back in FORCE tonight. Who'd have thought our secondary would be spottier than our line? Excellent job... by the end of the year, the lynch mob might just be back.

Also, somewhat happily surprised with O-line play. It again, was spotty, but overall I think much improved. We have to remember this was the 1st game. Until the last 4 mins, Josh was upright.

September 02, 2007, 12:28:32 AM
Reply #4

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
I honestly thought the rush d would be like the rutgers game.

They were unreal. We were just owning them.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

September 02, 2007, 12:29:06 AM
Reply #5

WildWillie21

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 765
The new uni's.

For real, though, the right 4 of the oline.

Also no surprise, but not much praise for Ian Campbell so far, but he had a hell of a game. He didn't make a lot of tackles per say, but he disrupted a hell of a lot of plays. I think he's gonna f*ck some people up in conf. play.  :ksu:

September 02, 2007, 12:31:25 AM
Reply #6

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
I honestly thought the rush d would be like the rutgers game.

They were unreal. We were just owning them.

This is true.  I'd kind of forgotten what it was like against Rutgers.

I just wish the Big XII was still a running league.   F-ing spread offenses.  :frown:

September 02, 2007, 12:34:53 AM
Reply #7

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
The 3-4 was designed to combat those spread offenses, no?

So the fact that we completely blew up AU's run game with it should be considered a huge bonus.

September 02, 2007, 12:39:20 AM
Reply #8

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I honestly thought the rush d would be like the rutgers game.

They were unreal. We were just owning them.

This is true.  I'd kind of forgotten what it was like against Rutgers.

I just wish the Big XII was still a running league.   F-ing spread offenses.  :frown:

Well, more linebackers = more speed, I guess.

September 02, 2007, 12:42:53 AM
Reply #9

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
Overall team speed.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

September 02, 2007, 12:43:03 AM
Reply #10

cireksu

  • Guest
we had more speed on the outside of our D than I expected, we were flowing to the ball wonderfully.  Murphy looks like a player as well.

September 02, 2007, 12:43:29 AM
Reply #11

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
I honestly thought the rush d would be like the rutgers game.

They were unreal. We were just owning them.

This is true.  I'd kind of forgotten what it was like against Rutgers.

I just wish the Big XII was still a running league.   F-ing spread offenses.  :frown:

Well, more linebackers = more speed, I guess.

The key to stopping the spread is:

a) speed, and
b) d-line pressure

so this may translate into success against that, as well.  We're going to see what, five or six spread offenses in conference play?

September 02, 2007, 12:43:53 AM
Reply #12

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
That aurbun won despite us leading mst f the ganm.

September 02, 2007, 01:11:06 AM
Reply #13

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
That aurbun won despite us leading mst f the ganm.


That wasn't surprising at all. Quite expected, actually.

September 02, 2007, 01:12:13 AM
Reply #14

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
ti uwas sururpising we wrew wining at all.

September 02, 2007, 01:19:22 AM
Reply #15

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189
I say the pass pro for the first 3 Q's.

yep.

D was crazy sh**.

Amazing. 

September 02, 2007, 01:51:21 PM
Reply #16

McGrowlTowelZac

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4123
  • Personal Text
    This ZERO is my Hero
Chandler looked good, like he is gonna a real good one at KSU.

Childs looked good as well.

Manu was in on some plays, thats promising.

A. Moore, obviously, though he missed that safety.

Marcus Perry...why was he on the field?

September 02, 2007, 02:22:21 PM
Reply #17

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
The only thing that blatantly sucked was all of the penalties. Everything else looked good for the most part. Our secondary wasn't great at times but was decent for the most part. Alesana played well for most of the game and just fell off a cliff in the fourth quarter. He was blocking real well for awhile and threw some great downfield blocks. I'm just excited that the season has started.