We are seriously going to be Baylor in a few years

[mjrod]

tcu ... #72 recruiting class in 2002, was that tcu I saw beating the dog meat out of OU in Owen Field??

Bomar fell down again. 5 star.. tee hee..

[sonofdaxjones]

tcu ... #72 recruiting class in 2002, was that tcu I saw beating the dog meat out of OU in Owen Field??

Bomar fell down again. 5 star.. tee hee..

Utah ... #77 Recruiting class in 2002 ... that really worked out poorly for Urban Meyer.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

So theres no difference between a 1-star and a 5-star?

Depends on the coach.

So you really think that Prince, a guy who has never been a head coach ever before, just walked into the Big 12 with a completely different recruiting philosophy than the rest of the entire Big 12 and will take his single offer players all the way to the big 12 championship?

You're not concerned about how recruiting is going so far at all?

[sonofdaxjones]

tcu ... #72 recruiting class in 2002, was that tcu I saw beating the dog meat out of OU in Owen Field??

Bomar fell down again. 5 star.. tee hee..

Yep ... another Bomar Sack ... by the #79 recruiting class, agaist the #4 recruiting class.

Viriginia Tech ... #45 Recruiting class in 2002.

[sonofdaxjones]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

So theres no difference between a 1-star and a 5-star?

Depends on the coach.

So you really think that Prince, a guy who has never been a head coach ever before, just walked into the Big 12 with a completely different recruiting philosophy than the rest of the entire Big 12 and will take his single offer players all the way to the big 12 championship?

You're not concerned about how recruiting is going so far at all?

Who the F decided it was a completely different recruiting philosophy??

Squawks??

[sonofdaxjones]

NC State #7 Recruiting Class in 2003 ... Middle of the Pack ACC team ever since.

[sonofdaxjones]

NC State #7 Recruiting Class in 2003 ... Middle of the Pack ACC team ever since.

North Carolina #13 Recruiting Class in 2003 .... lower tier ACC team ever since.

[sonofdaxjones]

Stanford ... #25 Recruiting Class in 2003 ... they suck.

Oklahoma State #15 Recruiting Class in 2003.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

So theres no difference between a 1-star and a 5-star?

Depends on the coach.

So you really think that Prince, a guy who has never been a head coach ever before, just walked into the Big 12 with a completely different recruiting philosophy than the rest of the entire Big 12 and will take his single offer players all the way to the big 12 championship?

You're not concerned about how recruiting is going so far at all?

Who the F decided it was a completely different recruiting philosophy??

Squawks??

Do you see anyone else with 13 commits from recruits that have only your offer to consider? They obviously don't think other offers are coming if they are so quick to commit to Kstate.

No one else is grabbing up filler scholarships already.

Maybe Prince will pull some scholarships out from under people later.

[fatty fat fat]

EDIT..FLordia doesn't have one.

9-1.

[mjrod]

OMG.

So now it's BCS appearances?

Geezus..

[fatty fat fat]

Yea, a team that goes to a BCS bowl usually has more success than a team that doesn't.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

If Nu, or ku, or any other Big 12 team were recruiting this way with a first year coach you'd be all over them.

[fatty fat fat]

If Nu, or ku, or any other Big 12 team were recruiting this way with a first year coach you'd be all over them.

Dax was absolutely wailing on ku last year, when your 1st 10 recruits had no offers.

[mjrod]

Yea, a team that goes to a BCS bowl usually has more success than a team that doesn't.

Your correlation discounts coaching of teams.  Penn State JUST got into a BCS bowl, and they haven't had bad recruiting classes.

Auburn almost fired their coach and they've been to one BCS bowl game.

Notre Dame JUST GOT to a BCS bowl because of the BCS rules.

Florida State barely wins their conference and has a worse record (see KSU over OU)

The correlation between recruiting and BCS appearances, or teams that do well doesn't hold up because you keep changing the parameters.  A team that does relatively well can do so for many factors, and recruiting is one of them, NOT THE primary or the MAJORITY reason.

This is what you do not get.  You cannot at all say that great recruiting classes = success because there are just as many examples of it going the other way than just one recruiting class.

[fatty fat fat]

You can't spin 9 bids vs 1 bid.

[mjrod]

You can't spin 9 bids vs 1 bid.

You can't make unequivocally, and without defense, the correlation you are on one recruiting class.

[fatty fat fat]

I just did.

9 bids vs 1.


Statisitcally impossible for that to be a "fluke"

[mjrod]

I just did.

9 bids vs 1.


Statisitcally impossible for that to be a "fluke"

if it was just one season of recruits.. yes.  Over the course of say... the last 10 years.. keep at it junior.

[fatty fat fat]

So you're saying I just got lucky? That in any other year the teams ranked 40-50 have more BCS bids than those in the top ten?


LOL.

[mjrod]

So you're saying I just got lucky? That in any other year the teams ranked 40-50 have more BCS bids than those in the top ten?


LOL.

No, I'm not saying that all.

What I'm saying is that you narrowed your year to fit your argument, not going back enough years to establish a trend that supports your theory.   You just happened to use on that supported it.

So get back to work junior.

[fatty fat fat]

EDIT..FLordia doesn't have one.

9-1.

TTT

[mjrod]

That was extremely weak fatty.   Your math professors are shaking their heads right now.

[fatty fat fat]

You so want to become friends with me.

LOL

[mjrod]

You so want to become friends with me.

LOL

Nice deflection and tapout.

No way.  I don't become friends with high school tennis players who aren't first string.

 

[fatty fat fat]

mj is stange

[sonofdaxjones]

If Nu, or ku, or any other Big 12 team were recruiting this way with a first year coach you'd be all over them.

Dax was absolutely wailing on ku last year, when your 1st 10 recruits had no offers.

Bullcrap.

[sonofdaxjones]

So now if KSU doesn't have a Top 10 recruiting class, then it sucks??

Well, good luck in NEVER being happy.

[fatty fat fat]

If Nu, or ku, or any other Big 12 team were recruiting this way with a first year coach you'd be all over them.

Dax was absolutely wailing on ku last year, when your 1st 10 recruits had no offers.

BullS**T.

LOL. You were giving them crap.

now you look dumb.

[fatty fat fat]

So now if KSU doesn't have a Top 10 recruiting class, then it sucks??

Well, good luck in NEVER being happy.

Bob f-ing Huggins