We are seriously going to be Baylor in a few years

[sonofdaxjones]

Again, we'll see when the stars come out how truthfull these recruits are being.

Fatty reaffirms that Jeremy Crabtree knows more then the KSU coaching staff.

Jeremy Crabtee former KC Star Reporter, Rivals recruiting "expert", years coaching football ... NONE.

[fatty fat fat]

They've been proven to show excellent correlations between recruiting success and on the field success.

Why can't this register with you?

[Fausto]

"There is NOTHING to indicate that."

"Again, we'll see when the stars come out how truthfull these recruits are being."

So, which is it?  Are you going to wait and see, in indict right now.  Your reasoning is not consistent.

[fatty fat fat]

I'm predicting when the stars come out, our class will be an utter embarrassment.

[Fausto]

Weiser was such an idiot.  Why didn't he hire Crabtree?

[sonofdaxjones]

Colorado had the Top 10 class in 2002.  Wow, they've really been huge on the national scene haven't they??

Arizona State had the #18 class in 2002 ... and Dirk Koetter clings to his job ... barely.

Arizona had the #25 Class in 2002 ... John Mackovic ... fired 2 years later.

Texas A&M had the #23 Class in 2002 .... oh boy, they've been awesome havn't they??

Miss. State has the #17 Class in 2002 ... Jackie Sherrill forced to resign 2 years later.

KSU #14 class in 2002 ... 2004 last place Big 12 North, 2005 Last place Big 12 North.

[fatty fat fat]

Colorado had the Top 10 class in 2002.  Wow, they've really been huge on the national scene haven't they??

Arizona State had the #18 class in 2002 ... and Dirk Koetter clings to his job ... barely.

Arizona had the #25 Class in 2002 ... John Mackovic ... fired 2 years later.

Texas A&M had the #23 Class in 2002 .... oh boy, they've been awesome havn't they??

Miss. State has the #17 Class in 2002 ... Jackie Sherrill forced to resign 2 years later.

Jesus, are you trying to argue that recruiting rankings simply don't matter?

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

Its settled then... the higher ranking of your commits, the more likely your team is to suck.

[sonofdaxjones]

Colorado had the Top 10 class in 2002.  Wow, they've really been huge on the national scene haven't they??

Arizona State had the #18 class in 2002 ... and Dirk Koetter clings to his job ... barely.

Arizona had the #25 Class in 2002 ... John Mackovic ... fired 2 years later.

Texas A&M had the #23 Class in 2002 .... oh boy, they've been awesome havn't they??

Miss. State has the #17 Class in 2002 ... Jackie Sherrill forced to resign 2 years later.

Jesus, are you trying to argue that recruiting rankings simply don't matter?

Look I added KSU ... #14 in 2002 Fatty, how's that worked out so far??

You argue that's all that matters ... the rankings aren't even out on these kids, it's 9 months until Febuary 2007 and you've already determined KSU's recruiting class sucks.

[sonofdaxjones]

Its settled then... the higher ranking of your commits, the more likely your team is to suck.

That's not what I am saying ... and dear god please don't tell ANYONE you go to KSU ... no one.

[WilliamTheWildcat]

This is a really spirited thread.  It's got great points on both sides.  

On a side note, I just today noticed the "news box" at the top of the page.  Funny stuff.

[sonofdaxjones]

Washington #19 recruiting class in 2002 ... they suck!!

[fatty fat fat]

What part of "FOR THE MOST PART" recruiting rankings are a good indicator of future success did you miss?

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

Its settled then... the higher ranking of your commits, the more likely your team is to suck.

That's not what I am saying ... and dear god please don't tell ANYONE you go to KSU ... no one.

That appears to be the common theme from you and Rodless so far.

[sonofdaxjones]

D'Brickashaw Ferguson --- 2 D1 offers, #4 in the NFL draft in 2006.

[fatty fat fat]

What part of "FOR THE MOST PART" recruiting rankings are a good indicator of future success did you miss?

[sonofdaxjones]

Its settled then... the higher ranking of your commits, the more likely your team is to suck.

That's not what I am saying ... and dear god please don't tell ANYONE you go to KSU ... no one.

That appears to be the common theme from you and Rodless so far.

You are the quitisential dumbass.

[sonofdaxjones]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

[mjrod]

What part of "FOR THE MOST PART" recruiting rankings are a good indicator of future success did you miss?

You meant to say "generally"

For the most part doesn't support your argument.

[sonofdaxjones]

West Virginia ... #37 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... I think they just scored another TD on Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.

Texas Tech ... #47 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... yeah, they just  scored another TD on the #14 recruiting class in 2002, good old KSU.

[fatty fat fat]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

[mjrod]

Its settled then... the higher ranking of your commits, the more likely your team is to suck.

That's not what I am saying ... and dear god please don't tell ANYONE you go to KSU ... no one.

That appears to be the common theme from you and Rodless so far.

You made that up.  That was pretty clever.  Too bad that's not what we're saying.

[mjrod]

West Virginia ... #37 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... I think they just scored another TD on Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.

Texas Tech ... #47 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... yeah, they just  scored another TD on the #14 recruiting class in 2002, good old KSU.

Georgia was ranked in the Top 10 weren't they?

[mjrod]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

[sonofdaxjones]

West Virginia ... #37 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... I think they just scored another TD on Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.

Texas Tech ... #47 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... yeah, they just  scored another TD on the #14 recruiting class in 2002, good old KSU.

Georgia was ranked in the Top 10 weren't they?

Yep.

Plus when have I said stars don't matter, when you find the "star" rankings of our current commits you let us know, there are NONE right now fatty ... NONE!!

[mjrod]

West Virginia ... #37 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... I think they just scored another TD on Georgia in the Sugar Bowl.

Texas Tech ... #47 Recruiting Class in 2002 ... yeah, they just  scored another TD on the #14 recruiting class in 2002, good old KSU.

Georgia was ranked in the Top 10 weren't they?

Yep.

Plus when have I said stars don't matter, when you find the "star" rankings of our current commits you let us know, there are NONE right now fatty ... NONE!!

Oops.. West Virginia just scored again.

[GoldbrickGangBoss]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

So theres no difference between a 1-star and a 5-star?

[sonofdaxjones]

Fresno State .... #53 recruiting class in 2002, are they done Ass Raping KSU yet??

[mjrod]

What part of:

It's 9 months until Febuary 2007 do you not understand Fatty??

I do understand that. It's a decent point. I'm saying I doubt these guys will be ranked very high.

Please PLEASE stop trying to make the "stars don't matter" argument. It's retarded.

STARS DO NOT MATTER EXCEPT TO PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT STARS.

So theres no difference between a 1-star and a 5-star?

Depends on the coach.

[sonofdaxjones]

tcu ... #72 recruiting class in 2002, was that tcu I saw beating the dog meat out of OU in Owen Field??