NCAA 08 Ratings

[RegWalker53]

                   ovr off def spt
Kansas State 80 85 77 61

Kansas 76 78 73 67

The Link dosent have all the schools on there but it has most of them

http://boards.ign.com/ncaa_football_ea/b6051/143479843/p1/?93

[FBWillie]

Damn... they have our special teams set pretty crappy....

[RegWalker53]

everyone's special teams are terrible

[kstate16]

that's pretty off. if anything, i think our defense and ST will be our strengths. who knows...

[FBWillie]

They're probably looking at the amount of returning starters.... outside of Yamon... who did we lose on o? 

[asava]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

[cas]

Wow. Check out OK. State, with those ratings they should be Top 10.

[goCATSgo]

we have the same ovr rating as DukE, bullcrap

[WorldWideBalla21]

Yeah those ratings are pretty accurate, Lousiana Tech is definately better than us.......and if we played Duke it would be tossup same w/ UNC..................

[Bullfn33]

Am I missing something?

ISU 89?  same as Florida?

Colorado 87?

lots of others seem off. this can't be right.

[doom]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

Are you kidding?

[RegWalker53]

Am I missing something?

ISU 89?  same as Florida?

Colorado 87?

lots of others seem off. this can't be right.

if you would read farther down it would explain that the ISU is Iowa instead

[Bullfn33]

Am I missing something?

ISU 89?  same as Florida?

Colorado 87?

lots of others seem off. this can't be right.

if you would read farther down it would explain that the ISU is Iowa instead

So Iowa is going to be as good as Florida.  YFR

[dr00d]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

Are you kidding?

I'm sure that was a joke.

[doom]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

Are you kidding?

I'm sure that was a joke.

Oh thank goodness.

[QuinnMac]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

Are you kidding?

I'm sure that was a joke.

Oh thank goodness.

[asava]

we obviously lost our best back, tommy guns. that is an obvious blow to our running game.

Are you kidding?

I'm sure that was a joke.

Oh thank goodness.

i don't know what you guys are talking about. t-gun just couldn't get any respect from prince. i don't see why we wouldn't play a guy with arms the size of my head and a toughness rating that is equal to my 9 year old cousin. yes i was joking.

[RegWalker53]

Am I missing something?

ISU 89?  same as Florida?

Colorado 87?

lots of others seem off. this can't be right.

if you would read farther down it would explain that the ISU is Iowa instead

So Iowa is going to be as good as Florida.  YFR

i didnt f'n rate the teams ea sports did go bitch about it 2 them

[WorldWideBalla21]

these ratings are way off. They have K-State as one of the worst BCS schools, and some of the schools have way too high rankings..............OKSTATE?, Colorado, Lousiana Tech???

[FBWillie]

1. Who cares... It's a game.  Has no effect on our team, nor does it give an indicator of national perception.  To me, it looks like they watched the texas game, made the rankings based off that performance, than made subtractions based off seniors leaving.
2.  It doesn't even come out for a month or so... are these rankings even final?

[chum1]

It's about respect.  Maybe they would have taken KSU more seriously had we hired Oppenheimer.  We'll never know.