I know I would hate it if such a lowly recruited kids w/ offers from Tennessee and Georgetown contributed like this highly ranked recruit as a freshman...http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=31816 ...not that WJ had a beasley, Walker, etc.
These 150+ recruits are never factors.

Heres' a post-final multiple choice...This question is predicated on the 'fact' that GMcDermott/MAnderson/etc would be considered better hires than FMartin (or at least not question regarding experience),
So, if we beat the the likes of them, again, and end up in the top 3 of the B12 is it because:
a- we have talent at the expense of poor coaching?
b- we have mediocre talent and a better than average coach?
c- we have less than average talent and a great coach?