Date: 15/08/25 - 14:11 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: "Wooly-esque" Jamar Samuels..  (Read 696 times)

May 09, 2007, 08:30:55 PM
Read 696 times

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572
I know I would hate it if such a lowly recruited kids w/ offers from Tennessee and Georgetown contributed like this highly ranked recruit as a freshman...http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=31816 ...not that WJ had a beasley, Walker, etc.

These 150+ recruits are never factors.

:violin:

May 09, 2007, 08:40:50 PM
Reply #1

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Damn, they must have finally updated his profile or something.  Only remembered George Mason.  It's nice to see Georgetown on his offer list.  I wonder if they saw something in him. ;)

May 09, 2007, 08:48:12 PM
Reply #2

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572
not even ranked amongst power forwards.. http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=23249

Seton Hall and KSU for '07..guess they were the only ones that knew.  Tenn and G'Town for '08.  JTIII and Pearl don't know talent.  Shoot, Gillispie doesn't know talent either which is why V-Dub will fizzle.


May 09, 2007, 09:01:40 PM
Reply #3

yosh

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3071
What a completely awful thread on so many levels.
Cada hombre un gato salvaje!

May 09, 2007, 09:07:45 PM
Reply #4

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572
Quote
What a completely awful thread on so many levels.

I agree.  The thread of doom.


May 09, 2007, 09:16:23 PM
Reply #5

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
What a completely awful thread on so many levels.

Mods ban plz.

May 09, 2007, 09:32:30 PM
Reply #6

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
Samuels appears to be MUCH more developed.

May 09, 2007, 09:57:33 PM
Reply #7

yosh

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3071
Cada hombre un gato salvaje!

May 09, 2007, 09:58:15 PM
Reply #8

FHSU92

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2625
I know I would hate it if such a lowly recruited kids w/ offers from Tennessee and Georgetown contributed like this highly ranked recruit as a freshman...http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=31816 ...not that WJ had a beasley, Walker, etc.

These 150+ recruits are never factors.

:violin:
Heres' a post-final multiple choice...This question is predicated on the 'fact' that GMcDermott/MAnderson/etc would be considered better hires than FMartin (or at least not question regarding experience),

So, if we beat the the likes of them, again, and end up in the top 3 of the B12 is it because:
a- we have talent at the expense of poor coaching?
b- we have mediocre talent and a better than average coach?
c- we have less than average talent and a great coach?

May 09, 2007, 10:04:07 PM
Reply #9

StayOutOfTrees

  • Guest
Please Manhatter,

Jamar Samuels will be a factor this year in support and in the future he will a major contributer at K-State.

You could have picked another recruit to talk about, but Jamar will be a consistent player at KSU in the upcoming years.

Such a clueless post, it almost wants to make one wanna puke.  :yuck:
« Last Edit: May 09, 2007, 10:12:09 PM by StayOutOfTrees »

May 10, 2007, 01:52:19 AM
Reply #10

ChicagoCat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1773
I know I would hate it if such a lowly recruited kids w/ offers from Tennessee and Georgetown contributed like this highly ranked recruit as a freshman...http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=31816 ...not that WJ had a beasley, Walker, etc.

These 150+ recruits are never factors.

:violin:
Heres' a post-final multiple choice...This question is predicated on the 'fact' that GMcDermott/MAnderson/etc would be considered better hires than FMartin (or at least not question regarding experience),

So, if we beat the the likes of them, again, and end up in the top 3 of the B12 is it because:
a- we have talent at the expense of poor coaching?
b- we have mediocre talent and a better than average coach?
c- we have less than average talent and a great coach?


I think it is an average coach with amazing talent next year.  It will be a big shift since last year we had the exact opposite.  No offense to Frank, but he is not going to be an amazing coach in his first year.  He will make mistakes and thats ok, he has the talent on the team to overcome.  I'm hoping with these players he sets a high bar and finds losing in any situation completely unacceptable which I think is very important in his first year.  It would be a nice change from Wooly's moral victory era.