KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: WildCatzPhreak on September 02, 2007, 02:30:53 AM
-
North
Nebraska
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State
South
Oklahoma
Texas A&M
Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Discuss.
-
Tech hasn't played its first game.
-
ksu needs to be at the bottom with the other loser, isu
-
NORTH
Nebraska
K-State
Kansas
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State
SOUTH
OU
Texas
A&M
Tech
OSU
Baylor
-
North
Kansas State
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Kansas
Iowa State
South
Oklahoma
Texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Baylor
-
North
Nebraska
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State
South
Oklahoma
Texas A&M
Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Discuss.
Too early to say anything. Iowa State is clearly at the bottom and who knows on the rest. With the exception of ISU the North did well this week.
-
Standings at the end:
North
Nebraska
K-State
Missouri
Colorado
ku
ISU
(I think that MU, CU, and ku could all really be interchangeable)
South
Oklahoma
Texas
A&M
Okie State
Tech
Baylor
-
Standings at the end:
North
Nebraska
K-State
Missouri
Colorado
ku
ISU
(I think that MU, CU, and ku could all really be interchangeable)
South
Oklahoma
Texas
A&M
Okie State
Tech
Baylor
That looks about right.... for now.
-
I think that KSU has an argument for 1st in the north along with NU. MU looked scared and CU looked almost beat. ku played my Hellen Keller's all-girl catholic high school for the blind, so I can't say whether or not they can do much... ISU needs help.
I feel like my life is normal again now that College Football is here! GO 'CATS :ksu:
-
North
Group 1: NU, KSU
Group 2: MU
Group 3: ku, CU
Group 7: ISU
South
Group 1: OU
Group 2: UT, ATM
Group 3: OSU
Group 4: BU
TBD: Tech
-
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game. That's not a cupcake.
ku dominated that game, 52-7. You a-holes can doubt us all you want. It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.
Here's how the Big 12 rankings should look:
North:
NU
ku
MU
KSU
CU
ISU
South:
OU
A&M
UT
OSU
Tech
Baylor
-
I think it's too early to rank them. Nevada wasn't as good as last year, so we don't know very much about our team. Wake Forest will tell us a lot more.
What last night did tell me though is that you guys have a pretty good coach and we might be in for a tough game against you. I know you're probably crushed still this morning, but you should hold your heads high. You went into an incredibly tough atmosphere and outplayed a ranked team. I think that if Prince's recruits turn out he possibly could get you back to where you were with Snyder.
-
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game. That's not a cupcake.
ku dominated that game, 52-7. You a-holes can doubt us all you want. It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.
:loly:
How much money are you willing to lay down on that?
-
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game. That's not a cupcake.
ku dominated that game, 52-7. You a-holes can doubt us all you want. It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.
:loly:
How much money are you willing to lay down on that?
12-26-2006 Middle Tennessee State Mid Major N 31 14 W
11-30-2006 Ohio Mid Major N 31 10 W
11-24-2006 Buffalo Mid Major A 55 28 W
11-17-2006 Northern Illinois Mid Major A 10 31 L
11-10-2006 Western Michigan Mid Major H 31 7 W
11-04-2006 Temple Mid Major A 42 26 W
10-19-2006 Bowling Green Mid Major H 31 14 W
10-14-2006 Ball State Mid Major H 18 7 W
10-07-2006 Toledo Mid Major A 42 20 W
09-30-2006 Kentucky BCS A 36 45 L
09-23-2006 Eastern Michigan Mid Major A 24 17 W
09-16-2006 Akron Mid Major H 24 21 W
09-09-2006 Michigan (#9) BCS A 17 41 L
08-31-2006 Boston College (#20) BCS H 24 31 L
10-4 with losses to Kentucky and Northern Illionois. Zero wins over BCS teams. A bowl game win over Middle Tennessee State. And you gave up 300 yards to them. At home. Yeah, you guys really played a tough team yesterday.
-
auburn will finish the season out of the top 25. their offense is putrid and their defense is just average, maybe a bit better than average.
-
auburn will finish the season out of the top 25. their offense is putrid and their defense is just average, maybe a bit better than average.
I love how, when they beat you, they are awesome. But when we barely lose to them, they suck. How's those sour grapes taste, douch bag?
-
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game. That's not a cupcake.
Central Michigan also has a new coach and is running a different system than the previous year. They have a good group but it was not dominating until the end of last year. C. Michigan may be no better than Colorado was last year.
Try and keep up with your opponents. It must suck that you don't even know what you're opponent's histories are much less your own team.
-
North
Kansas State OR Mizzou
Kansas
Nebraska
Colorado
Iowa State
South
Oklahoma
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor
-
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game. That's not a cupcake.
ku dominated that game, 52-7. You a-holes can doubt us all you want. It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.
Here's how the Big 12 rankings should look:
North:
NU
ku
MU
KSU
CU
ISU
South:
OU
A&M
UT
OSU
Tech
Baylor
ku has a history of really playing well in Manhattan....
The touchdown scored in 1997 has me pretty nervous about the game....
For what it's worth, the Big 12 North based on the results of the first weekend did have some shuffling:
My North picks before the season:
1. MU
2. NU
3. KSU
4. ku
5. CU
6. ISU
After one game:
1. NU- Old style Huskers, great run game and crappy air game
2. KSU- Impressive at Auburn....Easily our best run defense we have had since the 2003 season....
3. MU- Same old Pinkel (2 point gamble almost lost the game) and MU defense barely held off Illini backup QB....
4. CU- Buffs are much improved and they have the chickens in Boulder (ku is awesome on the road)
5. ku- Impossible to judge against a total creampuff opponent....Should win 6 with both Baylor and ISU in weed town
6. ISU- Lose to Northern Iowa and 0-12 is reality
-
our air game is far from crappy. We had a qb shaking off some rust and some jitters but when he did throw, except for the pick almost every pass was right where it needed to be. We had 4 dropped passes that cost him well over 100 yards in receptions, one was a 65 yarder that fell right throug hthe wr's hands. There is no qb problem at nebraska, he is very good and will get better with each game. they key for nebraska is getting somne of the younger studs like meno holt and niles paul further ahead in the passing game to be wr targets and guys that drop balls will get knocked down the DC.
also. Nu was without their top tight end and wr yesterday. get those guys back and it makes a differance.
-
our air game is far from crappy. We had a qb shaking off some rust and some jitters but when he did throw, except for the pick almost every pass was right where it needed to be. We had 4 dropped passes that cost him well over 100 yards in receptions, one was a 65 yarder that fell right throug hthe wr's hands. There is no qb problem at nebraska, he is very good and will get better with each game. they key for nebraska is getting somne of the younger studs like meno holt and niles paul further ahead in the passing game to be wr targets and guys that drop balls will get knocked down the DC.
also. Nu was without their top tight end and wr yesterday. get those guys back and it makes a differance.
No excuses corn. He looked like crap and you and everyone else know that Callahan reigned him in because he isn't getting it yet. The season he may improve and get better, but he better get that way quick or it's going to be a long season.
-
Yeah, at the one point I was listening to the NU game I heard "hand off to lucky, hand off to lucky, hand off to rb#2, hand off to lucky, hand off to rb#2, hand off to lucky, Keller..With all day to throw, wow look at that O-line!...Incomplete, hand off to lucky"
At least you guys seem to have a pretty good O-line and run game.
-
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.
-
THE ORDER IS RESTORED
1) KSU/NU/CU
4) MU
5) ku/ISU
EMAW!
:ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
-
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.
Keller looked good when he threw on strike. The kid has talent, no one is denying that. The problem with Keller is that Callahan's system is very complex. You really have to be in that system for a couple of years to really be effective and I think that's a hindrance when you're talking about the having a player with the skills as Keller to effectively grasp it. Callahan is banking on Keller's sheer talent to overcome his ability to grasp the offense. No doubt, Keller would flourish in a less complex system you can get comfortable with, but you need a QB with a lot of "memory capacity" to get a good feel. Zac Taylor did well in that system, but it took time. You have to play it though to get it.
-
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.
Keller looked good when he threw on strike. The kid has talent, no one is denying that. The problem with Keller is that Callahan's system is very complex. You really have to be in that system for a couple of years to really be effective and I think that's a hindrance when you're talking about the having a player with the skills as Keller to effectively grasp it. Callahan is banking on Keller's sheer talent to overcome his ability to grasp the offense. No doubt, Keller would flourish in a less complex system you can get comfortable with, but you need a QB with a lot of "memory capacity" to get a good feel. Zac Taylor did well in that system, but it took time. You have to play it though to get it.
I did notice a lot of delay of game penalties but Keller didn't show me anything that Husker fans should get worried about, jmo..
-
He'll only get better the more he plays. There's no question that with Maurice Purify and Teafatiller back, everything will work that much better. Us playing without Purify is like Texas without Sweed; OSU without Bowman; Oklahoma without Kelly etc.
-
He'll only get better the more he plays. There's no question that with Maurice Purify and Teafatiller back, everything will work that much better. Us playing without Purify is like Texas without Sweed; OSU without Bowman; Oklahoma without Kelly etc.
Even with Sweed and Bowman, KSU managed to beat them. That's a pretty lousy argument.
I think the thing to remember, honestly, is that Keller has a lot to master. Again, I will say, that NU is a good team, but you looked exactly like you did against La Tech last year. Played poorly first half, blew it out in the second half. And stop using the excuses of Purify, Teafatiller, etc. If Keller is that good of QB, then it wouldn't matter what WR are out there.
-
The hell it doesn't matter. Purify can make catches that no other WR on our team can. You can't cover him 1-1 unless you have a Reggie Smith type player. It opens up the entire offense.
This year's team is nothing like last year's team against La Tech. 624 yards were the most put up in the entire Callahan era. We took a knee to end the game mercifully after playing our entire 2nd team the whole 4th quarter.
-
The hell it doesn't matter. Purify can make catches that no other WR on our team can. You can't cover him 1-1 unless you have a Reggie Smith type player. It opens up the entire offense.
This year's team is nothing like last year's team against La Tech. 624 yards were the most put up in the entire Callahan era. We took a knee to end the game mercifully after playing our entire 2nd team the whole 4th quarter.
THE ORDER IS RESTORED
1) KSU/NU/CU
4) MU
5) ku/ISU
EMAW!
:ksu: :ksu: :ksu:
THE ORDER...RESTORED!!!
-
We heard the same thing last year before K-State played ku, except you actually won that game vs. Texas. Now it's all about moral victories to a mediocre Auburn team breaking in a completely new o-line. ku is going to bring it to K-State in Manhattan. I'm thinking at least 3 TD's again this season.
52-7... damn, ku beat CMU by more than #9 Michigan last season.
-
1)NU (this is their year, better get it done
2)KSU
3)CU (think their ceiling is higher than others
4/5) ku/MU (interchangeable suck)
6)ISU
-
It's sad when you're pimping Colorado in order to avoid admitting that ku is the 2nd best team in the North. Colorado is horrible.
-
It's sad when you're pimping Colorado in order to avoid admitting that ku is the 2nd best team in the North. Colorado is horrible.
ku will eventually get a chance to prove their self.
Of course, it'll have to wait about a month. That must suck.
-
I saw with my own eyes how much better ku is this year. We didn't even dominate Northwestern State as bad as we dominated Central Michigan last night. Meanwhile, K-State is about on par with where you were last year minus big-time playmaker and NFL superstar Yamon Figurs.
Can't wait to prove it on the field in Manhattan.
-
I could see why you are excited, but lots of medicore BCS teams blitz crappy OOC teams all the time.
See, KSU vs North Texas in 2005.
ASU vs SJSU yesterday....etc..
must really suck that your team can't prove itself until october friggin 6th. I don't think I could describe in words how friggin fun the Auburn game was last night.
-
I am now convinced Auburn on the road = Central Michigan at home
-
I am now convinced Auburn on the road = Central Michigan at home
LOL. My sillyness meter just broke. ;)
-
We heard the same thing last year before K-State played ku, except you actually won that game vs. Texas. Now it's all about moral victories to a mediocre Auburn team breaking in a completely new o-line. ku is going to bring it to K-State in Manhattan. I'm thinking at least 3 TD's again this season.
52-7... damn, ku beat CMU by more than #9 Michigan last season.
Haha. Wait till the media rips you up for your cupcakes. No bowl for you. :blank:
-
ku fans want to convince themselves that CMU is good by saying they were 10-4 last year and went to a bowl.
Auburn is like 3rd in the last 5 years in wins in the SEC, or something like that. 33-5 last 3 years? I don't remember the stat. Something DOD-like.
-
13-23 loss to Auburn = highlight of K-State's season
Last year it was actually a 45-42 win vs. Texas.
Oh how times they are a changin.'
-
13-23 loss to Auburn = highlight of K-State's season
No way dude. The season just started. We'll have more opportuns. Besides, have you seen what most big 12 fans think of our performance? It's not just us that are impressed/surprised.
Last year it was actually a 45-42 win vs. Texas.
:love:
-
13-23 loss to Auburn = highlight of K-State's season
Last year it was actually a 45-42 win vs. Texas.
Oh how times they are a changin.'
It's nice to be competitive and actually beat high quality opponents.
I think we have a shot vs. Texas.
The blackout is scary though :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
They hate us, and will likely be one of the biggest rivalry games of the year.
-
52-7... damn, ku beat CMU by more than #9 Michigan last season.
And we all know how good Michigan is this year.
-
K-State will beat Texas again this season. Texas almost lost to Arkansas State for crying out loud.
-
K-State will beat Texas again this season. Texas almost lost to Arkansas State for crying out loud.
Something tells me that they'll probably show up for our game.
-
K-State will beat Texas again this season. Texas almost lost to Arkansas State for crying out loud.
No...stop it!!! (Even though you almost got the KSU-Auburn game right)
-
North
Kansas State OR Mizzou
Kansas
Nebraska
Colorado
Iowa State
South
Oklahoma
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor
LOL, you idiots lose and most of you still have your team ranked in the top, only KSUCK logic! Fortunately though for the rest of the world who doesnt share one common brain, ku with its 45 point victory is easily above a 0-1 team, regardless of who we played. And speaking of that, I LOVE how ESPN ragged on KSUCK about always playing cupcakes and getting beat when they finally play someone of significance to start a season :thumbsup:
-
As for why I have ku ranked so highly in mine:
I was expecting them to win last night, but not in blowout fashion. And they switched to Todd Reesing who, although not as good as so many ku fans have pimped him out to be, is leaps and bounds better than Kerry Meier. Given their schedule this year, they have the potential to win a LOT of games, and I think the fat man feels his seat getting pretty warm so will step it up in a no holds barred attack on every team they play. They're also ridiculously good at home. I'm predicting they beat Nebraska in Lawrence, and I still can't for the life of me figure out why they were stupid enough to give up home field advantage against Missouri.
There's really only one question about ku: How will they perform on the road? Mangino has won exactly two road games in the Big XII, and they were against Iowa State last year and Missouri a few years back. You can't have a successful season(and by that I mean .500 or above in conference play, OOC cupcake wins at home do not define good seasons) unless you can steal some games on the road.
We'll see when they come to Manhattan.