Author Topic: MU loss numbers  (Read 3068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
MU loss numbers
« on: January 08, 2011, 04:17:46 PM »
We all know why the Cats lost, but how did MU loss to the Buffs?  Shoot 4 for 16 from 3, were outrebounded by 15, forced only 11 TOs and let Colo shoot 47 percent. And Burks had no one who could guard Burks (12-19, 3-3 from 3).


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
Re: MU loss numbers
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2011, 04:21:22 PM »
Because for everyone but seemingly ku, even good teams, it's hard to win on the road in the big 12.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: MU loss numbers
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2011, 05:38:24 PM »
no one could guard Burks (12-19, 3-3 from 3).

i only saw the last 4-5 minutes or so, but mu was guarding burks.  he just scored anyways.  was crazy good.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: MU loss numbers
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2011, 06:06:01 PM »
no one could guard Burks (12-19, 3-3 from 3).

i only saw the last 4-5 minutes or so, but mu was guarding burks.  he just scored anyways.  was crazy good.

Durant-ish.  For a game. 

Offline Clevey 2 Times

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1260
    • View Profile
Re: MU loss numbers
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2011, 06:26:49 PM »
no one could guard Burks (12-19, 3-3 from 3).

i only saw the last 4-5 minutes or so, but mu was guarding burks.  he just scored anyways.  was crazy good.

Durant-ish.  For a game. 

So you're telling me we won't survive our trip to Boulder with a win?