That's actually probably pretty close to the all-Wooly team. Switch DeJesus to the 2, stick Cartier at the 3 (replacing Williams), then replace Seibrandt with Massey. So Wooly had arguably 3 of the top 5 players of his tenure on the same team and finished what, 7th, that year? Was that the peak 6-10 year?
Wooly had several peak 6-10 seasons.
I think I'd highly consider Harris and Hoskins in the all-Wooly team over DeJesus and Pasco.
Harris def. more athletic than DeJesus, but IIRC DeJesus was a more consistent shooter. Loved Hoskins, but he *was* undersized and seemed to struggle against teams with legit size (although a tremendously effective player for his size). Pervis was bigger, fairly well-coordinated, and also an effective player. The Fiasco may unfairly color the overall view of him, I feel.
Like I said, it's arguable. Lots of players with similar effectiveness. MichiganCat hit the big problem: lack of depth. Assemble 7 or 8 of those interchangable, decent players in one year, and Wooly could have made a run at .500.