Author Topic: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...  (Read 3921 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« on: December 22, 2010, 09:18:01 PM »
Being involved in the most "double foul" calls per minute played. OF ALL TIME. 

It happens a ridic amount of times w/ him.

It just makes me  :lol: everytime.


 :thumbsup:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38027
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2010, 09:28:34 PM »
I have never seen a double foul called that I agree with.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2010, 09:33:06 PM »
I have never seen a double foul called that I agree with.

Most of the time an official just uses it as a bail out b/c they really didn't see what happened.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2010, 11:06:46 PM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.

Offline Deez Nutz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1192
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2010, 12:23:36 AM »
Remember that one last year at ku and the guy literally had Jamar around his neck and threw him down on the floor?  That one was even worse than this one.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2010, 12:25:53 AM »
John Higgins and crew effing something up? I refuse to believe that.

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2010, 12:31:01 AM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.

It was as pathetic a display of officiating as I've seen by a college-level crew in a long time. The guy who made the call was standing over there by the table, clearly unsure of who the foul was on.  He just blew his whistle because some guy landed on the floor. HUGE officiating no-no...making the call when you don't actually see the foul occur. If you see the foul occur, then you keep looking down there until you've got the #.

Offline unleashthemob

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 601
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #7 on: December 23, 2010, 04:24:19 AM »
Sorry, but this game had the whole Los Vegas feel to it...I mean like the 2 top players suspended hours before game and a suspect officiating crew, whole thing smelled....don't think we were ever meant to win this!

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2010, 07:59:20 AM »
Remember that one last year at ku and the guy literally had Jamar around his neck and threw him down on the floor?  That one was even worse than this one.

Like it was yesterday, looking forward to this year - if were not up by 10 with a minute to go, we lose.
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2010, 08:03:30 AM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2010, 09:15:15 AM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32566
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2010, 09:20:55 AM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.

I have been eyeing a spot on the hate freddy bandwagon but the price seems too high, are you running any specials this week kougs?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: I would be willing to put a lot of money on Jamar...
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2010, 10:04:43 AM »
I pointed this out in chat, but the officials using replay to determine the parties of that double foul is a blatant misuse of the replay rule.  You can not use replay to see who commits a non-flagrant foul.  Jamar got screwed.
Jamar wanted it called on him because he only had 1 foul, and Freddy would have gotten his 4th.

Please. If Freddy would have fouled out sooner we might have won the game.
I was close enough to hear the conversation.
Where did you get that overnight bag?