EDIT: Thought I had this formatted right, but it didn't work out. Any help appreciated.Pullen this year vs. last year
Good teams: KenPom top 40
decent teams: 40-80
bad teams: 80+
2010-11 Opp Skill MIN FG FGA FG % FTM FTA 3PM 3PA 3P% PTS PPG PPS AST TO vs. good 7 games 184 25 80 31% 23 33 8 37 22% 81 11.57 1.01 13 19 vs. decent 4 games 130 24 60 40% 20 26 10 30 33% 78 19.50 1.30 12 14 vs. bad 11 games 282 59 123 48% 44 58 23 57 40% 185 16.82 1.50 39 19 Wins 12 games 360 71 155 46% 50 68 29 74 39% 221 18.41 1.43 51 35 losses 7 games 236 37 108 34% 37 49 12 50 24% 123 17.57 1.14 13 17 Overall 19 games 596 108 263 41% 87 117 41 124 33% 344 18.11 1.31 64 52
2009-10 vs. good 13 games 430 61 169 36% 78 101 37 104 36% 237 18.23 1.40 39 36 vs. decent 6 games 201 44 93 47% 36 40 21 49 43% 145 24.17 1.56 18 21 vs. bad 14 games 403 70 159 44% 67 83 35 89 39% 242 17.29 1.52 59 28
wins 26 games 773 140 311 45% 136 167 77 177 44% 493 18.96 1.58 94 68 losses 7 games 261 35 110 32% 45 57 16 65 25% 131 18.71 1.19 22 17
Overall 33 games 1034 175 421 42% 181 224 93 242 38% 624 18.91 1.48 116 85 |
Not sure what this means, if anything, but it sure looks to me like Pullen's numbers are a lot more inflated from games against bad teams this year than last year. Last year, he kept his shooting percentage and 3p% in a much more consistent range regardless of opponent ability, while this year there is a clear indication that his solid overall numbers are skewed due to good play against bad teams. Could be many reasons for this: less open shots due to more defensive focus on him is what I'm hoping for. However, I feel like he hit lots of guarded shots last year. Any thoughts?