Author Topic: Pussies (Read 5686 times)

Trim · « **on:** December 11, 2010, 05:39:07 PM »

Frank said something on the postgame like "I'm starting to think our team is just a bunch of... well, I'm not into saying negative things about our guys but they're not tough, strong..."

kstater · « **Reply #1 on:** December 11, 2010, 05:41:54 PM »

Referring to Wallace correct?

Benja · « **Reply #2 on:** December 11, 2010, 05:42:44 PM »

Frank lives for this. I'm starting to think he recruits so many three star fits just to have more lessons to teach.

Trim · « **Reply #3 on:** December 11, 2010, 05:43:03 PM »

Quote from: kstater on December 11, 2010, 05:41:54 PM

Referring to Wallace correct?

No. Illiterate?

kstater · « **Reply #4 on:** December 11, 2010, 05:44:42 PM »

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 05:43:03 PM

Quote from: kstater on December 11, 2010, 05:41:54 PM
Referring to Wallace correct?

No. Illiterate?

Did he say which one is illiterate?

MakeItRain · « **Reply #5 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:25:24 PM »

He was asked about a player, I'm assuming wyatt or stan were talking about someone playing well then Frank said sintering to the effect of yeah but I can't keep him on the floor because he makes so many mistakes. Was he referring to nick or jordan? This it's right before he nearly called then vaginas.

Thanks and I'll listen off of the air

Trim · « **Reply #6 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:30:10 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 07:25:24 PM

He was asked about a player, I'm assuming wyatt or stan were talking about someone playing well then Frank said sintering to the effect of yeah but I can't keep him on the floor because he makes so many mistakes. Was he referring to nick or jordan? This it's right before he nearly called then vaginas.

Thanks and I'll listen off of the air

Might've been Tay.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #7 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:42:52 PM »

I'm not a big fan of the lack of aggressiveness I see from the bigs on the offensive end. I don't think any of them are capable of taking it up strong.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #8 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:54:24 PM »

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 07:30:10 PM

Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 07:25:24 PM
He was asked about a player, I'm assuming wyatt or stan were talking about someone playing well then Frank said sintering to the effect of yeah but I can't keep him on the floor because he makes so many mistakes. Was he referring to nick or jordan? This it's right before he nearly called then vaginas.

Thanks and I'll listen off of the air

Might've been Tay.

no way he said that about the best player on the team

sys · « **Reply #9 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:58:14 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 07:54:24 PM

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 07:30:10 PM
Might've been Tay.

no way he said that about the best player on the team

pffft. it's nice that he can hit jumpshots now though.

D-FRED-BROWN · « **Reply #10 on:** December 11, 2010, 07:58:28 PM »

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 07:30:10 PM

Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 07:25:24 PM
He was asked about a player, I'm assuming wyatt or stan were talking about someone playing well then Frank said sintering to the effect of yeah but I can't keep him on the floor because he makes so many mistakes. Was he referring to nick or jordan? This it's right before he nearly called then vaginas.

Thanks and I'll listen off of the air

Might've been Tay.

it was JO.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #11 on:** December 11, 2010, 08:02:20 PM »

Quote from: D-FRED-BROWN on December 11, 2010, 07:58:28 PM

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 07:30:10 PM
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 07:25:24 PM
He was asked about a player, I'm assuming wyatt or stan were talking about someone playing well then Frank said sintering to the effect of yeah but I can't keep him on the floor because he makes so many mistakes. Was he referring to nick or jordan? This it's right before he nearly called then vaginas.

Thanks and I'll listen off of the air

Might've been Tay.

it was JO.

Not cool either.

pencat · « **Reply #12 on:** December 11, 2010, 08:37:16 PM »

Quote from: Trim on December 11, 2010, 05:39:07 PM

Frank said something on the postgame like "I'm starting to think our team is just a bunch of... well, I'm not into saying negative things about our guys but they're not tough, strong..."

Sounds like he posts regularly on this board.

jtksu · « **Reply #13 on:** December 11, 2010, 08:53:27 PM »

Yeah, it was probably JO. He said something similar in the quick post game chat thing when asked if he was pleased with JO's game today. BTW, I though JO looked pretty good today, except for the damn goaltending calls. It's almost like he is unaware that he isn't allowed to do that.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #14 on:** December 11, 2010, 09:00:03 PM »

Nothing wrong with those goaltends at all. It's not like he swatted balls that weren't going in. John Thompson once had Patrick Ewing do it intentionally twice in the national championship game.

jtksu · « **Reply #15 on:** December 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM »

If you don't swat those balls, there is still a chance they don't go in. If you goaltend, they definitely get the points. Please explain the advantage gained by purposely goaltending. If there was an advantage, wouldn't everyone do it? Or maybe John Thompson is just that much smarter than everyone?

AzCat · « **Reply #16 on:** December 11, 2010, 09:30:37 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on December 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM

If you don't swat those balls, there is still a chance they don't go in. If you goaltend, they definitely get the points. Please explain the advantage gained by purposely goaltending. If there was an advantage, wouldn't everyone do it? Or maybe John Thompson is just that much smarter than everyone?

Games won by John Thompson, Jr. as a D-I HC: 596
Games won by jtksu as a D-I HC: 0

MakeItRain · « **Reply #17 on:** December 11, 2010, 09:36:39 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on December 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM

If you don't swat those balls, there is still a chance they don't go in. If you goaltend, they definitely get the points. Please explain the advantage gained by purposely goaltending. If there was an advantage, wouldn't everyone do it? Or maybe John Thompson is just that much smarter than everyone?

Advantage is simple, gets your shot blocker(s) aggressive & let's the opponent know your shot blocker is going to be aggressive

Pexikan · « **Reply #18 on:** December 11, 2010, 09:49:28 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on December 11, 2010, 09:36:39 PM

Quote from: jtksu on December 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM
If you don't swat those balls, there is still a chance they don't go in. If you goaltend, they definitely get the points. Please explain the advantage gained by purposely goaltending. If there was an advantage, wouldn't everyone do it? Or maybe John Thompson is just that much smarter than everyone?

Advantage is simple, gets your shot blocker(s) aggressive & let's the opponent know your shot blocker is going to be aggressive

Can't guarantee that the ref blows his whistle at that moment, either. I'll take it. BTW, this goaltend wasn't near as obvious as Ewings in that game.

jtksu · « **Reply #19 on:** December 11, 2010, 10:37:13 PM »

Number of people who have coached or are currently coaching D1 basketball who do not use this practice: eleventy billion. Numer who have: 1.

Maybe a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like Ewing needs to swat every shot but every other shot blocker since the rule was initiated hasn't had to.

Also- Thompson lost that game. :retards:

sys · « **Reply #20 on:** December 11, 2010, 10:52:00 PM »

oh, good. just in time for another session of jtksu vs the world, everyone in it, and whatever they say.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #21 on:** December 11, 2010, 11:02:09 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on December 11, 2010, 10:37:13 PM

Number of people who have coached or are currently coaching D1 basketball who do not use this practice: eleventy billion. Numer who have: 1. Maybe a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) like Ewing needs to swat every shot but every other shot blocker since the rule was initiated hasn't had to. Also- Thompson lost that game. :retards:

I like how you obviously had to look that game up, and then act like you are some rough ridin' genius. The end result of the game was not relevant to the point or your question.

jtksu · « **Reply #22 on:** December 11, 2010, 11:06:18 PM »

So winning or losing are not important? You have a lot of stupid ideas. Wonder if Thompson would have liked those 4 pts back?

Trim · « **Reply #23 on:** December 12, 2010, 03:31:29 AM »

wabash909 · « **Reply #24 on:** December 12, 2010, 07:47:35 AM »

Quote from: jtksu on December 11, 2010, 11:06:18 PM

So winning or losing are not important? You have a lot of stupid ideas. Wonder if Thompson would have liked those 4 pts back?

This thread is about our team being a bunch of pussies. Let's keep it on topic.