0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
Bad Things:Love ya Stevie but that broadcast team might be the worst I can recall doing a KSU game. Maybe I'm just tired and cranky but holy balls that seemed brutal.
agree with some of your posthelp D was either amazing or absolute cac. more often amazing though. frank said he didn't play kelly much because of his defensive rebounding, that would attribute to his lack on inclusion in the offense.
frank said he didn't play kelly much because of his defensive rebounding, that would attribute to his lack on inclusion in the offense.
Kelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 12:59:50 AMKelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.That's your only comment in this thread? :sad:
Quote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:05:53 AMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 12:59:50 AMKelly is simply not in good enough game shape to play 30 minutes of high energy Kelly at this point.That's your only comment in this thread? :sad:Nothing much more to add/subtract. Good job.
Loved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AMLoved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.
Quote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:12:22 AMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AMLoved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though... not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...
Quote from: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:13:40 AMQuote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:12:22 AMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AMLoved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though... not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game."Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.
Quote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:15:25 AMQuote from: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:13:40 AMQuote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:12:22 AMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AMLoved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though... not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game."Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.did pullen not prove himself enough for you last year? and sprads is clearly a good FT shooter. name a player on the team you would have rather had at the line than either of them?
Quote from: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:16:59 AMQuote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:15:25 AMQuote from: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:13:40 AMQuote from: kougar24 on December 04, 2010, 01:12:22 AMQuote from: ksu_FAN on December 04, 2010, 01:10:03 AMLoved the validation of Frank's FT talking point BTW. You know Frank was chuckling on the inside as those four FTs went in to seal the deal.just so happened to be the only 2 good FT shooters on the team though... not that i disagree with his point because when it matters they should be the ones at the line...Pullen was only shooting like 60-some percent coming in to tonight's game. Also: Sprads was a true frosh playing his first college road game."Only 2 good FT shooters" is a relative term.did pullen not prove himself enough for you last year? and sprads is clearly a good FT shooter. name a player on the team you would have rather had at the line than either of them?You missed my point entirely. That is why it's relative, because neither "should" have been automatic in that situation tonight due to the reasons I stated, but they hit them when it mattered most.Which is why Frank was totally validated.
they came through.
Quote from: swish1 on December 04, 2010, 01:27:38 AMthey came through.EXACTLY, said Frank.