Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5785888 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2350 on: December 10, 2012, 11:56:17 AM »
-I'll give you Shields being a #1.  I won't give you Hosmer and Moustakas being in their primes.  Hosmer was awful last year, and if Moustakas doesn't get better.
So are you honestly dismissing Hosmer and Moustakas improving and becoming better players than they showed last year? 

-My problem is that we have every key offensive piece locked up through at least 2015 except Butler, who we have a $12.5M team option for in '15.  This was short sighted.  If Moustakas and Hosmer don't play near an All-Star level or if one of these new pitchers underachieves, I don't see us as more than slightly over .500 and on the borderline of the playoffs. 
You mean the key offensive pieces that "aren't any longer in their primes" and were "awful last year?"  And it seems like you forget how productive Hosmer and Moustakas were in the minor leagues, just like Myers was.  They will continue to improve.

-Then James Shields is gone after 2014.  I like that we have increased our payroll, but I wish we would have thrown that money at Anibal Sanchez and kept our farm system intact.  We gave up 3 of our top 4 prospects for this. 
I can't disagree with this, but I don't think we realistically could have signed Sanchez, even with the increased payroll dollars.

Not dismissing Hosmer and Moustakas improving at all.  Just don't agree with them being "in their primes."  We really need to hope they haven't reached their primes yet.  I think they will continue to get better, but it may take a couple more years.  Just hope it happens while we still have Shields.
:adios:

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2351 on: December 10, 2012, 12:02:34 PM »
-I'll give you Shields being a #1.  I won't give you Hosmer and Moustakas being in their primes.  Hosmer was awful last year, and if Moustakas doesn't get better.
So are you honestly dismissing Hosmer and Moustakas improving and becoming better players than they showed last year? 

-My problem is that we have every key offensive piece locked up through at least 2015 except Butler, who we have a $12.5M team option for in '15.  This was short sighted.  If Moustakas and Hosmer don't play near an All-Star level or if one of these new pitchers underachieves, I don't see us as more than slightly over .500 and on the borderline of the playoffs. 
You mean the key offensive pieces that "aren't any longer in their primes" and were "awful last year?"  And it seems like you forget how productive Hosmer and Moustakas were in the minor leagues, just like Myers was.  They will continue to improve.

-Then James Shields is gone after 2014.  I like that we have increased our payroll, but I wish we would have thrown that money at Anibal Sanchez and kept our farm system intact.  We gave up 3 of our top 4 prospects for this. 
I can't disagree with this, but I don't think we realistically could have signed Sanchez, even with the increased payroll dollars.

Not dismissing Hosmer and Moustakas improving at all.  Just don't agree with them being "in their primes."  We really need to hope they haven't reached their primes yet.  I think they will continue to get better, but it may take a couple more years.  Just hope it happens while we still have Shields.

I see what you are saying.  I thought you meant to say they were "past their primes."

 :cheers:
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2352 on: December 10, 2012, 01:27:46 PM »
ROYALS FEVER! CATCH IT!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2353 on: December 10, 2012, 01:28:13 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! A MAJOR LEAGUE ATTRACTION!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2354 on: December 10, 2012, 01:29:06 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! IT'S A HIT!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2355 on: December 10, 2012, 01:30:08 PM »
OUR TIME!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2356 on: December 10, 2012, 01:30:37 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! CATCH THE THRILL!

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2357 on: December 10, 2012, 01:31:26 PM »
get in the swing of it!

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2358 on: December 10, 2012, 01:31:48 PM »

DON'T FORGET THE GUYS!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2359 on: December 10, 2012, 01:32:04 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! YOUR HOMETOWN TEAM!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2360 on: December 10, 2012, 01:32:45 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! BE A PART OF IT ALL!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2361 on: December 10, 2012, 01:33:32 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! YOU GOTTA LOVE THESE GUYS!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2362 on: December 10, 2012, 01:34:15 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! GET IN THE GAME!

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2363 on: December 10, 2012, 01:34:24 PM »
Thread really took a turn for the better.  Thanks, SD
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2364 on: December 10, 2012, 01:34:53 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! TURN ON THE GOOD TIMES!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2365 on: December 10, 2012, 01:35:44 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! WE HAVE A REALLY GOOD PITCHER! REALLY GOOD!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88580
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2366 on: December 10, 2012, 01:37:09 PM »
ROYALS BASEBALL! TRUE BLUE TRADITION!

ALSO NEW BLUE TRADITION THE VERY NEXT YEAR IIRC!

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2367 on: December 10, 2012, 01:39:37 PM »

"True. Blue. Tradition."!

It's a minor change sd, but I think this is how it was pimped.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2368 on: December 10, 2012, 01:40:30 PM »
"it's a hit" is my all time favorite. they could play baseball for a gagillion more years and never top that tag. the shear absurdity with how long the "rooooooyaalllllllllllls basebaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllll" followed by the rapid fire "it'sahit" just will not be repeated in our lifetime. imo.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2369 on: December 10, 2012, 01:42:36 PM »
¡NOSOTROS CREEMOS!

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12305
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2370 on: December 10, 2012, 01:51:54 PM »
Eghhh! The cup I am drinking out of at my desk today.



A MAJOR LEAGUE ATTRACTION

1988

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2371 on: December 10, 2012, 02:00:19 PM »

¡JUNTOS PODEMOS!
:adios:

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2372 on: December 10, 2012, 02:08:56 PM »
it's like bizzaro catzacker on blue roids in here
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10542
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2373 on: December 10, 2012, 02:16:45 PM »
I think it was major league moments. Not major league attraction.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2374 on: December 10, 2012, 02:46:40 PM »
BLUE WINGS RISIN--wait, crap.