Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5902649 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60500 on: April 27, 2016, 07:43:06 AM »
i'm pretty depressed about this (tonight's game, the multi-game trend of shitty defense and prolly being 2.5 back of the white sox, of all teams).

Yes. This was one of the most disappointing games of the season so far. After we came back and got 4 runs and the lead I thought we would win for sure. We have won most of those games in situations like that the last 2+ years. Then our defense let us down. Volquez didn't have his best stuff, but with what we expect to be normal Royals defense, he gets us 6 innings and leaves with a 4-3 lead.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60501 on: April 27, 2016, 08:29:22 AM »
We played Chris Getz over Gia and i'm the dumbass.  :lol:

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60502 on: April 27, 2016, 08:39:01 AM »
My highlight of the game was Phys describing the plot of "Talladega Nights."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60503 on: April 27, 2016, 09:28:17 AM »
We played Chris Getz over Gia and i'm the dumbass.  :lol:

He is batting .188 this year WC.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60504 on: April 27, 2016, 09:32:04 AM »
We played Chris Getz over Gia and i'm the dumbass.  :lol:

He is batting .188 this year WC.
He's been very solid for them cf3 and you know it. He would have been better than CG. Every time he came up, he played better than Getz, but we refused to play him over him. It was so bizarre.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60505 on: April 27, 2016, 09:40:34 AM »
We played Chris Getz over Gia and i'm the dumbass.  :lol:

He is batting .188 this year WC.
He's been very solid for them cf3 and you know it. He would have been better than CG. Every time he came up, he played better than Getz, but we refused to play him over him. It was so bizarre.

he's played 1 year with them, and yeah last year he was fine. not great, not a difference maker, but I guess a league average player. When he was with the Royals he had plenty of chances and he could not hit. look at his stats WC. He had no range and was injured all the time and never hit .250 for us. He is older than Moose, Salvy, and Hosmer. When is he going to blossom? When he's 32? He hit one homerun last night. BFD.

We played Getz over him because Getz had similar or better offensive numbers and better range. Quit being a revisionist.




Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60506 on: April 27, 2016, 09:42:15 AM »
He was 3-4 last night, but yeah.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60507 on: April 27, 2016, 09:43:45 AM »
Giovatella is 28 and has 9 career Homeruns. He's not exactly the one that got away. I know he's little and white and you played just like him in whatever league you played in WC but he's not actually that valuable of a player. We're fine without him.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60508 on: April 27, 2016, 09:44:46 AM »
 :jerk: I could careless about HR's, dork. 2nd baseman aren't really known for it anyways.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60509 on: April 27, 2016, 09:45:33 AM »
He was 3-4 last night, but yeah.

that is 1 game. you are being an idiot. Infante was also on base 3 times.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60510 on: April 27, 2016, 09:46:13 AM »
:jerk: I could careless about HR's, dork. 2nd baseman aren't really known for it anyways.

well he's not really that good at singles or doubles or fielding either.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60511 on: April 27, 2016, 09:49:08 AM »
He's serviceable enough to not pay 8 million a year on some below average, old, 2nd baseman. That's all i'm saying, cf3. Relax, it's Wednesday. I get it, the Royals have made a lot of fantastic moves, but the deal they made for 2nd base stands out every year.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60512 on: April 27, 2016, 09:50:29 AM »
I hate to do this so early in the year, but I'm instituting the AAA thread like we did in 2014 when TownieCat was king in there. WC, you are only allowed in the other MLB thread.

Everyone else is on a probationary period. Get it together.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60513 on: April 27, 2016, 09:53:25 AM »
Nice tap out. :lol:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60514 on: April 27, 2016, 09:54:34 AM »
please take missouriscribe with you TIA

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60515 on: April 27, 2016, 09:56:58 AM »
This team will be lucky to finish 4th in the division this year.

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60516 on: April 27, 2016, 10:02:09 AM »
please take missouriscribe with you TIA

LOL. So sensitive.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60517 on: April 27, 2016, 10:03:16 AM »
please take missouriscribe with you TIA

LOL. So sensitive.
He thinks he owns the Royals, 'scribe. SMDH.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18082
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60518 on: April 27, 2016, 10:07:39 AM »
Wacky is right.  We should have kept the guy hitting approximately 100 pts below Infante because he went 3 for 4 once.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60519 on: April 27, 2016, 10:19:37 AM »
Thank you! Also probably costs 1/8th the price too.  :cheers:

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60520 on: April 27, 2016, 10:21:00 AM »
please take missouriscribe with you TIA

LOL. So sensitive.
He thinks he owns the Royals, 'scribe. SMDH.

I wouldn't say that. I think he should either be less thin skinned or less wrong, is all.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60521 on: April 27, 2016, 10:23:19 AM »
what in particular am i wrong about again scribe?

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60522 on: April 27, 2016, 10:26:24 AM »
That the Royals shouldn't boost Salvy's initial long term contract, and that they wouldn't, is one.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60523 on: April 27, 2016, 10:31:00 AM »
That the Royals shouldn't boost Salvy's initial long term contract, and that they wouldn't, is one.

meh. whatevs. I wouldn't have done it but he's still way under market value IMO so good for the Royals. 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60524 on: April 27, 2016, 10:31:35 AM »
Ned Yost. Boom!