Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5911662 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19149
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59175 on: April 10, 2016, 04:41:42 PM »
TLBG!
:adios:

Offline Missouriscribe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 651
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59176 on: April 10, 2016, 04:42:11 PM »
boom, what a win!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59177 on: April 10, 2016, 04:42:23 PM »
sys has to be so vindicated and happy right now.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59178 on: April 10, 2016, 04:43:55 PM »
Sys what is gores WAR if used correctly?  Has to be 20 at least.

so far, it's 1 per 5 games.  that works out to about 36, i believe.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67543
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59179 on: April 10, 2016, 04:44:13 PM »
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59180 on: April 10, 2016, 04:44:59 PM »
 :royals:  :royals: :royals:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59181 on: April 10, 2016, 05:45:48 PM »

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59182 on: April 10, 2016, 06:22:02 PM »
Posse stat of the day....

3rd 1-run Win of the season already. Since July 23,2014 the Royals are an impressive 46-23 in games decided by 1 run (counts playoffs).  This 46th one was a little different than the others. Thank you T Gore

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59183 on: April 10, 2016, 06:27:17 PM »
 :driving:

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11140
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59184 on: April 10, 2016, 06:28:10 PM »
Gore is a waste of a roster spot.
I still stand by that statement.

Quote
"People wonder why we had (Gore) on our roster. That's why," Royals manager Ned Yost said.

Wacky got #yosted
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater


Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59185 on: April 10, 2016, 06:33:24 PM »
I don't know if it is a gE consensus or not, and I don't care. If asked, I would say, "yes, sys is good for the Royals thread."


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67543
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59186 on: April 10, 2016, 06:38:43 PM »
I don't know if it is a gE consensus or not, and I don't care. If asked, I would say, "yes, sys is good for the Royals thread."


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)

It's the only reason I even open this thread
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32571
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59187 on: April 10, 2016, 06:39:04 PM »
Sys is the royals thread slobber. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67543
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59188 on: April 10, 2016, 06:49:50 PM »
We all saw what this place looked like when cf3 ran the joint  :Ugh:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59189 on: April 10, 2016, 07:18:49 PM »
Sys is very loud. That's for sure!

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59190 on: April 10, 2016, 07:38:49 PM »
Lots of things I don't like about what has been said recently in here

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32571
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59191 on: April 10, 2016, 07:57:29 PM »
We are on pace to win 130 games you guys.    If we sweep the 'Stros I think it's safe to say we are the greatest team to ever play the game.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67543
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59192 on: April 10, 2016, 08:15:19 PM »
Is 130 a lot of wins?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59193 on: April 10, 2016, 08:33:19 PM »
We all saw what this place looked like when cf3 ran the joint  :Ugh:

It was a damn machine.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59194 on: April 10, 2016, 08:46:58 PM »
Is 130 a lot of wins?
Not when 161 are available

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59195 on: April 10, 2016, 08:49:26 PM »
And as far as Sys goes, who else would put the image in our mind's eyes of Eric Hosmer, Royals 2nd Baseman? No one. That's who.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40578
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59196 on: April 10, 2016, 09:06:13 PM »
we should play only the B team guys tomorrow. chris young at minute maid park is pretty LOL

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59197 on: April 10, 2016, 09:07:00 PM »
we should play only the B team guys tomorrow. chris young at minute maid park is pretty LOL

Agreed.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59198 on: April 10, 2016, 09:17:02 PM »
I do want Moose to play though. Would be nice to get him a few cheapies on his way to breaking Balboni's record.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40578
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #59199 on: April 10, 2016, 09:29:25 PM »
Gordon can play too. if you are batting .167 or whatever you dont get days off