Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4684358 times)

atlcat21 and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online tdaver

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1887
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25450 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:13 AM »
 :emawkid:

Offline WildCatzPhreak

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 791
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25451 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:20 AM »
MOOOOOOOOSE!


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25452 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:29 AM »
Mike Freaking Mooose.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64040
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25453 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:35 AM »
Moosey  :D
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25454 on: October 03, 2014, 12:01:45 AM »
Sorry, #beRoyal, love you guys... MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSEEE
:adios:

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7565
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25455 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:12 AM »
High fiving the Royal fan in the dugout suite!

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25456 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:26 AM »
 :excited:

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15858
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25457 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:34 AM »
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25458 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:47 AM »
Now let's just hope Holland hasn't been warming up too long.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9373
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25459 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:47 AM »
:royals:
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25460 on: October 03, 2014, 12:02:48 AM »
the best part about not knowing anything about baseball is that i can only make fun of other teams' players for looking weird and never have to eat my words

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25461 on: October 03, 2014, 12:03:05 AM »
that and it's fun when our guys do cool crap

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25462 on: October 03, 2014, 12:03:31 AM »
How perfect is it that at exactly midnight Moose hits a bomb

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64040
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25463 on: October 03, 2014, 12:04:55 AM »
October baseball  :love:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25464 on: October 03, 2014, 12:05:18 AM »
Almost want Duffy to stay in until he gives up a runner. Other part of me wants him starting on Monday.
:adios:

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25465 on: October 03, 2014, 12:05:50 AM »
BOOM [redacted]

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10152
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25466 on: October 03, 2014, 12:06:13 AM »
SO NERVOUS, COME ON, BE ROYAL

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25467 on: October 03, 2014, 12:06:56 AM »
Guys Holland is coming in. We're going to win this sucker

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64040
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25468 on: October 03, 2014, 12:08:06 AM »
That moose Homer was a great call by ned
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25469 on: October 03, 2014, 12:08:41 AM »
Ned played it for this.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25470 on: October 03, 2014, 12:09:20 AM »
Do it for your kid, Greg!
:adios:

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25471 on: October 03, 2014, 12:10:05 AM »
Remember when Ned didn't freak out and put Holland in earlier? Well now we've got about a 95% chance of winning this.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25472 on: October 03, 2014, 12:10:16 AM »
Ned played it for this.

Yes, he has done a masterful job managing this game.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15858
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25473 on: October 03, 2014, 12:10:48 AM »
Ned to the world.

If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #25474 on: October 03, 2014, 12:11:22 AM »
Remember when Ned didn't freak out and put Holland in earlier? Well now we've got about a 95% chance of winning this.

Better than 95%, really.