Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4764403 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24550 on: September 30, 2014, 09:10:43 PM »
Ned is stupid.

they were going to score multiple runs on shields

maybe. But you put him in a situation he has never been in and just hope he succeeds. Not a good plan. Use guys that have been there and done that.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64279
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24551 on: September 30, 2014, 09:11:36 PM »
Oakland players are all ugly
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24552 on: September 30, 2014, 09:11:47 PM »
eff you ned, why did you put in herrera you idiot?!?!?!?! 

-goEMAW

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51710
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24553 on: September 30, 2014, 09:12:30 PM »
Choke job, glad I turned down the free ticket

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24554 on: September 30, 2014, 09:12:39 PM »
Paid Shields a lot of money not to trust him finish that inning....

Offline detch23

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 228
  • My Dire Wolf's name is Willie
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24555 on: September 30, 2014, 09:13:33 PM »
Now we play the reliever with runners on base.

This is why I hate Yost. Lets try a little league steal play with our slowest guy, oh ya then lets bring in a starter instead of leaning our proven relievers.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24556 on: September 30, 2014, 09:13:52 PM »
OMG NED WHY DID YOU PUT IN HERRERA?!?!?!

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24557 on: September 30, 2014, 09:14:35 PM »
 :buh-bye:

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24558 on: September 30, 2014, 09:14:36 PM »
#6thInning :-(

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24559 on: September 30, 2014, 09:14:58 PM »
shields is the one who mumped us you idiots, he allowed two men on with no outs. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39254
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24560 on: September 30, 2014, 09:15:15 PM »
In a way, it's like we lost 100 games again this season

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29387
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24561 on: September 30, 2014, 09:16:04 PM »
The only consolation that I have is that David Glass will never live to see the Royals win a playoff game.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40566
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24562 on: September 30, 2014, 09:16:36 PM »
this losing by three runs sucks.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24563 on: September 30, 2014, 09:17:16 PM »
 :buh-bye:
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24564 on: September 30, 2014, 09:18:10 PM »
you'll never win playing this style of baseball. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37161
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24565 on: September 30, 2014, 09:18:33 PM »
:buh-bye:

You were never in the room in the first place, you son of a bitch.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24566 on: September 30, 2014, 09:20:40 PM »
let's be honest, we're by far the worst team in the AL to make the playoffs.  winning tonight would have been a fluke.

Offline detch23

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 228
  • My Dire Wolf's name is Willie
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24567 on: September 30, 2014, 09:20:51 PM »
shields is the one who mumped us you idiots, he allowed two men on with no outs.

You're the idiot.

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24568 on: September 30, 2014, 09:22:42 PM »
Let's pitch our youngest starter as a reliever on one day's rest after throwing 70+ pitches.   Is there no one in the rough ridin' clubhouse who can stand up to this idiot.  I don't care if there were two on or if there were 0 on with 2 outs, it's inexcusable

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24569 on: September 30, 2014, 09:24:06 PM »
this is 100% on shields.  lester has given up some runs but he doesn't allow 2 guys to get on with no outs in later innings.  we never really stood a chance.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24570 on: September 30, 2014, 09:24:41 PM »
Let's pitch our youngest starter as a reliever on one day's rest after throwing 70+ pitches.   Is there no one in the rough ridin' clubhouse who can stand up to this idiot.  I don't care if there were two on or if there were 0 on with 2 outs, it's inexcusable

you're dumb

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24571 on: September 30, 2014, 09:24:57 PM »
The only consolation that I have is that David Glass will never live to see the Royals win a playoff game.

he doesn't rough ridin' care, he has lived to see his favorite team the Cardinals win multiple WSs

 :hanged smiley: :goodbyecruelworld: :goodbyecruelworld:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24572 on: September 30, 2014, 09:25:02 PM »
Let's pitch our youngest starter as a reliever on one day's rest after throwing 70+ pitches.   Is there no one in the rough ridin' clubhouse who can stand up to this idiot.  I don't care if there were two on or if there were 0 on with 2 outs, it's inexcusable

you're also dumb

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24573 on: September 30, 2014, 09:26:38 PM »
This is gut wrenching.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40566
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #24574 on: September 30, 2014, 09:26:52 PM »
like i don't think losing 3-2 or 4-3 would have been so bad.  or maybe it's having had the lead for a couple few innings that makes it seem bad.  either way, it seems like one of the not so good ways to lose.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."