0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 10:04:00 PMmaybe should go in the mlb thread but does anyone else think it's stupid backwards how the count goes balls-strikes instead of strikes-balls?No. Never.
maybe should go in the mlb thread but does anyone else think it's stupid backwards how the count goes balls-strikes instead of strikes-balls?
Quote from: Cartierfor3 on July 30, 2014, 10:07:57 PMQuote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 10:04:00 PMmaybe should go in the mlb thread but does anyone else think it's stupid backwards how the count goes balls-strikes instead of strikes-balls?No. Never.makes more sense to have strikes first
Is his nickname the black squirrel?
Quote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on July 30, 2014, 09:45:40 PMIs his nickname the black squirrel?ok.
Quote from: bones129 on July 30, 2014, 09:21:55 PMGiants just released Uggla. Don't even think about it, Dayton.I'm a braves fan and had no idea he even went to the giantsBut you Do. Not. Want.
Giants just released Uggla. Don't even think about it, Dayton.
Quote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 10:04:00 PMmaybe should go in the mlb thread but does anyone else think it's stupid backwards how the count goes balls-strikes instead of strikes-balls?i always assume it's strikes balls until i see a leading 3 and then go "oh, yeah..."
it really messed with me when i was a kid
Quote from: j-dub on July 30, 2014, 11:08:50 PMit really messed with me when i was a kidi knew roughly 100x more about baseball when i was a kid i think. the game has passed me by
Quote from: sys on July 30, 2014, 10:23:15 PMQuote from: Sundance»¤«Kid on July 30, 2014, 09:45:40 PMIs his nickname the black squirrel?ok.who, though?
welp cf3, looks like i was right, the natural way to say the count is strikes first, 2 huge studs have confirmed this
Quote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 11:13:50 PMwelp cf3, looks like i was right, the natural way to say the count is strikes first, 2 huge studs have confirmed thisno its fine the way it is
Quote from: Cartierfor3 on July 31, 2014, 08:06:22 AMQuote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 11:13:50 PMwelp cf3, looks like i was right, the natural way to say the count is strikes first, 2 huge studs have confirmed thisno its fine the way it isC43 is correct. Strikes first is the way is supposed to be.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on July 31, 2014, 08:36:58 AMQuote from: Cartierfor3 on July 31, 2014, 08:06:22 AMQuote from: seven on July 30, 2014, 11:13:50 PMwelp cf3, looks like i was right, the natural way to say the count is strikes first, 2 huge studs have confirmed thisno its fine the way it isC43 is correct. Strikes first is the way is supposed to be.you mean balls first
The only longtime baseball thing that confused me was shortstop being 6 when you keep score. SS should be 5 and 3rd base should be 6 but that's ok