Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5795840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47975 on: September 23, 2015, 02:40:24 PM »
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47955
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47976 on: September 23, 2015, 02:51:11 PM »
pretty sure that jeremy guthrie's family sits in section 151


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40545
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47977 on: September 23, 2015, 02:55:15 PM »
pretty sure that jeremy guthrie's family sits in section 151

applejack better stay away from guthrie's family

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47978 on: September 23, 2015, 02:56:24 PM »


Royals will win and Twins will lose tonight.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47955
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47979 on: September 23, 2015, 02:58:04 PM »
pretty sure that jeremy guthrie's family sits in section 151

applejack better stay away from guthrie's family

why?  his kids would probably kick applejack's ass :lol: 


^adorablol


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6338
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47980 on: September 23, 2015, 03:01:44 PM »
I would knock the ice cream cones out of each kids hands if I see them tomorrow. Maybe shove mom to the ground.
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40545
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47981 on: September 23, 2015, 03:03:28 PM »
the littlest kid with the mask looks like a humongous stud muffin

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47982 on: September 23, 2015, 03:12:23 PM »
what's that, little guthrie? you cant hear applejack?

I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47983 on: September 23, 2015, 03:13:40 PM »
Thanks for the backup, mathcat.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47984 on: September 23, 2015, 03:19:57 PM »
where are you getting those stats?

baseball prospectus, fwar.  2012 is not included because that was before the royals signed him to the free agent contract that will pay him 23.2 million dollars to pitch for 2013-2015.  if you use rwar, he gets 2.2 - 1.9 = -.3.  little better.

you're right that the value of that contract is heavily influenced by how bad he has been this year.  if he'd have continued to pitch another 1.1 war year in 2015, he'd have provided more or less fair value (not good value) for the life of his contract.  however, he has not.  as a result, and with the benefit of hindsight, signing him to a 3 year deal has to be viewed as a mistake.

"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47985 on: September 23, 2015, 03:41:29 PM »
what's that, little guthrie? you cant hear applejack?



he wears his baseball uniform around the house?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67468
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47986 on: September 23, 2015, 03:46:29 PM »
You wear a different person's uniform around the house
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47987 on: September 23, 2015, 03:47:30 PM »

where are you getting those stats?

baseball prospectus, fwar.  2012 is not included because that was before the royals signed him to the free agent contract that will pay him 23.2 million dollars to pitch for 2013-2015.  if you use rwar, he gets 2.2 - 1.9 = -.3.  little better.

you're right that the value of that contract is heavily influenced by how bad he has been this year.  if he'd have continued to pitch another 1.1 war year in 2015, he'd have provided more or less fair value (not good value) for the life of his contract.  however, he has not.  as a result, and with the benefit of hindsight, signing him to a 3 year deal has to be viewed as a mistake.

WAR does a bad job of measuring the positive impact that an innings eating pitcher has on the games in which he does not pitch.
:adios:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47988 on: September 23, 2015, 03:51:50 PM »
You wear a different person's uniform around the house
Oh, snap!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47989 on: September 23, 2015, 03:57:11 PM »
You wear a different person's uniform around the house

not tucked in with baseball pants

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47990 on: September 23, 2015, 04:03:27 PM »
For the record, I think Guthrie benefited greatly from being a Royal, and the Royals benefited from him too. Both sides won the contract. We have to remember how bad Royals starting pitching was in 2012. He brought stability and the consistency to pitch keeping his team in games (the record on games he started is a fluke, but it shows he didn't get rocked much until this year) and eat innings. 200 IP in 2013 and 2014 allowed the bullpen's development, and made Hoch and Davis moving to the pen possible.

You're almost never going to sign a player over 30 for a deal longer than 2 years and get value out of the end of the deal. Like mocat said, its how contracts work.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47991 on: September 23, 2015, 04:06:32 PM »
posnanski has a good article on baseball contracts, and Matt Harvey:

http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/why-matt-harvey-mets-dispute-innings-total/

Quote
Here, in very, very general terms, is how baseball pitchers’ careers go: They generally peak at about age 27, stay pretty close to their peak for three or four years, start to decline, slowly at first, and then they begin a steady and sometimes precipitous fall. This means that a pitcher’s prime years will generally be between ages 26 and 30. This is also true for everyday players.

So here’s what happens:

— Young baseball players are some of the most underpaid people in American professional sports.

— Old baseball players are some of the most overpaid people in American professional sports.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47992 on: September 23, 2015, 04:10:41 PM »
WAR does a bad job of measuring the positive impact that an innings eating pitcher has on the games in which he does not pitch.

i think that's probably true.  but value has to be measured in terms of what else you could have done with the money.  does anyone think that the royals couldn't have done at least as well by signing 8 joe blantons to minor league deals every spring and calling up the best of them as needed?


in general, i don't think you tend to make out very well by signing near replacement level players to long-term deals.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47993 on: September 23, 2015, 04:13:52 PM »
— Young baseball players are some of the most underpaid people in American professional sports.

— Old baseball players are some of the most overpaid people in American professional sports.

yeah, baseball salaries are really weird.  it's like, not at all a meritocracy, like you find in most sports.  the most equitable thing about it is that really good players tend to get to the majors faster than less good players.  but late bloomers, like cain, and maybe to a lesser extent orlando, get completely mumped.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40545
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47994 on: September 23, 2015, 04:18:48 PM »
and then you have Sal Perez's contract  :lol:

Online 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47995 on: September 23, 2015, 04:19:18 PM »

WAR does a bad job of measuring the positive impact that an innings eating pitcher has on the games in which he does not pitch.

i think that's probably true.  but value has to be measured in terms of what else you could have done with the money.  does anyone think that the royals couldn't have done at least as well by signing 8 joe blantons to minor league deals every spring and calling up the best of them as needed?


in general, i don't think you tend to make out very well by signing near replacement level players to long-term deals.

No doubt, Guts wasn't all that effective, but no way 8 Joe Blantons are pitching 400+ innings in 2013-'14. Look at these names!
:adios:

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40545
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47996 on: September 23, 2015, 04:23:40 PM »
Max Scherzer  :sdeek:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47997 on: September 23, 2015, 04:23:55 PM »
8 joe blantons would only need to pitch 50 innings each.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47998 on: September 23, 2015, 04:24:16 PM »


— Young baseball players are some of the most underpaid people in American professional sports.

— Old baseball players are some of the most overpaid people in American professional sports.

yeah, baseball salaries are really weird.  it's like, not at all a meritocracy, like you find in most sports.  the most equitable thing about it is that really good players tend to get to the majors faster than less good players.  but late bloomers, like cain, and maybe to a lesser extent orlando, get completely mumped.

You aren't very well schooled in pro sports contracts. It's very common in the NBA and NFL for vets to be wildly overpaid while younger good players make much less than they're worth.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47955
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #47999 on: September 23, 2015, 04:27:55 PM »


— Young baseball players are some of the most underpaid people in American professional sports.

— Old baseball players are some of the most overpaid people in American professional sports.

yeah, baseball salaries are really weird.  it's like, not at all a meritocracy, like you find in most sports.  the most equitable thing about it is that really good players tend to get to the majors faster than less good players.  but late bloomers, like cain, and maybe to a lesser extent orlando, get completely mumped.

You aren't very well schooled in pro sports contracts. It's very common in the NBA and NFL for vets to be wildly overpaid while younger good players make much less than they're worth.

if they had this for bbs'rs, i'd be getting paid FOR eff SAKE


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.