Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5868031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44325 on: August 19, 2015, 04:27:19 PM »
so clean cut is clean shaven with short hair.  has to be both, neither is sufficient on it's own.

feel like its also a personality and body language thing

do you have an example of a clean shaven, short-haired but not clean cut person?  trout was mentioned, but his clean cutness was disputed.
Jim McMahon
The Boz
Whooops. That guy from the Pistons. Jeff Boschee.
Jeff George

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44326 on: August 19, 2015, 04:27:36 PM »
so clean cut is clean shaven with short hair.  has to be both, neither is sufficient on it's own.

feel like its also a personality and body language thing

do you have an example of a clean shaven, short-haired but not clean cut person?  trout was mentioned, but his clean cutness was disputed.
Jim McMahon
The Boz
Whooops. That guy from the Pistons. Jeff Boschee.
Jeff George
David Beckham

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44327 on: August 19, 2015, 04:27:57 PM »
so clean cut is clean shaven with short hair.  has to be both, neither is sufficient on it's own.

feel like its also a personality and body language thing

do you have an example of a clean shaven, short-haired but not clean cut person?  trout was mentioned, but his clean cutness was disputed.
Jim McMahon
The Boz
Whooops. That guy from the Pistons. Jeff Boschee.
Jeff George
David Beckham
Detlef Schrempf

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44328 on: August 19, 2015, 04:28:31 PM »
guys stop. everyone except rage against the mckee and sys gets it

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44329 on: August 19, 2015, 04:28:50 PM »
so clean cut is clean shaven with short hair.  has to be both, neither is sufficient on it's own.

feel like its also a personality and body language thing

do you have an example of a clean shaven, short-haired but not clean cut person?  trout was mentioned, but his clean cutness was disputed.
Jim McMahon
The Boz
Whooops. That guy from the Pistons. Jeff Boschee.
Jeff George
David Beckham
Detlef Schrempf
Bryan McCabe

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44330 on: August 19, 2015, 04:29:41 PM »
so clean cut is clean shaven with short hair.  has to be both, neither is sufficient on it's own.

feel like its also a personality and body language thing

do you have an example of a clean shaven, short-haired but not clean cut person?  trout was mentioned, but his clean cutness was disputed.
Jim McMahon
The Boz
Whooops. That guy from the Pistons. Jeff Boschee.
Jeff George
David Beckham
Detlef Schrempf
Bryan McCabe
John Cena

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44331 on: August 19, 2015, 04:29:54 PM »
guys stop. everyone except rage against the mckee and sys gets it
Ok.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44332 on: August 19, 2015, 04:32:51 PM »
but great work SDK. the Boz. i mean really spot on there

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44333 on: August 19, 2015, 04:34:23 PM »
i don't think my brain could handle it if we only played 161 games
I'm sorry mocat but this seems like a very real possibility. 

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44334 on: August 19, 2015, 04:34:50 PM »
161 is fine with me. It basically means we run ruled America

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44335 on: August 19, 2015, 04:36:30 PM »
but great work SDK. the Boz. i mean really spot on there
Thank you. One more then I'm done. Christian Laettner!

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44336 on: August 19, 2015, 04:43:43 PM »
but great work SDK. the Boz. i mean really spot on there
Thank you. One more then I'm done. Christian Laettner!
Marshall Mathers
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44337 on: August 19, 2015, 04:45:27 PM »
It just means you have a neat, respectable appearance.

that makes sense.  clean and groomed in the eyes of a given beholder.  seems like all the given counterexamples have unconventional haircuts, conspicuous tattoos or aren't normally clean.  so you could probably make up a more detailed definition that would fit.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44338 on: August 19, 2015, 04:45:31 PM »
but great work SDK. the Boz. i mean really spot on there
Thank you. One more then I'm done. Christian Laettner!
Marshall Mathers
Awwww crap!

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44339 on: August 19, 2015, 04:49:47 PM »
there is no way i can look back on our record and have it add up to 161, good grief.

hey remember the 2015 kansas city royals* season?

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44340 on: August 19, 2015, 04:54:31 PM »
1 game might be important in the home field race?  :dunno:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44341 on: August 19, 2015, 04:54:47 PM »
after a couple hours there is no more rain. it will just be delayed

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44342 on: August 19, 2015, 04:54:55 PM »
Sounds like an illegal record

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44343 on: August 19, 2015, 04:55:13 PM »
there is no way i can look back on our record and have it add up to 161, good grief.

hey remember the 2015 kansas city royals* season?

just break it up into three 40 game segments and one 41 game segment.  or 15 ten game segments and one 11 game segment.  or eight 20 game segments and one 1 game segment.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44344 on: August 19, 2015, 04:57:03 PM »
1 game might be important in the home field race?  :dunno:

there was a time, not so very long ago, when posters would highlight especially ridiculous posts, by saying: "pffft", or sometimes "pfft".
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44345 on: August 19, 2015, 04:59:19 PM »
just break it up into three 40 game segments and one 41 game segment.  or 15 ten game segments and one 11 game segment.  or eight 20 game segments and one 1 game segment.

7 23-game segments makes way more sense

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40575
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44346 on: August 19, 2015, 05:02:11 PM »
just break it up into three 40 game segments and one 41 game segment.  or 15 ten game segments and one 11 game segment.  or eight 20 game segments and one 1 game segment.

7 23-game segments makes way more sense

the royals are 5-0 so far :surprised:

1: 16-7 W
2: 12-11 W
3: 13-10 W
4: 15-8 W
5: 13-10 W
6: ??? (3-0 so far)
7: ???

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44347 on: August 19, 2015, 05:05:43 PM »
1 game might be important in the home field race?  :dunno:
In the event we end up trailing either NY, Houston, or Tornoto for home field by 1/2 game it doesn't matter since they'd have the season series tie breaker. If we finish 1/2 game up this works out to our advantage.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44348 on: August 19, 2015, 05:08:28 PM »
7 23-game segments makes way more sense

that does make far more sense.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #44349 on: August 19, 2015, 05:10:49 PM »
1: 16-7 W
2: 12-11 W
3: 13-10 W
4: 15-8 W
5: 13-10 W
6: ??? (3-0 so far)
7: ???

man, they were really scuffling in segment two.  i'd love to see the royals really buckle down and get to 17-6 on this sixth segment.  i know, i know, i'm getting greedy with the hot start.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."