j-dub revived this discussion in the chiefs thread, so here's the stats through August:
month era avg/ops runs/game win%
april: 4.58 .263/.747 3.95 .286 <--- average hitting/scoring month + 2nd worst pitching month = 2nd worst win%
may: 4.07 .259/.702 4.18 .536 <--- average hitting/better scoring month + much better pitching month = 2nd best win%
june: 3.95 .266/.711 3.78 .519 <--- worst scoring month + good pitching = winning record & 3rd best win%
july: 5.58 .283/.751 4.65 .269 <--- best hitting and scoring month + worst pitching month = worst win%
aug: 3.30 .263/.703 4.11 .607 <--- average hitting/scoring month + best pitching month = best win%
I'm not saying hitting doesn't matter, I'm saying there is a DIRECT CORRELATION in the data from ERA to win%, almost regardless of offensive performance.
of course pitching is important 1908cat. it's the most important factor for a winning ballclub.
you tried to defend the indefensible jeff francoeur by saying the royals pitching has been worse than the royals hitting.
you didn't make a coherent argument or any damn sense.
of course the pitching is a huge problem. and the same people in charge of putting a rotation together are the same people deciding frenchy should be our RF. that's why it's okay to have a huge problem with both.
the argument was not royals pitching vs hitting, but rather the complete and utter ineptitude of one jeff francoeur, who due to a dumbass contract from a mancrushing dumbass gm, is untradeable, unbenchable (according to our resident dumbasses in charge) and uncuttable. which leaves one of our 25 best players down in AAA.
it's okay to admit both things. frenchy sucks and pitching is the biggest reason we have lost a lot of games.
go ahead 1908cat. try it.