Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5763020 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20450 on: September 04, 2014, 11:42:18 AM »
There isn't "apathy" as shown by most of the reasons cf3 listed. People here are rough ridin' pumped about this team. Games aren't selling out anymore because you can watch the game on tv literally every night in every market. You don't face the decision of going to the game or checking a box score the next day anymore. But the Royals games consistently have the highest rating in prime time KC tv viewing, which is where the owners will make there money on the next tv deal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20451 on: September 04, 2014, 11:53:34 AM »
There isn't "apathy" as shown by most of the reasons cf3 listed. People here are rough ridin' pumped about this team. Games aren't selling out anymore because you can watch the game on tv literally every night in every market. You don't face the decision of going to the game or checking a box score the next day anymore. But the Royals games consistently have the highest rating in prime time KC tv viewing, which is where the owners will make there money on the next tv deal...six years from now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20452 on: September 04, 2014, 11:56:37 AM »
Yeah, our current deal is a problem.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40525
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20453 on: September 04, 2014, 12:06:03 PM »
The Dodgers are averaging 40k, what was that all about?

Edit: 46k

Online joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3819
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20454 on: September 04, 2014, 12:10:44 PM »
I'd like to see a stat in MLB of what portion of attendance comes from people living 30+ miles from the stadium. I would be willing to bet the Royals are top 10 if not top 5. In part because of how far the stadium is from the Johnson County crowd and partly because how much of the fan base is spread out in smaller cities throughout the Midwest.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40525
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20455 on: September 04, 2014, 12:11:20 PM »
I mean I assume meister knew they were #1 when he brought that up, but I don't see what it has to do with MIR's point

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20456 on: September 04, 2014, 12:12:57 PM »
three pages of attendance talk?

off day indeed

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40525
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20457 on: September 04, 2014, 12:13:09 PM »
I'd like to see a stat in MLB of what portion of attendance comes from people living 30+ miles from the stadium. I would be willing to bet the Royals are top 10 if not top 5. In part because of how far the stadium is from the Johnson County crowd and partly because how much of the fan base is spread out in smaller cities throughout the Midwest.

Ok, the rangers are terrible, the stadium is an hour drive from literally everywhere in the metroplex, and yet they are enjoying huge crowds

Online joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3819
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20458 on: September 04, 2014, 12:18:53 PM »
I'd like to see a stat in MLB of what portion of attendance comes from people living 30+ miles from the stadium. I would be willing to bet the Royals are top 10 if not top 5. In part because of how far the stadium is from the Johnson County crowd and partly because how much of the fan base is spread out in smaller cities throughout the Midwest.

Ok, the rangers are terrible, the stadium is an hour drive from literally everywhere in the metroplex, and yet they are enjoying huge crowds

Yea, they're probably top 5 too, but at the same time both Dallas and Ft Worth are bigger than KCK and MO combined

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20459 on: September 04, 2014, 12:20:16 PM »
The Dodgers are averaging 40k, what was that all about?

Edit: 46k

Their crowd yesterday looked abysmal. KC isn't the only playoff team with attendance issues.

Offline slucat

  • GIRL ALERT, GIRL ALERT
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 706
  • This SLU, not the city
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20460 on: September 04, 2014, 12:21:01 PM »
I'd like to see a stat in MLB of what portion of attendance comes from people living 30+ miles from the stadium. I would be willing to bet the Royals are top 10 if not top 5. In part because of how far the stadium is from the Johnson County crowd and partly because how much of the fan base is spread out in smaller cities throughout the Midwest.

Ok, the rangers are terrible, the stadium is an hour drive from literally everywhere in the metroplex, and yet they are enjoying huge crowds

Oh, you mean the 4th largest metro in the US is supporting a baseball team with ticket prices comparable to Royals??

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40525
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20461 on: September 04, 2014, 12:24:46 PM »
I'd like to see a stat in MLB of what portion of attendance comes from people living 30+ miles from the stadium. I would be willing to bet the Royals are top 10 if not top 5. In part because of how far the stadium is from the Johnson County crowd and partly because how much of the fan base is spread out in smaller cities throughout the Midwest.

Ok, the rangers are terrible, the stadium is an hour drive from literally everywhere in the metroplex, and yet they are enjoying huge crowds

Oh, you mean the 4th largest metro in the US is supporting a baseball team with ticket prices comparable to Royals??

Well they are the worst team in the mlb, and have been all year. Yes there are a billion people in dfw, but I think it is more to CF3's point about the season ticket base. The rangers have been in the playoffs for like 8 straight years, and are reaping the rewards now

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20462 on: September 04, 2014, 12:57:24 PM »
30 years of season ticket holder erosion. You don't get 20k nightly walkups anywhere in baseball in the every game on TV era. This is a dumb conversation.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20463 on: September 04, 2014, 01:49:59 PM »
How many homers will Santana hit tonight?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals (#1royal thread)
« Reply #20464 on: September 04, 2014, 02:17:41 PM »
I'm glad that this Royals thread doesn't waste time discussing the postgame comments from a 37 year old relief pitcher who has been on the team for 6 weeks and has pitched about 11 innings. Amirite, SDK???

urite. This is my favorite thread I've ever started.  :cheers:

you'll have noticed the royals' record since this thread has reemerged, i'm sure.


 :blank:

You'll notice my absence from this thread during that streak.  :blank:

 :blank:

 :tongue:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20465 on: September 04, 2014, 02:37:36 PM »
slimz, have I told you I like your new avatar? I like that you thought "Hey, my pic is a dog with sunglasses, time for a change. I'm going to go with a dog with glasses." Its a good pic.

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20466 on: September 04, 2014, 02:48:34 PM »
slimz, have I told you I like your new avatar? I like that you thought "Hey, my pic is a dog with sunglasses, time for a change. I'm going to go with a dog with glasses." Its a good pic.

T-Y, CF3. I thought that little guy fit the new profile verbiage a bit better. They remind me to try to be a friendly poster, which is a good reminder to me on days like today.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20467 on: September 04, 2014, 02:54:34 PM »
Guys watch me get this thread back on track

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20468 on: September 04, 2014, 02:55:46 PM »
Here is an awesome picture of Rusty Kuntz. Check it out dudes!


Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20469 on: September 04, 2014, 03:23:09 PM »
Guys watch me get this thread back on track

 :thumbs:

Online joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3819
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20470 on: September 04, 2014, 03:39:05 PM »
Here is an awesome picture of Rusty Kuntz. Check it out dudes!



Should just say here is a picture of Rusty Kuntz, the awesome is implied

Online joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3819
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20471 on: September 04, 2014, 03:44:20 PM »
List time

Things more awesome than Rusty Kuntz:
1. Alex Gordon's booty
2. Salvy's smile
3. Rusty Kuntz's hair
4. Yea right, there's no 4

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20472 on: September 04, 2014, 04:09:25 PM »
kind of related to attendance, but show of hands - who thinks the Royals likely go 2-4 on the next roadtrip, dropping out of first place in the division?

prob also explains the attendance.  loser franchise, loser fan mentality.  always waiting for the other shoe to drop.  In my life, I've never seen this team win.  I'm expecting this team to fail.     

 

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20473 on: September 04, 2014, 04:16:09 PM »
 :sdeek:

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #20474 on: September 04, 2014, 04:25:11 PM »
 :buh-bye:

GOD DAMMIT!