Author Topic: The SLTHst of SLTH  (Read 15358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
The SLTHst of SLTH
« on: February 10, 2010, 10:14:50 PM »
Doc in his painfully earnest drawl--- "Don't forget, we came here to win tonight."  No crap?  On your home court?  Nice reminder Doc.

The tropes from Franklin about "no reward" for their outstanding effort, seeing practice where they "were breaking down that zone just exactly the way Doc wanted."

Then the end, just no athletes, no ability to make a play and win a game.

Good God, the SLTH fog of war was so thick, I got Wooly flashbacks.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2010, 10:17:29 PM »
I'm glad they lost.  Baylor might be our best win in a couple weeks when Texas keeps spiraling. 
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline Prince McJunkins

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 453
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2010, 10:17:53 PM »
"We didn't get enough stops."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2010, 10:19:57 PM »
"We didn't get enough stops."

DOC!  YOU WERE HELD TO 53 POINTS!

Offline TBL

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2010, 10:26:27 PM »
"We didn't get enough stops."

DOC!  YOU WERE HELD TO 53 POINTS!

Not to mention 4-21 from behind the arc and 18-57 inside.   :barf:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20659
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2010, 10:29:22 PM »
at least 5-7 of those were wide open from running good offense.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55978
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2010, 10:36:06 PM »
why do all these idiot coaches insist on running the shot clock down to nothing so there's only 15 on the game clock?  WTF does that accomplish?

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2010, 10:37:17 PM »
why do all these idiot coaches insist on running the shot clock down to nothing so there's only 15 on the game clock?  WTF does that accomplish?

You can't leave time on the clock!  It is a sure fire way to lose!   :runaway:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2010, 10:38:33 PM »
why do all these idiot coaches insist on running the shot clock down to nothing so there's only 15 on the game clock?  WTF does that accomplish?

Because they don't just want a "good" shot, they want the "best" shot.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2010, 10:40:09 PM »
why do all these idiot coaches insist on running the shot clock down to nothing so there's only 15 on the game clock?  WTF does that accomplish?

apparently, they believe that their team only needs 5 seconds to get a shot, but that the opposing team needs at least 15.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22458
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2010, 10:45:01 PM »
Making the defense work to guard for a longer period of time increases the probability that they'll make a mistake and allow the SLTH offense to take advantage with an easy basket.

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2014
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2010, 10:47:04 PM »
Making the defense work to guard for a longer period of time increases the probability that they'll make a mistake and allow the SLTH offense to take advantage with an easy basket.

Holding the ball 35 feet from the basket doesn't force defenses to do all that much work.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22458
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2010, 10:51:39 PM »
Making the defense work to guard for a longer period of time increases the probability that they'll make a mistake and allow the SLTH offense to take advantage with an easy basket.

Holding the ball 35 feet from the basket doesn't force defenses to do all that much work.

I've never seen this other than at the end of a half.

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2014
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2010, 10:53:40 PM »
Making the defense work to guard for a longer period of time increases the probability that they'll make a mistake and allow the SLTH offense to take advantage with an easy basket.

Holding the ball 35 feet from the basket doesn't force defenses to do all that much work.

I've never seen this other than at the end of a half.

Which was MICat's point.  Running the game clock down is dumb when your opponent is going to have time for a possesion.  Pat Knight and Doc Saddler have done it on consecutive nights.

Dumb.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22458
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2010, 11:02:07 PM »
Oh, my mistake.  In that case, a reason would be wanting to give your opponent less time to have the ball in their possession.  That's reasonable enough.

Offline A-Lishious

  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 208
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2010, 11:18:52 PM »
Arnt they getting some downtown arena thingy?


I mean.... why?  :blindfold:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55978
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2010, 06:23:56 AM »
Oh, my mistake.  In that case, a reason would be wanting to give your opponent less time to have the ball in their possession.  That's reasonable enough.

This actually happened twice this week in Big 12 games - TT and NU sat on the ball for 25-30 seconds before trying to do anything, and neither one got the ball close to the rim.  They both gave the other team about 15 seconds of game clock - OU got 2 shots, and BU won the game.  Replacing a turnover/horrible shot on offense with a decent shot in those situations would have been more valuable than shaving 10 seconds on the game clock to get it down to 15.  They hurt themselves a lot more than they hurt the other team.

Offline TracyCat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 23
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2010, 07:01:07 AM »
Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is a slth?  A sloth?   :confused:

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22458
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2010, 07:24:59 AM »
Oh, my mistake.  In that case, a reason would be wanting to give your opponent less time to have the ball in their possession.  That's reasonable enough.

This actually happened twice this week in Big 12 games - TT and NU sat on the ball for 25-30 seconds before trying to do anything, and neither one got the ball close to the rim.  They both gave the other team about 15 seconds of game clock - OU got 2 shots, and BU won the game.  Replacing a turnover/horrible shot on offense with a decent shot in those situations would have been more valuable than shaving 10 seconds on the game clock to get it down to 15.  They hurt themselves a lot more than they hurt the other team.

Does it make sense if you think your team is inferior?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88698
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2010, 07:37:19 AM »
Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is a slth?  A sloth?   :confused:

Solid Long Term Hire.  It was started when everyone threw fits when we hired Huggins and then Martin.  Everyone said we should have gotten a Solid Long Term Hire like McDermott, Sadler, BzD, etc. 

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7177
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2010, 07:41:32 AM »
Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is a slth?  A sloth?   :confused:
Solid, long term hire. It's a negative thing about coaches that have no real ability to become consistently good. We had ours with Wooly. Best examples of SLTHs in the conference right now are probably McNeck, Bzdlkwerzck, and The Doctor.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline TracyCat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 23
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2010, 07:50:08 AM »
Thanks guys. 

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47979
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2010, 08:06:44 AM »
Oh, my mistake.  In that case, a reason would be wanting to give your opponent less time to have the ball in their possession.  That's reasonable enough.

This actually happened twice this week in Big 12 games - TT and NU sat on the ball for 25-30 seconds before trying to do anything, and neither one got the ball close to the rim.  They both gave the other team about 15 seconds of game clock - OU got 2 shots, and BU won the game.  Replacing a turnover/horrible shot on offense with a decent shot in those situations would have been more valuable than shaving 10 seconds on the game clock to get it down to 15.  They hurt themselves a lot more than they hurt the other team.

NU holding the ball was only a mistake because the other team won, otherwise it would have been a great coaching move.  i mean, the turnover/horrible shot was only a horrible shot because it didn't go in.  i was taught this a few weeks ago on ksufans.com.

what would you want Doc to have them do, run a three man weave for an open lay up?   :lol:   :lol:  :lol:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Bookcat

  • Guest
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2010, 08:09:12 AM »
Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is a slth?  A sloth?   :confused:

Solid Long Term Hire.  It was started when everyone threw fits when we hired Huggins and then Martin.  Everyone said we should have gotten a Solid Long Term Hire like McDermott, Sadler, BzD, etc. 

wait up. everyone? count me off the list.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88698
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The SLTHst of SLTH
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2010, 08:14:05 AM »
Maybe this is a dumb question, but what is a slth?  A sloth?   :confused:

Solid Long Term Hire.  It was started when everyone threw fits when we hired Huggins and then Martin.  Everyone said we should have gotten a Solid Long Term Hire like McDermott, Sadler, BzD, etc. 

wait up. everyone? count me off the list.

When I say everyone I mean everyone but us.....us meaning elite message boarders (and you)