Author Topic: How about Sprads  (Read 21269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2010, 12:17:27 PM »
If SD was right, Dom would be our PG this year.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #26 on: November 17, 2010, 12:24:29 PM »
If SD was right, Dom would be our PG this year.

Dom air balled too many.

Offline skycat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1143
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #27 on: November 17, 2010, 12:32:57 PM »
Spradling played 27 minutes at PG yesterday and had a grand total of 1 assist.   :zzz:

a JYC assist is when you clank one off the rim/backboard and we board it and either put it back or get fouled.

QFT. I counted 8 JYCAs from Spaulding yesterday!

Dummy. It's spelled Sprauldiling. Get it right!

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2010, 12:33:23 PM »
Quote
his assist/to ratio is infinity/0
To be fair, the team shot like .25 the first half when he got most of his minutes. Of course, that could be a sign he isn't effective running the offense.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #29 on: November 17, 2010, 12:42:33 PM »
Solid, steady, mistake free. Basically everything you don't expect from a FR in the 2nd game of his career against a veteran, physical Top 25 team.

As others have alluded to, the offensive creativity isn't there (yet?) but he's shaping up nicely to be a" take care of the ball, take what the defense gives you" backup PG this year.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2010, 12:43:59 PM »
Solid, steady, mistake free. Basically everything you don't expect from a FR in the 2nd game of his career against a veteran, physical Top 25 team.

As others have alluded to, the offensive creativity isn't there (yet?) but he's shaping up nicely to be a" take care of the ball, take what the defense gives you" backup PG this year.

That one he went coast to coast on was pretty nifty, though.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2010, 12:56:23 PM »
It WAS nifty, filing that one under "take what the defense gives you", he attacked across half court, nobody picked him up, he did a great job of recognizing that, attacked into the lane and had a good(tougher than it looks) finish with the finger roll. Good job Sprads  :thumbsup:

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #32 on: November 17, 2010, 01:15:03 PM »
Solid, steady, mistake free. Basically everything you don't expect from a FR in the 2nd game of his career against a veteran, physical Top 25 team.

As others have alluded to, the offensive creativity isn't there (yet?) but he's shaping up nicely to be a" take care of the ball, take what the defense gives you" backup PG this year.

That one he went coast to coast on was pretty nifty, though.

I almost crapped my pants after that.  The kid literally did not rattle and then took control when we needed it.  Sure he didn't even score in double figures, but those were some solid minutes from someone I didn't even expect to log minutes this early.
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2010, 01:33:32 PM »
Spradling played 27 minutes at PG yesterday and had a grand total of 1 assist.   :zzz:

This continues to prove my point that the statistic assist is as useless (if not more useless) than the statistic "error" in MLB.  The other SD is dead on in his analysis re: offensive boards.

especially for the point guard position  :lol:

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #34 on: November 17, 2010, 01:57:15 PM »

Did a great job of eating minutes and not screwing up until we could get Pullen back, which is nice.  But it's not anything to get too excited about.


Spradling's performance was impressive.  No question about it.  I guess I wasn't necessarily excited or ready to compare him to Havlicek, but that dude deserves some credit. 
-played great defense.  aside from the charges, two of which were legit, he played very solid defense.  He's quicker than I anticpiated and moves well laterally.  He was consistently guarding senior, experienced guards.  At times, he was guarding one of the best guards in the ACC.  And with few exceptions, he held his own. 
-played good offense.  he may not have Jason  Kidd out there, but it's obvious he handles the ball exceptionally well (zero turnovers), he gets the ball up and down the court quickly, and he distributes the ball evenly, smoothly.  i.e. doesn't pick up the ball at the top of the key and wait for the wings to pop open.  That may not impress you, but to me, it is very positive that this true freshman handles the ball well, is smart with the ball, and doesn't turn it over. 
-intangibles.  I think it's very impressive that the dude did all of the foregoing things on a National stage, in the most high profile non-con home game in our school's history, against an ACC team loaded with seniors. 

 :bball: 

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #35 on: November 17, 2010, 01:59:27 PM »
Sprualding's performance only goes to show recruiting rankings and stars don't mean anything and we have nothing to worry in recruiting  :driving:

Offline Bill Clarahan

  • agricultural related person
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 722
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #36 on: November 17, 2010, 02:04:10 PM »
Sprads is meeting my expectations, and I bet he exceeds them.  I feel like quite a few of you owe me an appology about Sprads.  Those are my feelings, and I am entitled to them.

Gottlieb noticing the racism:

Quote
Jeff Allen's intentional foul in the first half on Tuesday seemed to adversely affect the officials, who over officiated and called charge after charge despite the fact that Will Spradling rarely had his feet set. (The charge on Erick Green was an embarrassing mistake by the official.)

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation/tag/_/name/college-hoops-tip-off-marathon


I don't remember being embarassed by the call, how bout you guise? :dunno:

Also do you think Will is a relative of , Judge Smails

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #37 on: November 17, 2010, 02:05:07 PM »
saw this posted...take it fwiw...

Quote
3 star because of two reasons...He’s white. This isn’t an ignorant comment either; at least two HS bball evaluators said he would be rated 5 stars if he was playing ball in a more known area and was black. I guess it’s like the Toby Gerhart syndrome. Sad, but it’s the prejudice 99% of people have.

 :users:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38014
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #38 on: November 17, 2010, 02:11:36 PM »
saw this posted...take it fwiw...

Quote
3 star because of two reasons...He’s white. This isn’t an ignorant comment either; at least two HS bball evaluators said he would be rated 5 stars if he was playing ball in a more known area and was black. I guess it’s like the Toby Gerhart syndrome. Sad, but it’s the prejudice 99% of people have.

 :users:

Where was that posted? Caste basketball?

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #39 on: November 17, 2010, 02:11:40 PM »

I don't remember being embarassed by the call, how bout you guise? :dunno:

Also do you think Will is a relative of , Judge Smails

Those refs sucked.  No getting around it.  But, every single one of Sprauldings charges was legit compared to the Delaney charge they called against Pullen for #3.  

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #40 on: November 17, 2010, 02:14:08 PM »

I don't remember being embarassed by the call, how bout you guise? :dunno:

Also do you think Will is a relative of , Judge Smails

Those refs sucked.  No getting around it.  But, every single one of Sprauldings charges was legit compared to the Delaney charge they called against Pullen for #3.  

No.

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #41 on: November 17, 2010, 02:17:10 PM »

I don't remember being embarassed by the call, how bout you guise? :dunno:

Also do you think Will is a relative of , Judge Smails

Those refs sucked.  No getting around it.  But, every single one of Sprauldings charges was legit compared to the Delaney charge they called against Pullen for #3.  

First charge was bogus.
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #42 on: November 17, 2010, 02:23:09 PM »

No.

Yes. 


one of them was certainly questionable.  But again, compared to the other garbage they were calling (ie Pullen's charge), I have no problem with the call.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #43 on: November 17, 2010, 02:24:24 PM »
Pullen got away with one or two in the 2nd half though, IMO.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #44 on: November 17, 2010, 02:27:38 PM »
Welcome to the world of biased officiating.  All-Americans get away with crap that other player's don't.  See every KU game in the OOD since it was built. 

Offline AzCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 966
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #45 on: November 17, 2010, 03:10:23 PM »
Does it really surprise anyone here that an ACC officiating crew whistled three quick fouls on a Big XII team's star player when said Big XII team was playing an ACC squad?   :users:

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #46 on: November 17, 2010, 03:14:27 PM »
Shocker: Jack Harry "just felt really good" when Spaulding was on the floor.  :opcat:

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #47 on: November 17, 2010, 03:20:59 PM »
Spradling played 27 minutes at PG yesterday and had a grand total of 1 assist.   :zzz:

This continues to prove my point that the statistic assist is as useless (if not more useless) than the statistic "error" in MLB.  The other SD is dead on in his analysis re: offensive boards.

especially for the point guard position  :lol:

exactly, PG is to PF as SS is to RF the more opportunities for "assists" the less useful the statistic

A stat based on who had the ball before someone else who does something good with it is not very helpful, unless you're John Stockton reneging a contract.  Especially when you consider our bigs do nothing but miss layups and draw fouls (and then miss FT's).

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #48 on: November 17, 2010, 03:57:06 PM »
Spradling played 27 minutes at PG yesterday and had a grand total of 1 assist.   :zzz:

This continues to prove my point that the statistic assist is as useless (if not more useless) than the statistic "error" in MLB.  The other SD is dead on in his analysis re: offensive boards.

especially for the point guard position  :lol:

exactly, PG is to PF as SS is to RF the more opportunities for "assists" the less useful the statistic

A stat based on who had the ball before someone else who does something good with it is not very helpful, unless you're John Stockton reneging a contract.  Especially when you consider our bigs do nothing but miss layups and draw fouls (and then miss FT's).

translation please?  anyone?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: How about Sprads
« Reply #49 on: November 17, 2010, 03:58:26 PM »
Sugar dick is such a stats nerd.  :blush: