Author Topic: Science  (Read 8778 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Science
« on: October 27, 2010, 08:38:26 PM »
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/weird/Scientists-May-Have-IDd-Liberal-Gene-105917218.html

The science is in. The debate is over.  Liberals are proven to be retards.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Paul Moscow

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1844
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2010, 08:58:22 PM »
"It is the crucial interaction of two factors -- the genetic predisposition and the environmental condition of having many friends in adolescence -- that is associated with being more liberal,” according to the study.

Annnnnnd Sanchez is 0 for 2.


Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2010, 09:19:54 PM »
"It is the crucial interaction of two factors -- the genetic predisposition and the environmental condition of having many friends in adolescence -- that is associated with being more liberal,” according to the study.

Annnnnnd Sanchez is 0 for 2.



You take yourself far too seriously.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2010, 09:52:08 PM »
It sounds like medication might help if it is a problem with dopamine production or receptors. There may be hope and change for liberals after all.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Science
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2010, 03:50:47 PM »
Quote
Abnormal dopamine receptor signaling and dopaminergic nerve function is implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders.[1]  Thus, dopamine receptors are common neurologic drug targets; antipsychotics are often dopamine receptor antagonists while psychostimulants are typically indirect agonists of dopamine receptors.

hmmm....I wonder who counted up their friends for them? :crazyperson:  I'm guessing "socially active" means f*ck anything and everything that will consent


I'd personally like to see a study on why liberals are less attractive than normal people.


Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2010, 03:55:57 PM »

I'd personally like to see a study on why liberals are less attractive than normal people.


Never been to California, huh?

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Science
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2010, 04:02:38 PM »

I'd personally like to see a study on why liberals are less attractive than normal people.


Never been to California, huh?

I used to live in L.A. ("hated it" gay guy vioce), place is a cess pool

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88586
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2010, 05:42:51 PM »
Why does it make you conservative if you don't have very many friends growing up?  Would really like to read more about this. 

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2010, 06:06:46 PM »
are you trying to tell me that my ideology is the result of being a more evolved, better social being?

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2010, 06:51:35 PM »
Why does it make you conservative if you don't have very many friends growing up?  Would really like to read more about this. 

Spent more time studying.  Got better grades.  Learned more about American History.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2010, 07:43:02 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2010, 08:36:55 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

Bad things happen when you think.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2010, 08:39:21 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

Bad things happen when you think.



Oh ok... so all of those people who want intelligent design to be taught alongside evolution are just joking then? 


 :confused:

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2010, 08:47:20 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2010, 08:50:58 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Science
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2010, 08:53:56 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

Epic Fail

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2010, 08:57:14 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

And if you think liberal means the same thing after about 1900, then you may want to go back and retake American history, starting in the first grade, and this time don't use your public school textbook.  I'm sure Alexander Hamilton would be all over wanting another huge stimulus. 

Stick to football, you know it better.  :lol:

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2010, 08:59:02 PM »
GB came out on radio the other day defending intelligent design. He's officially an absolute fraud

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2010, 09:00:34 PM »
Which is the same reason I couldn't vote for Huckabee. Like the guy and all, but I couldn't vote for a guy that believes the earth is 7k years old

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #19 on: October 28, 2010, 09:01:38 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

And if you think liberal means the same thing after about 1900, then you may want to go back and retake American history, starting in the first grade, and this time don't use your public school textbook.  I'm sure Alexander Hamilton would be all over wanting another huge stimulus. 

Stick to football, you know it better.  :lol:



I take it you don't know the true definition of liberalism?  Want to give it another shot?

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #20 on: October 28, 2010, 09:04:53 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

And if you think liberal means the same thing after about 1900, then you may want to go back and retake American history, starting in the first grade, and this time don't use your public school textbook.  I'm sure Alexander Hamilton would be all over wanting another huge stimulus. 

Stick to football, you know it better.  :lol:



I take it you don't know the true definition of liberalism?  Want to give it another shot?

Yeah, yeah...you're trying to argue that you are the political descendants of the Founders. 

 :bong: :bigtoke:

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Science
« Reply #21 on: October 28, 2010, 09:12:06 PM »
I thought most conservatives were opposed to science?

No, see, I'm coming over from the troglodyte side to relying on science for everything, because current science is the end all be all of knowledge.  Liberals are retards.  The science is in.  The debate is over.


The only thing I took from reading that little write-up was that liberals are more likely to have more friends during adolescence.  Do you even know what liberalism entails, by the way?  Our founding fathers would be considered "liberal" in this day and age by dipsh*ts like yourself.  

And if you think liberal means the same thing after about 1900, then you may want to go back and retake American history, starting in the first grade, and this time don't use your public school textbook.  I'm sure Alexander Hamilton would be all over wanting another huge stimulus. 

Stick to football, you know it better.  :lol:



I take it you don't know the true definition of liberalism?  Want to give it another shot?

This really is one of your worst arguments.   The founding fathers are more akin to the Tea Party (people who want radical change of limited government and liberty, but labeled conservative) than liberals (people with a narrow and highly hypocritical agenda who advocate free thought and "civil liberty" as long as it fits their definition of what's okay to think and do, if it doesn't you will be censured and ridiculed as if King George himself unilaterally declared your actions illegal).

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #22 on: October 28, 2010, 09:17:17 PM »
The United States was founded on liberalism.  Look up Thomas Jefferson and John Locke sometime.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Science
« Reply #23 on: October 28, 2010, 09:28:03 PM »
The United States was founded on liberalism.  Look up Thomas Jefferson and John Locke sometime.

You know nothing.  Citing those two as example of liberals makes your argument even worse.  Jeffersonian Democrats are present day tea party people.  Jefferson pretty much plagiarized Locke so there's that.

You're misunderstanding what it means to be a liberal today vs. 200-300 years ago

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Science
« Reply #24 on: October 28, 2010, 09:32:48 PM »
The United States was founded on liberalism.  Look up Thomas Jefferson and John Locke sometime.

You know nothing.  Citing those two as example of liberals makes your argument even worse.  Jeffersonian Democrats are present day tea party people.  Jefferson pretty much plagiarized Locke so there's that.

You're misunderstanding what it means to be a liberal today vs. 200-300 years ago



Not at all.  The right wing has demonized the term "liberal" to the point that people forget what it truly means.  Modern day liberals are completely in support of expanding individual freedom and equal rights, as well as maintaining a separation of church and state.  As far as Jefferson goes, he modified Locke's theory of "life, liberty, and property" to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."