Author Topic: Obama Policies  (Read 8172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Obama Policies
« on: October 12, 2010, 12:03:15 PM »
When reading and discussing politics recently my conservative breatheren have consistantly voiced their displeasure and concern with his policies.  Most of this discussion seems to revolve around expansion of government and deficit spending and the impending catatstrophe each will generate.  However upon reflection and analysis is it possible that the policies of George W. actually did more to expand the physical size and scope of governmental control and intrusion in to private lives than Obama has.

Consider:

Big Government: It is said that Obama is in support of Big Government but have his actions really done anymore to alter the size or scope of government than those of W?  To me it would seem that the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and passing of No Child Left Behind and Patriot Act increased the size and scope of Government far more than any Obama policy has.  Obamacare that everyone is so afriad of has taken place yet so that expansion can not be counted, and even if it is does not require a creation of any new federal agency to oversee.  The plan simply states that americans must have insurance and companies larger than 50 people must provide insurance.  To me this would be a benefit to the insurance industry and lead to a need for more agents and competition within the insurance industry. 

Deficit Spending: George W inherited a budget surplus and in short order created a substantial deficit that was a hallmark of his presidency.   With a fair amount of money being spent to create agencies, support new legislation, and pursue 2 wars.  In contrast it would seem that much of Obama’s spending has not been on government programs/agencies but to fortify capitalism.  Government Buyouts and loans, a process and precedent started by the Bush presidency, went to corporations that were in dire need of assistance in order to stay afloat.  While much of the ARRA money was paid to civilian contractors to repair, replace, or improve infastructure across the nation.  Also a great deal of increase in spending is tied to increased spending within medicare and unemployment due to the economic recession a reality that Obama did not create.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2010, 12:23:49 PM »
Well I guess if you didn't like Bush, you probably shouldn't like Obama.  Great point!

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2010, 01:49:48 PM »
I don't think you will get any arguments supporting Bush policies. Obama is Bush x10.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2010, 02:40:43 PM »
I know that the perception is that Obama is Bush x10 but is there any fact to back it up?

I am not saying there isn't I am just not sure what it is?

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2010, 04:00:17 PM »
I know that the perception is that Obama is Bush x10 but is there any fact to back it up?

I am not saying there isn't I am just not sure what it is?


Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2010, 08:48:05 AM »
I know that the perception is that Obama is Bush x10 but is there any fact to back it up?

I am not saying there isn't I am just not sure what it is?



BOOM, ROASTED

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2010, 09:39:20 AM »
I never said the deficits that are being incurred are smaller, please read again.

"In contrast it would seem that much of Obama’s spending has not been on government programs/agencies but to fortify capitalism.  Government Buyouts and loans, a process and precedent started by the Bush presidency, went to corporations that were in dire need of assistance in order to stay afloat.  While much of the ARRA money was paid to civilian contractors to repair, replace, or improve infastructure across the nation.  Also a great deal of increase in spending is tied to increased spending within medicare and unemployment due to the economic recession a reality that Obama did not create."

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2010, 11:18:00 AM »
I never said the deficits that are being incurred are smaller, please read again.

"In contrast it would seem that much of Obama’s spending has not been on government programs/agencies but to fortify capitalism."


I'm not really sure what this means; it seems like an oxymoron. It would seem to me the only way to fortify capitalism is to let the weak companies fail so a stronger one can fill the hole in the marketplace, if there really is a need. Artificially propping up a failing company with borrowed money is foolish and has prolonged the pain for many years to come. JMO

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2010, 11:25:21 AM »
i agree however it seems to be a position that was supported by both parties, both presidents, and strategists across the political spectrum. 

Offline mortons toe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2010, 11:39:20 AM »
dicklicky wants to hear "yes, Bush sucked" so he can trot around with his head a little higher after realizing that "the messiah" is a complete  :flush:


oh, and one more thing... the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution were largely jooz! Damn those gulags sounded brutal!  :horrorsurprise:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2010, 12:35:39 PM »
If President Obama were trying to cut taxes, instead of raising taxes on the top 2%, no one from the right wing would give a sh*t about the budget.  Where were all these right wing douchebags when Bush was invading Iraq and setting all-time records for budget deficit? 

Offline mortons toe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2010, 12:47:42 PM »
If President Obama were trying to cut taxes, instead of raising taxes on the top 2%, no one from the right wing would give a sh*t about the budget.  Where were all these right wing douchebags when Bush was invading Iraq and setting all-time records for budget deficit? 
once again, deflect back to Bush. Since BO is, and has been in office for 21 month's now, what do you think about HIS budget deficit records? I mean seriously, he has all of these fantastic economists that claimed the unemployment rate wouldn't go over 8%... reality check... they missed it by 2%! Last time I checked, thats an EPIC fail! So lets hear it...

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2010, 12:48:47 PM »
What, specifically, did Bush spend money on that current Republicans wouldn't if they were in power?  His medicare bill?  Defense?  :dunno:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59521
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2010, 01:14:47 PM »
Democrats have controlled Congress for Five years . .  how many times does that need to be said?

They got elected promising war extraction and fiscal responsibilty.

War Extraction: F-

Fiscal Responsiblity:  F---
« Last Edit: October 13, 2010, 01:17:16 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2010, 01:36:22 PM »
Democrats have controlled Congress for Five years . .  how many times does that need to be said?

They got elected promising war extraction and fiscal responsibilty.

War Extraction: F-

Fiscal Responsiblity:  F---



President Obama is reducing the number of troops in Iraq to around 25,000 in the next year or so.  As far as fiscal responsibility is concerned, typically governments spend money during a recession to increase domestic consumption.  Also, if you want to decrease the budget deficit, you're going to have to raise taxes, which is why President Obama wants to raise taxes on the top 2%.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2010, 02:07:20 PM »
nope already knew Bush sucked

point is he seems to have done much more to increase both the size and scope of spending than Obama

this was not a problem with conservatives at the time but is a big problem now.  why?

(also morton your usage of unprovoked anti-semitism is truly inspiring to the  :opcat: )
« Last Edit: October 13, 2010, 02:10:04 PM by LickNeckey »

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2010, 03:05:20 PM »
If President Obama were trying to cut taxes, instead of raising taxes on the top 2%, no one from the right wing would give a sh*t about the budget.  Where were all these right wing douchebags when Bush was invading Iraq and setting all-time records for budget deficit? 

remember when BO was running for president and said the tax cuts were only for the rich.  now he wants to extend them for everyone but the top 2% because they help the middle-class?  Hilarious contradiction


Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2010, 03:05:48 PM »
Democrats have controlled Congress for Five years . .  how many times does that need to be said?

They got elected promising war extraction and fiscal responsibilty.

War Extraction: F-

Fiscal Responsiblity:  F---



President Obama is reducing the number of troops in Iraq to around 25,000 in the next year or so.  As far as fiscal responsibility is concerned, typically governments spend money during a recession to increase domestic consumption.  Also, if you want to decrease the budget deficit, you're going to have to raise taxes, which is why President Obama wants to raise taxes on the top 2%.

The draw down in Iraq would have happened even if Bush were still in office. The surge worked to put an end to that war, but the same can't be said for Afghanistan at this point.

The government doesn't really have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem. The more revenue they get, the more they will spend.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59521
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2010, 03:07:56 PM »
Democrats have controlled Congress for Five years . .  how many times does that need to be said?

They got elected promising war extraction and fiscal responsibilty.

War Extraction: F-

Fiscal Responsiblity:  F---



President Obama is reducing the number of troops in Iraq to around 25,000 in the next year or so.  As far as fiscal responsibility is concerned, typically governments spend money during a recession to increase domestic consumption.  Also, if you want to decrease the budget deficit, you're going to have to raise taxes, which is why President Obama wants to raise taxes on the top 2%.

War Extraction . . . means leaving totally . . . and most of those troops were transferred to Afghanistan.   In addition it's all about semantics.   We've been over this before . . . they are reducing the number of "combat" troops, but rotating in just as many troops under other guises, even though the majority of them are combat capable and they are still getting combat pay.   Not to mention the private army the State Department is cobbling together . . and that's just Iraq.   There are now more hired guns (contractors) serving in combat roles and running CIA state sanctioned assasination operations, than at any other time in U.S. history.   That's how they are getting by with call it a "reduction" in combat troops, hired mercs.  

The number don't lie . . . the budget deficits have spireled out of control under a Democratic Congress

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2010, 03:54:31 PM »
Obama really has failed to live up to any of his campaign promises.

Close Guantanamo: Nope

Public Health Care: Nope

Bring Home the Troops: Nope

I'm sure there are more on the list.

Let's not forget how horribly he handled the BP oil spill.

It should be really hard for anybody to say that Obama has been a good president to this point and if things don't change soon (no pun intended), it would take a very weak republican candidate for me to vote for reelection.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2010, 06:58:54 PM »
Obama really has failed to live up to any of his campaign promises.

Close Guantanamo: Nope

Public Health Care: Nope

Bring Home the Troops: Nope

I'm sure there are more on the list.

Let's not forget how horribly he handled the BP oil spill.

It should be really hard for anybody to say that Obama has been a good president to this point and if things don't change soon (no pun intended), it would take a very weak republican candidate for me to vote for reelection.



You can thank the Republicans for fighting tooth and nail to keep the Dems from implementing a public health care option.  President Obama is bringing home tens of thousands of troops from Iraq.  President Obama also wanted to close Guantanamo, but the 'Pubs threw a tit fit.   Basically, the Dems are a bunch of pussies that try to compromise with the dumb f*cking 'Pubs instead of sacking up and implementing their own policies 100%.  Like Bill Maher says, Obama needs a little bit of Bush in him.  Screw what all these right wing douchebags say... do your own thing and grab the White House by the balls. 

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2010, 07:21:02 PM »
Obama really has failed to live up to any of his campaign promises.

Close Guantanamo: Nope

Public Health Care: Nope

Bring Home the Troops: Nope

I'm sure there are more on the list.

Let's not forget how horribly he handled the BP oil spill.

It should be really hard for anybody to say that Obama has been a good president to this point and if things don't change soon (no pun intended), it would take a very weak republican candidate for me to vote for reelection.



You can thank the Republicans for fighting tooth and nail to keep the Dems from implementing a public health care option.  President Obama is bringing home tens of thousands of troops from Iraq.  President Obama also wanted to close Guantanamo, but the 'Pubs threw a tit fit.   Basically, the Dems are a bunch of pussies that try to compromise with the dumb f*cking 'Pubs instead of sacking up and implementing their own policies 100%.  Like Bill Maher says, Obama needs a little bit of Bush in him.  Screw what all these right wing douchebags say... do your own thing and grab the White House by the balls. 

 :facepalm:  Dems had complete control of both house and senate! Filibuster proof! It was his own party that stopped him, then he had to buy votes from his own party to get that pile of crap passed. It's a crap bill and everyone knows it.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2010, 08:13:52 PM »
Obama really has failed to live up to any of his campaign promises.

Close Guantanamo: Nope

Public Health Care: Nope

Bring Home the Troops: Nope

I'm sure there are more on the list.

Let's not forget how horribly he handled the BP oil spill.

It should be really hard for anybody to say that Obama has been a good president to this point and if things don't change soon (no pun intended), it would take a very weak republican candidate for me to vote for reelection.



You can thank the Republicans for fighting tooth and nail to keep the Dems from implementing a public health care option.  President Obama is bringing home tens of thousands of troops from Iraq.  President Obama also wanted to close Guantanamo, but the 'Pubs threw a tit fit.   Basically, the Dems are a bunch of pussies that try to compromise with the dumb f*cking 'Pubs instead of sacking up and implementing their own policies 100%.  Like Bill Maher says, Obama needs a little bit of Bush in him.  Screw what all these right wing douchebags say... do your own thing and grab the White House by the balls. 

You can't be serious

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59521
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2010, 08:44:10 PM »
Bullshit on closing Gitmo . . . Obama's executive order wasn't worth the paper it was written on.   Now they're engaged in the largest state sanctioned assassination campaign in U.S. history.  Dwarfing the Phoenix Program started under LBJ during the Vietnam War.   

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59521
    • View Profile
Re: Obama Policies
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2010, 08:46:28 PM »
Democratic strategy meetings talking point #1:  DO NOT TALK ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE BILL SAVING MONEY!!