Poll

A line has been drawn in the sand....

Bill
26 (52%)
Slashahan
24 (48%)

Total Members Voted: 48

Voting closed: October 02, 2010, 06:42:39 AM

Author Topic: Carson Coffman Master Thread  (Read 23414 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #75 on: September 25, 2010, 09:50:17 PM »
He's a gamer.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #76 on: September 25, 2010, 09:57:20 PM »
11/22 189 yards 1 TD 1 INT  7 carries for 10 yards 1 TD    AND A WIN

If you hold this one high, you are going to have to carry the next one too no matter how bad it smells.

I'm sure that you will agree that the benchmark for CCQ should be the performance of a first round draft pick against the next defense he will see

Jake Locker 4/20 71 YDS  1TD 2 INT

This is totally going to be a talking point.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: **Official Thank You Carsy for Winning Us the Game Thread**
« Reply #77 on: September 25, 2010, 09:58:19 PM »
Queso once again proves his haters wrong.  It doesn't have to be pretty, it just has to be.

He had a good fourth quarter and hit a few key passes when it counted.  Gotta give him credit for that.

Would have liked to see that kind of production in the first three quarters, but whatever.

Isn't it hilarious how low our standards/expectations are for the QB position?

I'm content if the QB play isn't so bad that I want to jab at my eyes with a fork.

If the fourth quarter wouldn't have happened, I may have done that.  But Carson saved the day.

I know. My Coffman hate was at cat-scratch fever pitch at halftime. But when the guy actually completes 3 passes to wide open receivers, we completely forgive him.

couple of those could have been completed by any kid who has ever been associated with the game of football.   No props for a shitty player doing his job every once in a while.

I'm just happy when he does it. (See prior reference to hilariously low expectations)
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38085
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #78 on: September 25, 2010, 10:01:52 PM »
11/22 189 yards 1 TD 1 INT  7 carries for 10 yards 1 TD    AND A WIN

If you hold this one high, you are going to have to carry the next one too no matter how bad it smells.

I'm sure that you will agree that the benchmark for CCQ should be the performance of a first round draft pick against the next defense he will see

Jake Locker 4/20 71 YDS  1TD 2 INT

This is totally going to be a talking point.

Read directly above your post in this string.  It already is.  Team CCQ has this crap printed off and posted on the wall.  Daris already emailed this line to CCQ for inspiration. 


Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #79 on: September 25, 2010, 10:04:42 PM »
11/22 189 yards 1 TD 1 INT  7 carries for 10 yards 1 TD    AND A WIN

If you hold this one high, you are going to have to carry the next one too no matter how bad it smells.

I'm sure that you will agree that the benchmark for CCQ should be the performance of a first round draft pick against the next defense he will see

Jake Locker 4/20 71 YDS  1TD 2 INT

This is totally going to be a talking point.

Read directly above your post in this string.  It already is.  Team CCQ has this crap printed off and posted on the wall.  Daris already emailed this line to CCQ for inspiration. 

Goddamn. Daris is a rough ridin' dynamo. I bet he's got that crap laminated on pleasantly colored paper, too.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #80 on: September 25, 2010, 10:07:49 PM »
Yes, 1 TD running and 1 TD throwing is a good game for CCQ.

A good game for queso is a ho-hum day for an actual D1A QB... soooo, he still played like $h!t. Dude had what 4 plays that gave us some kind of production? He sucks donkey dicks.


The question was did Carson have a good game, not did he play as well as some other QB.  Don't be such a dumbass.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #81 on: September 25, 2010, 10:09:34 PM »
The question was Did Carson have a good game, not did he play a good game by his own standards.  Don't be such a dumbass.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #82 on: September 25, 2010, 10:11:08 PM »
The question was Did Carson have a good game, not did he play a good game by his own standards.  Don't be such a dumbass.

So playing out of his mind and looking like a legit BCS QB would have only been a "good game?"  Don't be such a dumbass.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #83 on: September 25, 2010, 10:14:15 PM »
Buncha dumbasses in this thread.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18070
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #85 on: September 25, 2010, 10:17:36 PM »
The question was Did Carson have a good game, not did he play a good game by his own standards.  Don't be such a dumbass.

Look Hemms, is it alright if I call you that?  Thanks.  Hemms, if you're waiting for CCQ to be a phenomenal player to be happy, you are going de a depressed sonuvabitch by the end of the season.  If you are waiting for Snyder to bench him, you are going to be a depressed sonuvabitch.  If you think we have a better QB hidden somewhere, you are a delusional sonuvabitch.  

Its Carsy's team and its not changing anytime soon.  Hop aboard and enjoy the ride Hemms!

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Hemmy
« Reply #86 on: September 25, 2010, 10:28:20 PM »
Things I would like to see from Carson:  Not closing his eyes and chucking the football 30 yards down field into double/triple coverage.

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #87 on: September 25, 2010, 11:03:15 PM »
carson sucks. but it isn't really fun to bag on it 24/7.

today was fun.

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #88 on: September 25, 2010, 11:06:01 PM »
Trent Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl team.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: **Official Thank You Carsy for Winning Us the Game Thread**
« Reply #89 on: September 25, 2010, 11:20:24 PM »
The touchdown pass was absolutely perfect.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #90 on: September 25, 2010, 11:31:20 PM »
Trent Dilfer was the starting QB on a Super Bowl team.

He was an average to below average NFL QB, not a sack of crap QB

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #91 on: September 25, 2010, 11:33:02 PM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of crap qb

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #92 on: September 25, 2010, 11:36:02 PM »
Actually, I would say we are 1-3.  The fact that I can't tell if our backups actually know what sport they are playing doesn't make CC a better player

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #93 on: September 26, 2010, 01:08:33 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense
« Last Edit: September 26, 2010, 01:11:18 AM by swish1 »

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #94 on: September 26, 2010, 01:20:18 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's shitty day.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #95 on: September 26, 2010, 01:25:43 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's fecesty day.

so how are we 3-1 without him?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #96 on: September 26, 2010, 01:28:33 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's fecesty day.

so how are we 3-1 without him?

He was saying we lose today's game. I disagree with him, and think that we lose today's game, the UCLA game, and the Iowa State game without him, though DT actually played well in those games, so it's possible we might have won.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #97 on: September 26, 2010, 01:35:07 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's fecesty day.

so how are we 3-1 without him?

He was saying we lose today's game. I disagree with him, and think that we lose today's game, the UCLA game, and the Iowa State game without him, though DT actually played well in those games, so it's possible we might have won.

exactly his argument makes no sense.

we won this game because we are a better team than ucf.  it just took carson 3 quarters to pull his head out of his ass.  he, coffman, is the reason DT was shut down by a good rush defense.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #98 on: September 26, 2010, 01:44:52 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's fecesty day.

so how are we 3-1 without him?

He was saying we lose today's game. I disagree with him, and think that we lose today's game, the UCLA game, and the Iowa State game without him, though DT actually played well in those games, so it's possible we might have won.

exactly his argument makes no sense.

we won this game because we are a better team than ucf.  it just took carson 3 quarters to pull his head out of his ass.  he, coffman, is the reason DT was shut down by a good rush defense.

I saw nothing in this game to make me think that we are actually a better team than UCF. Believe me, DT would have still been shut down had Coffman been benched. All Carson Coffman did was win the game when it was on the line, something I don't believe any other QB on our roster could do.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
« Reply #99 on: September 26, 2010, 01:56:56 AM »
we're 3-1 without that sack of feces qb

this argument makes no sense.  hes the reason we were so terrible up until the 4th quarter today.  also do we win 3 games with lamur at qb?  hes terrible, our other qb's are terrible.

it seems clear that for the rest of the year we will have to set up the run by proving we can actually throw the football.

i suppose i should have said when we play a team with a decent defense

Your argument makes no sense. In fact, I have no idea what you are trying to argue. Coffman has started 4 games. We are 4-0. We won this game because of Coffman's 4th quarter performance and in spite of DT's fecesty day.

so how are we 3-1 without him?

He was saying we lose today's game. I disagree with him, and think that we lose today's game, the UCLA game, and the Iowa State game without him, though DT actually played well in those games, so it's possible we might have won.

exactly his argument makes no sense.

we won this game because we are a better team than ucf.  it just took carson 3 quarters to pull his head out of his ass.  he, coffman, is the reason DT was shut down by a good rush defense.

I saw nothing in this game to make me think that we are actually a better team than UCF. Believe me, DT would have still been shut down had Coffman been benched. All Carson Coffman did was win the game when it was on the line, something I don't believe any other QB on our roster could do.

im not saying that coffman isnt the best option for qb.  but that doesnt change the fact that our terrible qb play, ie coffman, is the reason DT was shut down.  i agree he finally came through at the end after 3 terrible quarters.  other than stopping the run game UCF was far from impressive in any aspect of the game since it has been clear from day 1 we cant stop the run.