I want to do a thorough breakdown of this game, but I think it is important to address the biggest BBS talking point about our defense, defensive pressure and the play of our front 7. With all these comments about our lack of pressure; you may want to think about the strengths of our opponent.
When game planning for ISU it really comes down to this: would you rather take a guy like Arnaud, who is not a great thrower and who does not have a bunch of play making wide receivers, and let him sit in the pocket and try to beat you with his arm OR would you rather send lots of pressure, knowing eventually you will have containment issues, and then let Arnaud beat you with his legs. It was pretty clear to me we were willing to take our chances with Arnaud throwing the ball, knowing eventually ISU would make a mistake, and our defensive line did not play overly aggressive for this reason, besides being undersized. It seems pretty clear to me we were willing to rush 4, knowing that Harold would make a play or two, but more importantly keeping Arnaud in front of us and not letting him have a bunch of big runs.
Granted, our defense of the zone read wasn't the greatest, and we do have tackling issues. But again, we are way undersized and in this game and ISU's big oline did a great job staying on us in their zone run blocking; this will continue to an issue all year. But overall we did a good job not giving up running lanes outside of the tackles which in this game was the biggest threat against us, both with Arnaud and Robinson. I'd like to see the 4+ YPC by our opponents much lower than that, but we are going to have a defense all year that is going to have to give up something to take other team's strengths away b/c of our limitations in talent and in depth. Yesterday we gave up too many yards in the running game; much of that is correctable with better tackling, some of that is not b/c we just don't have the depth or talent to address it completely.