0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Building presumes that the "monster" part will continue.Nothing about going 2-9 in the last 11 games says "building" or "monster".
Now just tell me that UCLA >>> Georgia Tech, and your invalidation/powerespect session will be complete.
Quote from: BMWJhawk on September 18, 2010, 05:47:40 PMNow just tell me that UCLA >>> Georgia Tech, and your invalidation/powerespect session will be complete.UCLA >>> Georgia Tech
17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchart
Quote from: kcpowercat on September 19, 2010, 12:26:45 PM17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchartGotta be one of the older teams in the conference.
KU's football team is young and inexperienced, with freshman and sophomores all across the board. They've got talent, as we saw against Georgia Tech. They're just going through a learning process right now.
Quote from: Limestone on September 19, 2010, 12:28:47 PMQuote from: kcpowercat on September 19, 2010, 12:26:45 PM17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchartGotta be one of the older teams in the conference.lol at the BMW factcheck. Poor guy should stick to making predictions that won't come true rather than straight up lying.
Quote from: 06wildcat on September 19, 2010, 03:11:57 PMQuote from: Limestone on September 19, 2010, 12:28:47 PMQuote from: kcpowercat on September 19, 2010, 12:26:45 PM17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchartGotta be one of the older teams in the conference.lol at the BMW factcheck. Poor guy should stick to making predictions that won't come true rather than straight up lying.That depth chart is from August 19th. Here are the freshman/sophomores that start for KU as of last Friday against So. Miss:QB - Webb (Fr.)HB - Sims (Fr.)WR - McDouglad (So.)WR - Beshears (So.)G - Marrongelli (So.)T - Hawkinson (So.)S - L. Smith (So.)S - Terry (Fr.)CB - Patmon (Fr.)DE - Young (Fr.)Then there's a host of juniors on both sides of the ball who are just now 1st on the depth chart after waiting in the wings for a couple years. KU is a pretty young team, especially at the skill positions. That's why the offense has struggled at times, while the defense has had to carry the team. KU's defense has been good enough this year to be 2-1, possibly even 3-0.
Quote from: BMWJhawk on September 19, 2010, 05:46:29 PMQuote from: 06wildcat on September 19, 2010, 03:11:57 PMQuote from: Limestone on September 19, 2010, 12:28:47 PMQuote from: kcpowercat on September 19, 2010, 12:26:45 PM17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchartGotta be one of the older teams in the conference.lol at the BMW factcheck. Poor guy should stick to making predictions that won't come true rather than straight up lying.That depth chart is from August 19th. Here are the freshman/sophomores that start for KU as of last Friday against So. Miss:QB - Webb (Fr.)HB - Sims (Fr.)WR - McDouglad (So.)WR - Beshears (So.)G - Marrongelli (So.)T - Hawkinson (So.)S - L. Smith (So.)S - Terry (Fr.)CB - Patmon (Fr.)DE - Young (Fr.)Then there's a host of juniors on both sides of the ball who are just now 1st on the depth chart after waiting in the wings for a couple years. KU is a pretty young team, especially at the skill positions. That's why the offense has struggled at times, while the defense has had to carry the team. KU's defense has been good enough this year to be 2-1, possibly even 3-0.Having players who suck too much to get PT until they are a JR is not a good thing.
Quote from: Limestone on September 19, 2010, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on September 19, 2010, 05:46:29 PMQuote from: 06wildcat on September 19, 2010, 03:11:57 PMQuote from: Limestone on September 19, 2010, 12:28:47 PMQuote from: kcpowercat on September 19, 2010, 12:26:45 PM17 of 22 starters are upper classmen???http://www.kuathletics.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/kan/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/depthchartGotta be one of the older teams in the conference.lol at the BMW factcheck. Poor guy should stick to making predictions that won't come true rather than straight up lying.That depth chart is from August 19th. Here are the freshman/sophomores that start for KU as of last Friday against So. Miss:QB - Webb (Fr.)HB - Sims (Fr.)WR - McDouglad (So.)WR - Beshears (So.)G - Marrongelli (So.)T - Hawkinson (So.)S - L. Smith (So.)S - Terry (Fr.)CB - Patmon (Fr.)DE - Young (Fr.)Then there's a host of juniors on both sides of the ball who are just now 1st on the depth chart after waiting in the wings for a couple years. KU is a pretty young team, especially at the skill positions. That's why the offense has struggled at times, while the defense has had to carry the team. KU's defense has been good enough this year to be 2-1, possibly even 3-0.Having players who suck too much to get PT until they are a JR is not a good thing.also known as "tetuan syndrome"