Author Topic: biggest football (general) tard talking point?  (Read 7949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« on: September 05, 2010, 07:15:10 PM »

1) the starting qb and how much he sucks.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2) ?
3) ?
4) ?
5) ?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

stunz

  • Guest
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2010, 07:33:55 PM »
i dont think its Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  but it gets old.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2010, 08:06:00 PM »
You know what isn't a powerespect talking point? Talking about wanting the sound system at the Bill to be raised to the top notch. :cool:

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10548
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2010, 08:19:18 PM »
You know what isn't a powerespect talking point? Talking about wanting the sound system at the Bill to be raised to the top notch. :cool:

Yeah, I couldn't hear what that one guy was saying to "pump up" the team before the cat train video.

yoga-like_abana

  • Guest
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2010, 08:47:37 PM »
He was very good the first quarter. Then he was sacked on the first play of the second quarter, then fumbled on the next series. And it was the Carson we have come to know and loathe. Unaware, unsure, basically just one big gigantic floppy dildo.

Offline Bill Clarahan

  • agricultural related person
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 722
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2010, 08:52:25 PM »
I thought the tards were talking about loud and randy language around their family at an afternoon sporting event after hours of imbibing. :surprised:

 :cheers:   :drink:

 :barf:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2010, 09:09:22 PM »
I thought the tards were talking about loud and randy language around their family at an afternoon sporting event after hours of imbibing. :surprised:

 :cheers:   :drink:

 :barf:

This is prob a good # 3 for the list. Maybe #2 maybe #4 or something. good call clarahan.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22457
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2010, 09:13:37 PM »
bitching about cc right now is crap posting. if you're doing it, you have nothing insightful to say. i think the collective iq of this site is about half of ksufans' in its heyday. just a bunch of crap topics right now.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30954
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2010, 09:22:54 PM »
bitching about cc right now is feces posting. if you're doing it, you have nothing insightful to say. i think the collective iq of this site is about half of ksufans' in its heyday. just a bunch of feces topics right now.

Is it still OK to bitch about Snyder's QB recruiting, 'cause that's all I got?

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2010, 09:51:24 PM »
carson sucks incredibly, and just because every other qb sucks doesn't make carson sucking hurt my emaw less.  and when he does suck, regardless of whether I expect him to suck or not, I'm going to fracking point it out.  i mean, everyone last year was like, "hey carson is the best we have" and then gregory comes in and sucks less.  the offense scored points for one reason and one reason only:  Daniel fracking Thomas.  Just because carson was the one that was turning around and handing it off to Thomas doesn't make him a "good game manager".  It only highlights what an incredibly sh*tty player he is, because just think about how good this offense would be if he wasn't so f'ing worthless. 

so, in summary.  Carson can eat a dick and so can everyone else who pretends like they really want carson at qb.  It's practically like convincing yourself you weren't raped.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22457
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2010, 09:52:18 PM »
bitching about cc right now is feces posting. if you're doing it, you have nothing insightful to say. i think the collective iq of this site is about half of ksufans' in its heyday. just a bunch of feces topics right now.

Is it still OK to bitch about Snyder's QB recruiting, 'cause that's all I got?

it's been beaten to death. the ucla dropped pass point was good. i hope you didn't listen to the 'ifs and buts' losers.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2010, 09:41:33 AM »
carson sucks incredibly, and just because every other qb sucks doesn't make carson sucking hurt my emaw less.  and when he does suck, regardless of whether I expect him to suck or not, I'm going to fracking point it out.  i mean, everyone last year was like, "hey carson is the best we have" and then gregory comes in and sucks less.  the offense scored points for one reason and one reason only:  Daniel fracking Thomas.  Just because carson was the one that was turning around and handing it off to Thomas doesn't make him a "good game manager".  It only highlights what an incredibly sh*tty player he is, because just think about how good this offense would be if he wasn't so f'ing worthless. 

so, in summary.  Carson can eat a dick and so can everyone else who pretends like they really want carson at qb.  It's practically like convincing yourself you weren't raped.

Yeah. Grant Gregory didn't suck less. Grant gregory and pretty much the same surrounding cast could only score 32 points combined over the last three games last year. Carson just scored 31 in 3.5 quarters of play and I still have to deal with retards talking about how gregory was better. It's like you are just trying to eff with me because what you just wrote is so incredibly stupid I think you must be kidding.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2010, 09:48:30 AM »
It was great to see the old uniforms back. Brandon Harold is going to be beast now that he has good coaching. We'll be difficult to defend with our size and talent at WR. Snyder coached up another diamond in the rough with Powell. Hrebec makes up for his lack of athleticism with grit and guile, which is exactly what you expect from a Snyder-coached team. The whatever side needs more bathrooms.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2010, 09:50:25 AM »
You know what isn't a powerespect talking point? Talking about wanting the sound system at the Bill to be raised to the top notch. :cool:

Yeah, I couldn't hear what that one guy was saying to "pump up" the team before the cat train video.

Yep, its like there are only speakers in the SEZ

Offline Andy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2010, 01:37:46 AM »
You know what isn't a powerespect talking point? Talking about wanting the sound system at the Bill to be raised to the top notch. :cool:

Yeah, I couldn't hear what that one guy was saying to "pump up" the team before the cat train video.

Yep, its like there are only speakers in the SEZ

the sound system is completely useless if u sit in the upper deck.  all the music sounds washed out, as though the speakers were blown out.  whatever though, pretty much the norm at the Bill.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2010, 01:51:56 AM »
carson sucks incredibly, and just because every other qb sucks doesn't make carson sucking hurt my emaw less.  and when he does suck, regardless of whether I expect him to suck or not, I'm going to fracking point it out.  i mean, everyone last year was like, "hey carson is the best we have" and then gregory comes in and sucks less.  the offense scored points for one reason and one reason only:  Daniel fracking Thomas.  Just because carson was the one that was turning around and handing it off to Thomas doesn't make him a "good game manager".  It only highlights what an incredibly sh*tty player he is, because just think about how good this offense would be if he wasn't so f'ing worthless. 

so, in summary.  Carson can eat a dick and so can everyone else who pretends like they really want carson at qb.  It's practically like convincing yourself you weren't raped.

I am 100% on Team Carson now, and not because Colin sucked when he was in, also a tarded talking point, what the hell did anyone expect? 

Adjust your expectations.  I'm looking for a guy who knows the playbook, and won't make rough ridin' brutal stupid mistakes.  If his worst problem is that he takes sacks then fine I don't care.  Kevin Prince was 9/26 with 2 picks.  DO NOT WANT.

None of our quarterbacks resemble Joe Flacco.  At some point people are going to evaluate the QB situation for what it is and not what they want it to be.  Alabama won the national championship with a shitty QB, you mean to tell me we can't win 6-7 games with one?

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2010, 05:38:32 AM »
carson sucks incredibly, and just because every other qb sucks doesn't make carson sucking hurt my emaw less.  and when he does suck, regardless of whether I expect him to suck or not, I'm going to fracking point it out.  i mean, everyone last year was like, "hey carson is the best we have" and then gregory comes in and sucks less.  the offense scored points for one reason and one reason only:  Daniel fracking Thomas.  Just because carson was the one that was turning around and handing it off to Thomas doesn't make him a "good game manager".  It only highlights what an incredibly sh*tty player he is, because just think about how good this offense would be if he wasn't so f'ing worthless. 

so, in summary.  Carson can eat a dick and so can everyone else who pretends like they really want carson at qb.  It's practically like convincing yourself you weren't raped.

Yeah. Grant Gregory didn't suck less. Grant gregory and pretty much the same surrounding cast could only score 32 points combined over the last three games last year. Carson just scored 31 in 3.5 quarters of play and I still have to deal with retards talking about how gregory was better. It's like you are just trying to shazbot! with me because what you just wrote is so incredibly stupid I think you must be kidding.

gmafb about carson scoring any points.  Daniel Thomas scored points, carson handed off to him.  Gregory was less Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), which doesn' t make him not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), just less Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  But this is like an argument I got into with fatty about Dylan vs. Evridge, in the end both were terrible, it's fracking pointless.  just don't tell me that carson doesn't suck or isn't a f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) at QB.  He is and you acting like he's not only reinforces a battered wife syndrome that is running rampant around this site.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22457
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2010, 05:55:46 AM »
this is dt's offense.  as long as cc does what he's asked to do, he's done his job.  when and only when he hasn't will this no longer be a crap topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59699
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2010, 08:14:47 AM »
Our Running Backs accounted for 83% of K-State's total Net Offense last Saturday . . .  using the net numbers, Carsy Coffman was the "playmaker" for 61 yards of total offense in 69 offensive snaps with Carsy in as QB, that's .88 offensive yards per snap directly related to the QB position.

But like I said, if we can get Carsy anywhere close to the K-State QB that OB himself compared him to on his radio show last Thursday, we'll all take that.   





   

 



Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2010, 08:55:57 AM »
carson sucks incredibly, and just because every other qb sucks doesn't make carson sucking hurt my emaw less.  and when he does suck, regardless of whether I expect him to suck or not, I'm going to fracking point it out.  i mean, everyone last year was like, "hey carson is the best we have" and then gregory comes in and sucks less.  the offense scored points for one reason and one reason only:  Daniel fracking Thomas.  Just because carson was the one that was turning around and handing it off to Thomas doesn't make him a "good game manager".  It only highlights what an incredibly sh*tty player he is, because just think about how good this offense would be if he wasn't so f'ing worthless. 

so, in summary.  Carson can eat a dick and so can everyone else who pretends like they really want carson at qb.  It's practically like convincing yourself you weren't raped.

Yeah. Grant Gregory didn't suck less. Grant gregory and pretty much the same surrounding cast could only score 32 points combined over the last three games last year. Carson just scored 31 in 3.5 quarters of play and I still have to deal with retards talking about how gregory was better. It's like you are just trying to shazbot! with me because what you just wrote is so incredibly stupid I think you must be kidding.

gmafb about carson scoring any points.  Daniel Thomas scored points, carson handed off to him.  Gregory was less Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), which doesn' t make him not Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), just less Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  But this is like an argument I got into with fatty about Dylan vs. Evridge, in the end both were terrible, it's fracking pointless.  just don't tell me that carson doesn't suck or isn't a f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) at QB.  He is and you acting like he's not only reinforces a battered wife syndrome that is running rampant around this site.


gregory did suck just as hard and the fact that you choose to ignore every bit of statistical evidence that proves it makes me kind of lol. "hey, i'm catzacker and i'm going to have an opinion on something and never change it even though it's completely wrong."

thomas was on the team last year as well, you know? if he is so good and gregory was so much better than coffman, then why did the offense only put up 17 on a 1-7 big12 record ku at home? why did they only manage four field goals and 12 points at home against a missouri team that gave up 40 to baylor the week before and 39 to kansas two weeks after? why did etc, etc, etc? banks did make that great catch and run in the iowa state game though and lamur did block that extra point so yeah, maybe gregory was really good.

in the end though, you are right...they both suck. i'm just so over the top annoyed by twenty years of having to listen to tards scream "put in beasley" when bishop was having a bad game or "put in roberson" when beasley was having a bad game or "put in _______" and so on and so forth. now the tard mantra is "crap fellas, if we just had one armed all american 32 yr old grant gregory this year everything would be gold. we'd win the north!"

« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 09:42:15 AM by Rick Daris »

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2010, 09:17:47 AM »
Our Running Backs accounted for 83% of K-State's total Net Offense last Saturday . . .  using the net numbers, Carsy Coffman was the "playmaker" for 61 yards of total offense in 69 offensive snaps with Carsy in as QB, that's .88 offensive yards per snap directly related to the QB position.

But like I said, if we can get Carsy anywhere close to the K-State QB that OB himself compared him to on his radio show last Thursday, we'll all take that.   


Um yeah that's the point, he isn't needed to be a playmaker.  We won right?  Pretty sure I can find 6 defenses on the schedule worse than UCLAs.  He made one horrible mistake and it cost 7 points, we just need less of that.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59699
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2010, 09:39:01 AM »
Our Running Backs accounted for 83% of K-State's total Net Offense last Saturday . . .  using the net numbers, Carsy Coffman was the "playmaker" for 61 yards of total offense in 69 offensive snaps with Carsy in as QB, that's .88 offensive yards per snap directly related to the QB position.

But like I said, if we can get Carsy anywhere close to the K-State QB that OB himself compared him to on his radio show last Thursday, we'll all take that.   


Um yeah that's the point, he isn't needed to be a playmaker.  We won right?  Pretty sure I can find 6 defenses on the schedule worse than UCLAs.  He made one horrible mistake and it cost 7 points, we just need less of that.

Um . . . where are these 6 worse defenses??   I'll give you Missouri State, who else?? 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38018
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #22 on: September 07, 2010, 09:42:15 AM »
Our Running Backs accounted for 83% of K-State's total Net Offense last Saturday . . .  using the net numbers, Carsy Coffman was the "playmaker" for 61 yards of total offense in 69 offensive snaps with Carsy in as QB, that's .88 offensive yards per snap directly related to the QB position.

But like I said, if we can get Carsy anywhere close to the K-State QB that OB himself compared him to on his radio show last Thursday, we'll all take that.   


Um yeah that's the point, he isn't needed to be a playmaker.  We won right?  Pretty sure I can find 6 defenses on the schedule worse than UCLAs.  He made one horrible mistake and it cost 7 points, we just need less of that.

Um . . . where are these 6 worse defenses??   I'll give you Missouri State, who else?? 

Missouri State
North Texas
Kansas
Colorado
(maybe) UCF
Iowa State
Baylor

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #23 on: September 07, 2010, 09:55:49 AM »
Our Running Backs accounted for 83% of K-State's total Net Offense last Saturday . . .  using the net numbers, Carsy Coffman was the "playmaker" for 61 yards of total offense in 69 offensive snaps with Carsy in as QB, that's .88 offensive yards per snap directly related to the QB position.

But like I said, if we can get Carsy anywhere close to the K-State QB that OB himself compared him to on his radio show last Thursday, we'll all take that.   


Um yeah that's the point, he isn't needed to be a playmaker.  We won right?  Pretty sure I can find 6 defenses on the schedule worse than UCLAs.  He made one horrible mistake and it cost 7 points, we just need less of that.

Um . . . where are these 6 worse defenses??   I'll give you Missouri State, who else?? 

Missouri State
North Texas
Kansas
Colorado
(maybe) UCF
Iowa State
Baylor

Bingo.

As long as Carson doesn't lose games for us, I DGAF about his skills or lack thereof.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59699
    • View Profile
Re: biggest football (general) tard talking point?
« Reply #24 on: September 07, 2010, 09:58:24 AM »
Doubtful on UCF, and several others like Iowa State will be up there. 

Like I said (about 8 times now) if Carsy can be a slightly watered down version of Brian Kavanaugh who doesn't throw INT's and doesn't fumble we could win 6 or 7 games.   Had they actually recruited a semi decent JC dual threat QB, we might be looking at 8 maybe 9 wins.