Author Topic: is this old news?  (Read 9398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2010, 07:37:09 AM »

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2010, 07:39:08 AM »
with crap non con and playing thursday nights it looks like this guy won't have to be bothered by watching crap football on Saturdays for the next few years  :gocho:

more time for EPL, La Liga, Seria A, & Bundesliga  :excited:

Offline broXcore

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
  • cats
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #27 on: August 03, 2010, 08:43:08 AM »
with crap non con and playing thursday nights it looks like this guy won't have to be bothered by watching crap football on Saturdays for the next few years  :gocho:

more time for EPL, La Liga, Seria A, & Bundesliga  :excited:
:pbj:

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #28 on: August 03, 2010, 09:09:19 AM »
MIR is taking dumb-dumb pills on this one.  If there is only one thing you take away from the DOD, it's that not only the fact that you can win at a high level scheduling cupcakes in the non-con, but rather that it's a necessary condition to sustain the level of perceived performance that assists in recruiting and fan interest in the post season.

Who gives a crap if your drive from Mound City is less enjoyable when you go watch the Cats play Directional U.?  Skip the crap non-con games and save your dollars for a bowl trip.

Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a difficult non-con is speculative, at best.  Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a weak non-con is based on proven history and rationale expectations for our future.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2010, 09:22:13 AM »
MIR is taking dumb-dumb pills on this one.  If there is only one thing you take away from the DOD, it's that not only the fact that you can win at a high level scheduling cupcakes in the non-con, but rather that it's a necessary condition to sustain the level of perceived performance that assists in recruiting and fan interest in the post season.

Who gives a crap if your drive from Mound City is less enjoyable when you go watch the Cats play Directional U.?  Skip the crap non-con games and save your dollars for a bowl trip.

Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a difficult non-con is speculative, at best.  Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a weak non-con is based on proven history and rationale expectations for our future.

 :lol:

People forget that starting next year, we're playing OU, UT, OSU, ATM, Tech, and Baylor every year.  Starting the season 3-0 against crap schools is the ONLY way we're making bowl games, because then all we've got to do is manage 3 wins against ku, isu, and bu. 

Even assuming that OB coaches them up again and we're playing at a high level, our perceived strength of schedule won't hurt because of 3 crap schools when we're playing OU and UT.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #30 on: August 03, 2010, 09:28:07 AM »
No crap, our conference schedule is going to be nuts....we'll have plenty of "marquee" home games every year with this conference schedule.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #31 on: August 03, 2010, 09:41:58 AM »
I wonder how they are going to handle OU and UT scheduling....they have the ability to make sure that no one has to play both of them on the road in the same year.  I wonder if they'll do that?

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #32 on: August 03, 2010, 09:49:02 AM »
Bryce's debut will be incredible.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #33 on: August 03, 2010, 10:20:30 AM »
MIR is taking dumb-dumb pills on this one.  If there is only one thing you take away from the DOD, it's that not only the fact that you can win at a high level scheduling cupcakes in the non-con, but rather that it's a necessary condition to sustain the level of perceived performance that assists in recruiting and fan interest in the post season.

Who gives a crap if your drive from Mound City is less enjoyable when you go watch the Cats play Directional U.?  Skip the crap non-con games and save your dollars for a bowl trip.

Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a difficult non-con is speculative, at best.  Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a weak non-con is based on proven history and rationale expectations for our future.

QFT

In my mind, Mangino's work at KU proved the superiority of the cupcake OOC once and for all.  As a fan, I wish we could have 1 big non con a year but it is hard to argue with the DoD and YoD. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59562
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #34 on: August 03, 2010, 10:28:48 AM »
Still would like to see a BCS name show up on the OOC now and again . . . it won't hurt a thing.

But I do agree that us playing Oregon and Miami in the same year was probably pretty dumb scheduling. 


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #35 on: August 03, 2010, 10:33:05 AM »
MIR is taking dumb-dumb pills on this one.  If there is only one thing you take away from the DOD, it's that not only the fact that you can win at a high level scheduling cupcakes in the non-con, but rather that it's a necessary condition to sustain the level of perceived performance that assists in recruiting and fan interest in the post season.

Who gives a crap if your drive from Mound City is less enjoyable when you go watch the Cats play Directional U.?  Skip the crap non-con games and save your dollars for a bowl trip.

Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a difficult non-con is speculative, at best.  Arguing that KSU is better off scheduling a weak non-con is based on proven history and rationale expectations for our future.

QFT

In my mind, Mangino's work at KU proved the superiority of the cupcake OOC once and for all.  As a fan, I wish we could have 1 big non con a year but it is hard to argue with the DoD and YoD. 

just let the 1 big non con a year happen at the bowl game


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline DILLIGAF

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #36 on: August 03, 2010, 11:00:09 AM »
I'm not sure if Snyder is a genius or if the people who don't understand his scheduling are just very Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)?   :users:

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #37 on: August 03, 2010, 11:01:36 AM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #38 on: August 03, 2010, 11:03:43 AM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #39 on: August 03, 2010, 11:07:03 AM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

+1

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #40 on: August 03, 2010, 11:07:21 AM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

almost as humorous as people thinking 6 win bowl seasons can be used as a recruiting tool and 2 weeks of extra practice time can turn crap into shinola.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #41 on: August 03, 2010, 12:10:53 PM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

almost as humorous as people thinking 6 win bowl seasons can be used as a recruiting tool and 2 weeks of extra practice time can turn crap into shinola.

 :curse:

It DOES help recruiting.  Look, when you say "we have been to a bowl every year for X years in a row," it is much more compelling than saying "hey, we went to a bowl a couple years back, but we play a super tough non-con schedule."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #42 on: August 03, 2010, 12:22:51 PM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

almost as humorous as people thinking 6 win bowl seasons can be used as a recruiting tool and 2 weeks of extra practice time can turn crap into shinola.

 :curse:

It DOES help recruiting.  Look, when you say "we have been to a bowl every year for X years in a row," it is much more compelling than saying "hey, we went to a bowl a couple years back, but we play a super tough non-con schedule."

"You've probably seen us in nationally televised non-con games against some big time teams the last few years getting our asses whipped.  That could be you son."

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #43 on: August 03, 2010, 12:24:32 PM »
Why do we need it anymore anyway?  We already got Chris Harper to come back home.


Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #44 on: August 03, 2010, 01:05:14 PM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

almost as humorous as people thinking 6 win bowl seasons can be used as a recruiting tool and 2 weeks of extra practice time can turn crap into shinola.

 :curse:

It DOES help recruiting.  Look, when you say "we have been to a bowl every year for X years in a row," it is much more compelling than saying "hey, we went to a bowl a couple years back, but we play a super tough non-con schedule."

it's irrelevant in the hands of WRSOAT

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #45 on: August 03, 2010, 01:15:37 PM »
Didn't they do away with Strength of Schedule factor in the BCS rankings? So what does it matter, other than for fans wanting to see a big name, if we beat up 3 cupcakes? Would much prefer 3-0 start against crap Scum U. over 2-1 start and being able to say, "Yeah but at least that loss was against Oregon."

lol at us worrying about BCS rankings to begin with

almost as humorous as people thinking 6 win bowl seasons can be used as a recruiting tool and 2 weeks of extra practice time can turn crap into shinola.

 :curse:

It DOES help recruiting.  Look, when you say "we have been to a bowl every year for X years in a row," it is much more compelling than saying "hey, we went to a bowl a couple years back, but we play a super tough non-con schedule."

it's irrelevant in the hands of WRSOAT

On this we agree.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #46 on: August 04, 2010, 04:14:33 PM »
Still would like to see a BCS name show up on the OOC now and again . . . it won't hurt a thing.

But I do agree that us playing Oregon and Miami in the same year was probably pretty dumb scheduling. 



I'd be cool playing BCS names if those names happen to be akin to Northwestern, Indiana, Washington State etc. etc.  Otherwise, there simply isn't any good reason (until we're back in national title hunts ( :lol: )) to play any team that we might lose to. 

Two FCS teams is dumb scheduling, see last year, but one FCS team plus 2 gimme FBS games is just about perfect.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline jrod_06

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #47 on: August 04, 2010, 06:27:40 PM »
If anybody is watching, their getting ready to make fun of us on college football live about this. ESPN2....
 :combofan:

Offline PandaXpanda

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1294
  • "is it too soon after 9/11 to be wearing pleats?"
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #48 on: August 04, 2010, 07:57:54 PM »
If anybody is watching, their getting ready to make fun of us on college football live about this. ESPN2....
 :combofan:

saw this earlier on sportscenter.  all things considered,  they actually let us off pretty easy.
aren't you glad it wasn't you? - g.h.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: is this old news?
« Reply #49 on: August 04, 2010, 08:44:47 PM »
If anybody is watching, their getting ready to make fun of us on college football live about this. ESPN2....
 :combofan:

Man, that takes me back.  Having ESPN make fun of us for our week schedule is like taking a time machine to the DOD.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]