Author Topic: CHIEFS (Read 2155018 times)

kitten_mittons · « **Reply #250 on:** November 19, 2010, 09:08:22 AM »

Did Nike win the contract from Reebok for next year?

jtksu · « **Reply #251 on:** November 19, 2010, 01:49:06 PM »

2012.

jtksu · « **Reply #252 on:** November 19, 2010, 01:51:27 PM »

Some of the new uniforms look pretty good. The Broncos' are very nice. Kinda curious is the actual uniforms will look like that though. Seems like there is some histroy with a lot of the uniforms and some would be against changing them.

jtksu · « **Reply #253 on:** November 19, 2010, 01:57:41 PM »

Well I'm a rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). Didn't realize they were just fan made representations. Still hope they change the Vikings uniforms though.

Trim · « **Reply #254 on:** November 20, 2010, 09:57:43 AM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 19, 2010, 01:57:41 PM

Well I'm a rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

Winters · « **Reply #255 on:** November 21, 2010, 09:49:13 AM »

If we don't win today

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #256 on:** November 21, 2010, 09:59:38 AM »

I suspect the 2010 KC Chiefs have jumped the shark, we'll find out today . . . maybe SaulTopekaCat can update us from his Iphone from CameroHead.

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #257 on:** November 21, 2010, 11:16:00 AM »

we should beat the crap out of them.

jtksu · « **Reply #258 on:** November 21, 2010, 12:18:08 PM »

Cassel had 484 yds of total offense last week. Which one of you tards was bitching about how much he sucks?

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #259 on:** November 21, 2010, 12:39:36 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 12:18:08 PM

Cassel had 484 yds of total offense last week. Which one of you tards was bitching about how much he sucks?

i'm a cassel fan but last week was a bunch of garbage yards.

jtksu · « **Reply #260 on:** November 21, 2010, 12:53:45 PM »

I could pretty much give a eff less about the Chiefs or Cassel but 484 yds is a ton of yards.

Pendergast · « **Reply #261 on:** November 21, 2010, 08:14:22 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 12:53:45 PM

I could pretty much give a eff less about the Chiefs or Cassel but 484 yds is a ton of yards.

Stats are useless without the context of the actual game. If you didn't watch it then GTFO.

jtksu · « **Reply #262 on:** November 21, 2010, 08:17:29 PM »

I actually did watch a portion of that game. If a dude throws for 450+ yds against an NFL defense, they dude had a hell of a game. The "context" of those yards doesn't matter. It's not like the Broncos threw in their "meaningless yds" defense. Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

jtksu · « **Reply #263 on:** November 21, 2010, 08:19:07 PM »

Was the context of his yds meaningful today? How does one know when the context of yds is meaningful? If they will be meaningless yards, should you bring a back-up in so your starter doesn't get injuried throwing all those meaningless passes?

Pendergast · « **Reply #264 on:** November 21, 2010, 10:13:53 PM »

JFC. Look up garbage time after you're done jacking off to stats. Wash your hands. Get back to me.

jtksu · « **Reply #265 on:** November 21, 2010, 10:43:03 PM »

450 passing yards in garbage time? That doesn't seem possible.

Pendergast · « **Reply #266 on:** November 21, 2010, 10:51:06 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 10:43:03 PM

450 passing yards in garbage time? That doesn't seem possible.

Didn't watch the game did you? It was over after the first quarter, if not before.

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #267 on:** November 21, 2010, 10:51:57 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 10:43:03 PM

450 passing yards in garbage time? That doesn't seem possible.

we were down 35-0 w/ at least 5 mins left in the first half.

jtksu · « **Reply #268 on:** November 21, 2010, 11:13:30 PM »

So, the Broncos put their back-ups in at that point? Probably played prevent for the entire second half?

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #269 on:** November 21, 2010, 11:16:21 PM »

Quote from: jtksu link=topic=50=94.msg180317#msg180317 date=1290402810

So, the Broncos put their back-ups in at that point? Probably played prevent for the entire second half?

yes.

jtksu · « **Reply #270 on:** November 21, 2010, 11:35:59 PM »

Hard to believe you know that little about football.

kitten_mittons · « **Reply #271 on:** November 22, 2010, 09:04:41 AM »

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 11:35:59 PM

Hard to believe you know that little about football.

They didn't play a PREVENT, but they did play "Keep your man in front of you and tackle him as soon as he catches it." They weren't applying any pressure, and the DB's were just making sure no one got behind them. Yes, they were junk time yards. Notice he couldn't do anything with the football until Denver was up 28-0.

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #272 on:** November 22, 2010, 09:06:59 AM »

Quote from: kitten_mittons on November 22, 2010, 09:04:41 AM

Quote from: jtksu on November 21, 2010, 11:35:59 PM
Hard to believe you know that little about football.

They didn't play a PREVENT, but they did play "Keep your man in front of you and tackle him as soon as he catches it." They weren't applying any pressure, and the DB's were just making sure no one got behind them. Yes, they were junk time yards. Notice he couldn't do anything with the football until Denver was up 28-0.

this is right. i just really didn't care to try and explain it to him.

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #273 on:** November 22, 2010, 09:16:28 AM »

18:4 Touchdown/INT ratio. As long as he isn't turning the ball over. I'm happy.

PandaXpanda · « **Reply #274 on:** November 22, 2010, 09:18:51 AM »

Quote from: WillieWannabe on November 22, 2010, 09:16:28 AM

18:4 Touchdown/INT ratio. As long as he isn't turning the ball over. I'm happy.

same here.