Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2132237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22325 on: February 06, 2023, 01:57:11 PM »
I’m also nervous about their pass rush and pat potentially reaggravating his ankle injury

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59614
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22326 on: February 06, 2023, 02:11:31 PM »
what IRL is the deal with dax sometimes

Dusty old curmudgeon with no joy in his life

My fav aspect is the lack of self-awareness and him wanting to act above "common guy" in each post.

A classic from the second biggest name and experience dropper on this blog, a quarter step below the #fanningbrag   :thumbsup:

I know the resident hyper-sensitive about all things KC clique that weirdly (attempts to) dominate this blog only focuses on the negative.  But if you go back and re-read, I gave Mitch a very nice compliment relative to his actual game description mechanics . . . game situation, down, time, score, personnel and tendencies.  Also before he starts going over the top into the land of ridiculous hyperbole and rehearsed schtick, his description of the in play game action is excellent. 

For example, I think Kevin Harlan is quite good, but some of his description of the actual game action is just pure deception, having you believe that the Chiefs (or whomever) just rattled off a really nice 8 yard run on 1st down only to be told it's 2nd and 8. 









Gen X, and you're #1.5 on the hyper-sensitive  KC guy on this blog.   :thumbsup:


Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22327 on: February 06, 2023, 02:13:07 PM »
Alright, that’s enough everyone

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22328 on: February 06, 2023, 02:17:17 PM »
I normally don't listen to sports talk radio during the week but I'm gonna have it on all week.
Yeah I'm soaking this one in all week.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22329 on: February 06, 2023, 02:18:26 PM »
Alright, that’s enough everyone

my b

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22330 on: February 06, 2023, 02:48:34 PM »
Border patrol convinced me we are getting another Lombardi. I held off on buying too much gear at Rally House yesterday in anticipation of the winners stuff being good.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22331 on: February 06, 2023, 02:52:26 PM »
5 of the last 9 years either Super Bowl or World Series in KC  :love:

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22332 on: February 06, 2023, 03:00:20 PM »
Chiefs overall Super Bowl experience vs Eagles Super Bowl experience gives me confidence.  PHI hardest competition throughout the season was maybe Jacksonville or Dallas?  San Fran would have given them a game with a healthy QB.   

Jalen's running ability scares me a bit.  I assume they will have Bolton spying him most of the game. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22333 on: February 06, 2023, 03:15:03 PM »
benjii, what is Willie Gay's status for Sunday?

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22334 on: February 06, 2023, 03:23:32 PM »
5 of the last 9 years either Super Bowl or World Series in KC  :love:

It's pretty amazing times

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22335 on: February 07, 2023, 11:53:19 AM »
So I’m doing my due diligence here and I look up reddick, this little dude weighs 235 lbs and didn’t have double digit sacks until his fourth year in the league.  Looks to be more of a poor man’s von miller than some uber talented edge rusher.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22336 on: February 07, 2023, 11:54:08 AM »
The only game I've seen him play was against the 49ers and he was pretty badass in that game.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22337 on: February 07, 2023, 11:56:40 AM »
Cmon man!

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22338 on: February 07, 2023, 11:59:39 AM »
He can’t be that effective against the run!

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22339 on: February 07, 2023, 12:00:14 PM »
Hurts seems like a better passer than Lamar but not as quick of a runner.  The key to the game will be the Chiefs defense.  The Chiefs offense will do just fine.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22340 on: February 07, 2023, 12:00:50 PM »
He can’t be that effective against the run!

We're the best at screens, that should slow down the pass rush.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22341 on: February 07, 2023, 12:11:39 PM »
Sneed clearing protocol was mostly expected, but really great important news
:adios:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40548
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22342 on: February 07, 2023, 12:12:23 PM »
i'm a believer that sacks are a QB stat, and the eagles have faced the most laughable group of QB's in NFL history.
it doesn't mean they won't be great vs Mahomes, it just means we have no idea if they're great or not.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22343 on: February 07, 2023, 12:13:58 PM »
I wish @benjii would give us an update on his irl buddy, Willie Gay.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40548
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22344 on: February 07, 2023, 12:15:47 PM »
chiefs players based on my confidence level that they will finish the super bowl:

mahomes - 100%
kelce - 95%
sneed - 95%
gay - 75%
toney - 25%
juju - 25%
hardman - 0%

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22345 on: February 07, 2023, 12:25:28 PM »
Toney will get 3 targets and then he'll injure himself. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40548
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22346 on: February 07, 2023, 12:29:25 PM »
it was v smart of Justin Watson to be ill during the CCG. the eagles might irl forget he exists. he will most likely lead WRs in targets on Sunday   :blindfold:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22347 on: February 07, 2023, 12:49:23 PM »
He better not

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22348 on: February 07, 2023, 01:01:08 PM »
chiefs players based on my confidence level that they will finish the super bowl:

mahomes - 100%
kelce - 95%
sneed - 95%
gay - 75%
toney - 25%
juju - 25%
hardman - 0%

mecole is already out bro

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22349 on: February 07, 2023, 01:06:26 PM »
I will have fear in my heart every 3rd or 4th and 1. We are not good at that d and d.