Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2128159 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22250 on: January 30, 2023, 03:26:16 PM »
great stuff everybody

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22251 on: January 30, 2023, 03:28:37 PM »
Quote
This project contains a Twitter bot that automatically tweets every time there is a punt in an NFL game. It tweets each punt's "Surrender Index" - a completely arbitrary metric created by SB Nation's Jon Bois to quantify how cowardly a punt is.

I'm sure it uses Win Probability or something similar. Yeah a normal game it would have been an awful awful decision, imo. It was fine here.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1145
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22252 on: January 30, 2023, 03:29:00 PM »
Justwin more like Justwhine..

Part of my job is studying and thinking about coaches maximizing their teams' chances of winning, so yes, it is something I focus on and whine about.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22253 on: January 30, 2023, 03:37:05 PM »
Some of you seem to be forgetting that we won the game bc of a personal foul penalty…

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22254 on: January 30, 2023, 03:40:42 PM »
Nah, we won because Cincy pussed out and punted the ball to us on 4th and 15.

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12723
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22255 on: January 30, 2023, 03:51:10 PM »
We won because we are a good football team that is going to the super bowl  :emawkid:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13506
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22256 on: January 30, 2023, 03:52:13 PM »
Justwin more like Justwhine..

Part of my job is studying and thinking about coaches maximizing their teams' chances of winning, so yes, it is something I focus on and whine about.
Study this.. shut your mouth and know your role jabroni!

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22257 on: January 30, 2023, 04:17:50 PM »
you guys check out this comprehensive list of all the top 5 offenses the eagles have faced this year:



Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22258 on: January 30, 2023, 04:20:41 PM »
We have the advantage of having been there before. Patrick remembers what losing felt like, and he wants to be able to go congratulate Jalen on his great season after the game like Tom Brady did to him. We are going to blow these bozos out.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22259 on: January 30, 2023, 04:36:11 PM »
the best offense the eagles faced was detroit (#6 offense in snowbrag) in week 1, and they gave up 35 points

insert charlie murphy laughing gif

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22260 on: January 30, 2023, 04:39:33 PM »
the chiefs SOS isn't even that great, and yet they have faced all these offenses:
#2 buffalo
#3 cincinnati
#3 cincinnati
#7 las vegas
#7 las vegas
#8 san francisco
#9 seattle
#11 jacksonville
#11 jacksonville

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22261 on: January 30, 2023, 04:48:52 PM »
Some of you seem to be forgetting that we won the game bc of a personal foul penalty…

Check out the QBRs.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22262 on: January 30, 2023, 05:00:01 PM »
we have two weeks to kill everybody let's tier the nfl!

tier 1 - CONTENDERS
1. buffalo
2. kansas city
3. cincinnati
4. san francisco
5. philadelphia

tier 2 - ALMOST CONTENDERS
6. dallas
7. miami
8. baltimore

tier 3 - GOOD JOB, GOOD EFFORT
9. jacksonville
10. new england
11. ny jets
12. seattle
13. detroit
14. pittsburgh
15. new orleans
16. ny giants
17. minnesota

tier 4 - PURGATORY
18. tampa bay
19. washington
20. cleveland
21. carolina
22. la chargers
23. tennessee
24. green bay
25. las vegas

tier 5 - SHOULD HAVE JUST TANKED
26. la rams
27. atlanta
28. denver

tier 6 - IRL TANKING
29. arizona
30. chicago
31. indianapolis
32. houston

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22263 on: January 30, 2023, 06:29:16 PM »
Some of you seem to be forgetting that we won the game bc of a personal foul penalty…

You don’t think we could’ve gotten another 10 yards on the sideline and kicked with 2 seconds left? Or thrown it down the field and get a DPI?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22264 on: January 30, 2023, 08:35:06 PM »
we have two weeks to kill everybody let's tier the nfl!

tier 1 - CONTENDERS
1. buffalo
2. kansas city
3. cincinnati
4. san francisco
5. philadelphia

tier 2 - ALMOST CONTENDERS
6. dallas
7. miami
8. baltimore

tier 3 - GOOD JOB, GOOD EFFORT
9. jacksonville
10. new england
11. ny jets
12. seattle
13. detroit
14. pittsburgh
15. new orleans
16. ny giants
17. minnesota

tier 4 - PURGATORY
18. tampa bay
19. washington
20. cleveland
21. carolina
22. la chargers
23. tennessee
24. green bay
25. las vegas

tier 5 - SHOULD HAVE JUST TANKED
26. la rams
27. atlanta
28. denver

tier 6 - IRL TANKING
29. arizona
30. chicago
31. indianapolis
32. houston


Look who mocat has #1

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67453
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22265 on: January 30, 2023, 09:46:44 PM »
Not a real chiefs fan
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29367
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22266 on: January 30, 2023, 09:57:54 PM »
dry dick chodecat strikes again

Online pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22267 on: January 30, 2023, 10:36:14 PM »
mocat’s dick is crispier than kfc


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22268 on: January 30, 2023, 11:00:33 PM »
they don’t call them mocat’s bills for nothin’

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22269 on: January 31, 2023, 08:52:51 AM »
the bills were the best team all year. the best team rarely wins the super bowl though!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22270 on: January 31, 2023, 09:32:06 AM »
the bills were the best team all year. the best team rarely wins the super bowl though!

If the Demar thing doesn't happen they would've been the 3 seed in their own conference mocat.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18070
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22271 on: January 31, 2023, 09:43:51 AM »
Bills weren't the same after Miller and Allen's injuries.  I agree that they're probably a contender going forward, but I think they were a step below the Chiefs/Bengals come playoff time this year.

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5298
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22272 on: January 31, 2023, 10:20:02 AM »
Listened to a podcast today that broke down Super Bowl winners based on the strength of schedule.  IIRC, the team who had played a stronger schedule by more than 10 places was something like 10-2 or 11-1 in the Super Bowl.  I think the Chiefs were 16th and the Eagles were 30th or 31st.
@mikec2w

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22273 on: January 31, 2023, 10:22:55 AM »
Listened to a podcast today that broke down Super Bowl winners based on the strength of schedule.  IIRC, the team who had played a stronger schedule by more than 10 places was something like 10-2 or 11-1 in the Super Bowl.  I think the Chiefs were 16th and the Eagles were 30th or 31st.
link the article kat kid

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22274 on: January 31, 2023, 11:01:48 AM »
Some of you seem to be forgetting that we won the game bc of a personal foul penalty…

You don’t think we could’ve gotten another 10 yards on the sideline and kicked with 2 seconds left? Or thrown it down the field and get a DPI?

All I’m saying is a penalty put us in position to win the game for all those folks saying punting was the smartest decision we could have made.  The offense was fighting for its life out there, the game was tied, and we were on the 37 yard line. It was definitely risky to assume that we were going to be in a better position to win the game than that.  Punting to a qb like burrow  with two and a half minutes left when all they need is a fg is basically an automatic loss in today’s game and going into ot down 3 wrs would’ve been no bueno… but we won so wgaf.